Article

Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 02/2007; 109(2 Pt 1):262-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000254169.49346.e9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare pregnancy outcomes in women with one prior low-transverse cesarean delivery after induction of labor with pregnancy outcomes after spontaneous labor.
This study is an analysis of women with one prior low-transverse cesarean and a singleton gestation who underwent a trial of labor and who were enrolled in a 4-year prospective observational study. Pregnancy outcomes were evaluated according to whether a woman underwent spontaneous labor or labor induction.
Among the 11,778 women studied, vaginal delivery was less likely after induction of labor both in women without and with a prior vaginal delivery (51% versus 65%, P<.001; and 83% versus 88%, P<.001). An increased risk of uterine rupture after labor induction was found only in women with no prior vaginal delivery (1.5% versus 0.8%, P=.02; and 0.6% versus 0.4%, P=.42). Blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism, and hysterectomy were also more common with induction among women without a prior vaginal delivery. No measure of perinatal morbidity was associated with labor induction. An unfavorable cervix at labor induction was not associated with any adverse outcomes except an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
Induction of labor in the study population is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery in all women with an unfavorable cervix, a statistically significant, albeit clinically small, increase in maternal morbidity in women with no prior vaginal delivery, and no appreciable increase in perinatal morbidity.
II.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
139 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after one previous cesarean (TOLAC) when incorporating long-term events and outcomes. A Markov model comparing TOLAC with elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) was developed for a hypothetical cohort with no contraindication to a TOLAC. Women were selected from a prospective study to derive probability estimates for potential events through three subsequent pregnancies. Probabilities for cerebral palsy and stress urinary incontinence, cost data, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were obtained from the literature. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness measured as the marginal cost per QALY gained, with a $50,000 threshold per QALY used to define cost-effectiveness. The TOLAC strategy dominated the ERCD strategy at baseline, with $164.2 million saved and 500 QALYs gained per 100,000 women. The model was sensitive to six variables: the probability of uterine rupture and successful TOLAC among women with no prior vaginal delivery, the frequency of stress urinary incontinence, and the costs of failed TOLAC, successful TOLAC, and ERCD. When the probability of TOLAC success was at the base value, 67.2%, TOLAC was preferred if the probability of uterine rupture was 3.1% or less. When the probability of uterine rupture was at the base value, 0.8%, the TOLAC strategy was preferred as long as the probability of success was 47.2% or more. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the base-case analysis. Under baseline circumstances, TOLAC is less expensive and more effective than an ERCD when considering long-term consequences when the likelihood of success is 47.2% or more.
    Value in Health 09/2013; 16(6):953-64. DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.014 · 2.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: As conflicting data exist concerning the safety of induction of labor (IoL) in women with previous single lower segment cesarean section (CS), we aimed to assess pregnancy outcome following IoL in such patient population. Methods: All singleton pregnancies with previous single CS which underwent IoL during 2008-2012 were included (study group). Their pregnancy outcome was compared to those pregnancies with previous single CS that admitted with spontaneous onset of labor (control group). Results: Overall, 1,898 pregnancies were eligible, of them, 259 underwent IoL, and 1,639 were admitted with spontaneous onset of labor. Parity, gestational age at delivery and birthweight were similar. Women in the study group were more likely to undergo CS mainly due to labor dystocia (8.1% vs. 3.7%, p<0.01). The rate of CS due to non-reassuring fetal heart rate was similar. No difference was found in the rate of uterine rupture/dehiscence. Short-term neonatal outcome was similar between the groups. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, IoL was not independently associated with uterine rupture (OR 1.33, 95% C.I 0.46-3.84, p=0.59) Conclusion: Our data suggest that IoL in women with one previous low segment CS neither increases the risk of uterine rupture, nor adversely affects immediate neonatal outcome.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 04/2014; DOI:10.3109/14767058.2014.916685 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: This study aims to evaluate factors that predict the likelihood of the success of induction of labor (IOL) in women that had a previous cesarean section (pCS). Methods: Pregnant women with one pCS performed more than 18 months prior were included in this retrospective observational study. Of 242 eligible women, 234 were enrolled; 120 (51.3%) of these women delivered vaginally (VD), with the remainder receiving a repeat cesarean section (CS). Results: The main reasons for IOL were premature rupture of membranes (PROM) (37.1%) and post-date pregnancy (26.5%). Babies with a birth weight ≥4000 g were more prevalent in women undergoing CS (21/114; 18.4%, p<.02) and were associated with the failure of IOL. Uterine rupture during labor (1.3%) occurred in 3 cases. Having had a previous vaginal delivery (VD) (P=.01), not being African (P=.022), and receiving IOL for PROM (P=.04) with a cervical Bishop score ≥5 (P=.015) significantly predicted the occurrence of a VD, with an 15% variance (P<.001). An age >35 years appears to not affect the success of induction. Conclusions: A successful IOL should be expected in Caucasian women induced for PROM with a favorable Bishop score.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine: the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 03/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.3109/14767058.2014.900750 · 1.36 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
216 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014