Article

Reasons for increased substance use in psychosis.

Division of Clinical Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Rutherford House, Manchester Science Park, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Clinical Psychology Review (Impact Factor: 7.18). 06/2007; 27(4):494-510. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Around half of all patients with schizophrenia are thought to abuse drugs or alcohol and there is good evidence to suggest that they have poorer outcomes than their non substance using counterparts. However, despite more than twenty years of research there is still no consensus on the aetiology of increased rates of substance use in people with psychosis. There is a clear need to understand the reasons for such high rates of substance use if treatments designed to help patients abstain from substance use are to be successful. This paper provides an update of the literature examining the reasons for substance use by people with psychosis, and includes a comprehensive review of the self report literature. The main theories as to why people with psychosis use substances are presented. There is evidence to suggest that cannabis may have a causal role in the development of psychopathology but not for other substances. The self report literature provides support for an 'alleviation of dysphoria' model of substance use but there is little empirical support for the self medication hypothesis, or for common factor models and bidirectional models of comorbidity. It is likely that there are multiple risk factors involved in substance use in psychosis and more work to develop and test multiple risk factor models is required.

2 Followers
 · 
174 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objectives To examine the trends in the incidence of dual diagnosis (DD) of severe mental illness and substance-related disorders among inpatients in Israel, and 2) the demographic and clinical correlates of DD patients. Method Using data from the National Psychiatric Case Register, we identified 56,774 inpatients aged 15-64 whose first psychiatric hospitalization occurred between 1996 and 2010. We compared the characteristics of inpatients having DD with drugs, alcohol or drug/alcohol abuse with those with mental disorder only. Results Over the period, DD with drugs decreased from 8.2% in 1996 to 6% in 2010; DD with alcohol increased from 3% to 4% and DD with drugs/alcohol from 2% to 4%. DD with drugs was highest, whereas DD with alcohol was lowest for the youngest age- group in 1996 but increased to the same as other age-groups in 2006-2010. Male gender, a previous suicide attempt, compulsory hospitalizations and marital status were positive predictors for all DD. Immigrant status was a positive predictor of DD with alcohol, but the opposite for DD with drugs; being Jewish and psychotic diagnosis was a positive predictor of DD with drugs, but negative for DD with alcohol. Conclusions Over the study period, DD with drugs has decreased among young patients, although it is still higher than among older groups. However, DD with alcohol or drugs/alcohol has increased in the younger group. The clinical-demographic profile of DD patients was similar to that from the relevant literature, except for immigrant status that was negatively associated with DD with drugs. Keywords: Dual diagnosis, Mental disorder, Substance related disorder, Co-occurrence, Temporal trends, Incidence, Israel
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence 01/2015; 148. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.01.009 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although cannabis use is common in bipolar disorder and may contribute to worse clinical outcomes, little is understood about the relationship between this drug and bipolar disorder over the course of daily life. The aim of study was to examine the effect of cannabis on affect and bipolar symptoms in a group of individuals with bipolar disorder. Twenty-four participants with bipolar disorder type I or type II completed diaries for 6 days using Experience Sampling Methodology to investigate the temporal associations between cannabis, affect and bipolar disorder symptoms. The results indicated that higher levels of positive affect increase the odds of using cannabis (OR:1.25 ,CI:1.06-1.47, P=0.008). However, neither negative affect, manic nor depressive symptoms predicted the use of cannabis. Cannabis use was associated with subsequent increases in positive affect (β=0.35, CI:0.20-0.51, P=0.000), manic symptoms (β=0.20,CI:0.05-0.34, P=0.009) and depressive symptoms (β= 0.17,CI:0.04-0.29, P=0.008). The findings indicate that cannabis use is associated with a number of subsequent psychological effects. However there was no evidence that individuals with BD were using cannabis to self-medicate minor fluctuations in negative affect or bipolar disorder symptoms over the course of daily life. The findings in relation to existing literature and clinical implications are discussed.
    PLoS ONE 03/2015; 10(3):e0118916. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0118916 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare the prevalence of Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD) among schizophrenia patients with that of the general population in a south Indian rural community. Alcohol use pattern of 254 schizophrenia patients in the past year was compared with randomly selected healthy comparison subjects (n=350) from the same community in an administrative block of rural India using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). A significantly smaller proportion of patients used alcohol in the past year (10.2%; 95% CI: 6.5%-14.0%) than controls (18.3%; 95% CI: 15.8%-24.1%; OR=2.2; 95% CI=1.4-3.5). This was true for AUD (hazardous use and harmful use; total AUDIT score >8) also: 5.5% patients (95% CI: 2.7%-8.3%) and 10.3% controls (95% CI: 7.1%-13.4%) had hazardous use (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.0-3.7). Hazardous use was associated with domicile in villages and lesser years of education. On logistic regression, after controlling for these confounds, the odds of having AUD were 2.7 times more for controls than for patients (95% CI=1.4-5.2). Prevalence of AUD is significantly lower in patients than in the general population in this community. Cross-cultural studies are needed to elucidate factors that underlie contrasting results across different countries. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
491 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014