Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain.

American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, Paducah, KY 42001, USA.
Pain physician (Impact Factor: 10.72). 02/2007; 10(1):7-111.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of chronic spinal pain with interventional techniques were developed to provide recommendations to clinicians in the United States.
To develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for interventional techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic spinal pain, utilizing all types of evidence and to apply an evidence-based approach, with broad representation by specialists from academic and clinical practices.
Study design consisted of formulation of essentials of guidelines and a series of potential evidence linkages representing conclusions and statements about relationships between clinical interventions and outcomes.
The elements of the guideline preparation process included literature searches, literature synthesis, systematic review, consensus evaluation, open forum presentation, and blinded peer review. Methodologic quality evaluation criteria utilized included the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) criteria, Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria, and Cochrane review criteria. The designation of levels of evidence was from Level I (conclusive), Level II (strong), Level III (moderate), Level IV (limited), to Level V (indeterminate).
Among the diagnostic interventions, the accuracy of facet joint nerve blocks is strong in the diagnosis of lumbar and cervical facet joint pain, whereas, it is moderate in the diagnosis of thoracic facet joint pain. The evidence is strong for lumbar discography, whereas, the evidence is limited for cervical and thoracic discography. The evidence for transforaminal epidural injections or selective nerve root blocks in the preoperative evaluation of patients with negative or inconclusive imaging studies is moderate. The evidence for diagnostic sacroiliac joint injections is moderate. The evidence for therapeutic lumbar intraarticular facet injections is moderate for short-term and long-term improvement, whereas, it is limited for cervical facet joint injections. The evidence for lumbar and cervical medial branch blocks is moderate. The evidence for medial branch neurotomy is moderate. The evidence for caudal epidural steroid injections is strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief in managing chronic low back and radicular pain, and limited in managing pain of postlumbar laminectomy syndrome. The evidence for interlaminar epidural steroid injections is strong for short-term relief and limited for long-term relief in managing lumbar radiculopathy, whereas, for cervical radiculopathy the evidence is moderate. The evidence for transforaminal epidural steroid injections is strong for short-term and moderate for long-term improvement in managing lumbar nerve root pain, whereas, it is moderate for cervical nerve root pain and limited in managing pain secondary to lumbar post laminectomy syndrome and spinal stenosis. The evidence for percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis is strong. For spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis, the evidence is strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief. For sacroiliac intraarticular injections, the evidence is moderate for short-term relief and limited for long-term relief. The evidence for radiofrequency neurotomy for sacroiliac joint pain is limited. The evidence for intradiscal electrothermal therapy is moderate in managing chronic discogenic low back pain, whereas for annuloplasty the evidence is limited. Among the various techniques utilized for percutaneous disc decompression, the evidence is moderate for short-term and limited for long-term relief for automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy, and percutaneous laser discectomy, whereas it is limited for nucleoplasty and for DeKompressor technology. For vertebral augmentation procedures, the evidence is moderate for both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The evidence for spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome is strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief. The evidence for implantable intrathecal infusion systems is strong for short-term relief and moderate for long-term relief.
These guidelines include the evaluation of evidence for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in managing chronic spinal pain and recommendations for managing spinal pain. However, these guidelines do not constitute inflexible treatment recommendations. These guidelines also do not represent a "standard of care."

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of medial branch in patients with chronic low back pain originating from facet joints.
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 10/2014; 56(4):338-43.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IntroductionSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is well accepted for the treatment of chronic pain since its beginning in 1967. As its use continues to enter into the chronic pain treatment algorithm earlier, conscience patient selection and durability of the therapy are clearly clinically relevant. To improve treatment efficacy, consensus statements and guidelines were developed.Objective The purpose of this work is to review the relevant guideline statements for implantable neurostimulation therapies to treat chronic pain and to identify guideline gaps and future directions for recommendation platforms.Materials and MethodsA systematic literature search through EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane data base, as well as peer-reviewed, nonindexed journals and materials presented at national and international meetings was performed to chronologically identify consensus statements or guideline statements for use of neurostimulation therapies to treat chronic neuropathic pain limited to the English language.ResultsFrom 1998 to 2013, 22 guideline statements were identified. Thirteen of the 22 guidelines were society-sponsored guideline statements from ten societies. Two guideline statements were from research foundations, two were government supported, and one statement was published as a position statement.Conclusions The current available guideline statements have clear deficiencies in either scope of coverage, evidence synthesis, or lack of transparency of funding. Improved evidence and best practice/guideline assessment may improve patient outcomes and accessibility to these important modalities. Further prospective comparator randomized data are required to not only provide data of clinical and cost-effectiveness in other indications but also to better describe the position of neurostimulation application within the disease management pathway. Therein cases where there appears to be sufficient evidence and consensus, every effort should be made to secure access to these effective therapies. Importantly, each guideline only has a useful clinical half-life, if not updated. This should be acknowledged by both clinicians and third-party payers. Based on these deficiencies, the International Neuromodulation Society recommended the creation of a consensus conference to examine the appropriate use of neurostimulation for pain and ischemic disease.
    Neuromodulation 06/2014; · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Konzepte zur Behandlung von Rückenschmerzen sind in den letzten Jahren unter dem Einfluss der Erkenntnisse zur Schmerzchronifizierung verstärkt in die Diskussion gekommen. Jede Art der Therapie setzt in jedem Falle eine möglichst exakte Diagnose voraus. Die Zuordnung klinischer Befunde zu bestehenden strukturellen Pathologien ist bei lumbalem Rückenschmerz jedoch nicht immer einfach. Die stationäre Stufendiagnostik im hier vorgestellten Konzept erfasst eine abgestufte strukturelle und funktionelle Diagnostik bei Rückenschmerzpatienten. Neben den spezifischen (klassifizierbaren) Faktoren der Schmerzverursachung (z. B. Wurzelkompression, facettenassoziierte Schmerzsyndrome, sakroiliakale Dysfunktion, segmentale Instabilität) sind auch unspezifische (nicht klassifizierbare) Krankheitsursachen und begleitende, die Krankheit beeinflussende oder sogar wesentlich bestimmende Faktoren der biopsychosozialen Ebenen zu differenzieren. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, den Wert und das Vorgehen stationärer Stufendiagnostik vorzustellen. Es werden verschieden Verfahren aufgezeigt und deren Wert für bestimmte Indikationen beschrieben.
    Der Orthopäde 01/2008; 37(4). · 0.51 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 10, 2014