Prefrontal cortex activity is reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision-making

Department of Radiology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Human Brain Mapping (Impact Factor: 6.92). 12/2007; 28(12):1276-86. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20344
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Poor decision-making is a hallmark of addiction, whether to substances or activities. Performance on a widely used test of decision-making, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), can discriminate controls from persons with ventral medial frontal lesions, substance-dependence, and pathological gambling. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies indicate that substance-dependent individuals show altered prefrontal activity on the task. Here we adapted the IGT to an fMRI setting to test the hypothesis that defects in ventral medial and prefrontal processing are associated with impaired decisions that involve risk but may differ depending on whether substance dependence is comorbid with gambling problems.
18 controls, 14 substance-dependent individuals (SD), and 16 SD with gambling problems (SDPG) underwent fMRI while performing a modified version of the IGT.
Group differences were observed in ventral medial frontal, right frontopolar, and superior frontal cortex during decision-making. Controls showed the greatest activity, followed by SDPG, followed by SD.
Our results support a hypothesis that defects in ventral medial frontal processing lead to impaired decisions that involve risk. Reductions in right prefrontal activity during decision-making appear to be modulated by the presence of gambling problems and may reflect impaired working memory, stimulus reward valuation, or cue reactivity in substance-dependent individuals.

Download full-text


Available from: Eric Claus, Aug 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "Within-group images were thresholded using cluster detection statistics, with a height threshold of z > 2.3 and a cluster probability of P < 0.05, corrected for wholebrain multiple comparisons based on Gaussian random field theory. Between-group images were thresholded using cluster detection statistics, with a height threshold of z > 2.3 and a cluster probability of P < 0.05, using a priori region of interest (ROI) constructed as spheres ranging from 5 to 10 mm and centered based on peak coordinates from previous brain imaging studies on the IGT (Bolla et al. 2003; Tanabe et al. 2007; Christakou et al. 2009; Li et al. 2010; Power et al. 2012). ROIs comprised the DLPFC (10 mm spheres, coordinates: ±40, 28, 30), "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of different neural systems on monetary decision making in frequent poker gamblers, who vary in their degree of problem gambling. Fifteen frequent poker players, ranging from non-problem to high-problem gambling, and 15 non-gambler controls were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). During IGT deck selection, between-group fMRI analyses showed that frequent poker gamblers exhibited higher ventral-striatal but lower dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal activations as compared with controls. Moreover, using functional connectivity analyses, we observed higher ventral-striatal connectivity in poker players, and in regions involved in attentional/motor control (posterior cingulate), visual (occipital gyrus) and auditory (temporal gyrus) processing. In poker gamblers, scores of problem gambling severity were positively associated with ventral-striatal activations and with the connectivity between the ventral-striatum seed and the occipital fusiform gyrus and the middle temporal gyrus. Present results are consistent with findings from recent brain imaging studies showing that gambling disorder is associated with heightened motivational-reward processes during monetary decision making, which may hamper one's ability to moderate his level of monetary risk taking. © 2015 Society for the Study of Addiction.
    Addiction Biology 03/2015; DOI:10.1111/adb.12239 · 5.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Crockford et al., 2005; Potenza et al., 2003b; van Holst et al., 2012a; Goudriaan et al., 2010); risky decision making (e.g. Tanabe et al., 2007); inhibitory control (Potenza et al., 2003a); presentation of non-monetary reward , such as personally relevant stimuli (e.g. de Greck et al., 2010); probability and delay discounting of monetary reward (e.g. Miedl et al., 2012) as well as processing of monetary gains and losses (Miedl et al., 2012; Sescousse et al., 2013; Miedl et al., 2010; Reuter et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neurobiological underpinnings of effort-related monetary reward processing of gambling disorder have not been previously studied. To date neuroimaging studies lack in large sample sizes and as a consequence less attention has been given to brain reward processing that could potentially be attributed to comorbid conditions such as depressive mood state. We assessed monetary reward processing using an effort-dependent task during 3 tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging. We investigated a large sample of male, right-handed, slot-machine-playing disordered gamblers (DGs; N = 80) as well as age- and smoking-matched male healthy controls (HCs; N = 89). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). DGs and HCs were divided into subgroups (“high” and “low”) based on their BDI scores. Effort-related monetary reward processing did not differ between the complete groups of HCs and DGs. Brain activation during receipt of monetary reward though revealed a significant Group × BDI interaction: DGs with higher BDI scores compared to DGs with lower BDI scores showed greater brain activity in the right insula cortex and dorsal striatum while no differences were observed for HCs with higher versus lower BDI scores. Our results suggest that effort-related aspects of monetary motivation, i.e. when monetary output is tied to performance, are not altered in DG. Additionally, our findings strengthen the need for subgroup comparisons in future investigations of the disorder as part of a personalized medicine approach.
  • Source
    • "In each of these tasks, participants are required to choose between " safe " and " risky " monetary gambles. Many studies fail to report performance differences between individuals with substance use disorders and control participants (e.g., Acheson et al., 2009; Adinoff et al., 2003; Bjork et al., 2008; Bolla et al., 2003; Cousijn et al., 2013; Ersche et al., 2005; Tanabe et al., 2007; Vaidya et al., 2012); but see (Bolla et al., 2005; Fein et al., 2004; Fishbein et al., 2005; Lane et al., 2010). These mixed results in risk-taking behavior have been replicated by our own group, which investigated risk-taking behavior in treatment-seeking alcoholic patients compared to controls and found no behavioral differences (e.g., Gilman et al., 2014). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Though substance use is often associated with elevated risk-taking in real-world scenarios, many risk-taking tasks in experimental psychology using financial gambles fail to find significant differences between individuals with substance use disorders and healthy controls. We assessed whether participants using marijuana would show a greater propensity for risk-taking in distinct domains including, but not limited to, financial risk-taking. In the current study, we assessed risk-taking in young adult (age 18-25) regular marijuana users and in non-using control participants using a domain-specific risk-taking self-report scale (DOSPERT) encompassing five domains of risk-taking (social, financial, recreational, health/safety, and ethical). We also measured behavioral risk-taking using a laboratory monetary risk-taking task. Marijuana users and controls reported significant differences on the social, health/safety, and ethical risk-taking scales, but no differences in the propensity to take recreational or financial risks. Complementing the self-report finding, there were no differences between marijuana users and controls in their performance on the laboratory risk-taking task. These findings suggest that financial risk-taking may be less sensitive than other domains of risk-taking in assessing differences in risky behavior between those who use marijuana and those who do not. In order to more consistently determine whether increased risk-taking is a factor in substance use, it may be necessary to use both monetary risk-taking tasks and complementary assessments of non-monetary-based risk-taking measures. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence 12/2014; 147. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.020 · 3.28 Impact Factor
Show more