Introducing external cephalic version in a Malaysian setting

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of Medicine (Impact Factor: 0.87). 03/2007; 13(1):40-5.
Source: PubMed


To assess the outcome of external cephalic version for routine management of malpresenting foetuses at term.
Prospective observational study.
Tertiary teaching hospital, Malaysia.
From September 2003 to June 2004, a study involving 41 pregnant women with malpresentation at term was undertaken. An external cephalic version protocol was implemented. Data were collected for identifying characteristics associated with success or failure of external cephalic version.
Maternal and foetal outcome measures including success rate of external cephalic version, maternal and foetal complications, and characteristics associated with success or failure; engagement of presenting part, placental location, direction of version, attempts at version, use of intravenous tocolytic agent, eventual mode of delivery, Apgar scores, birth weights, and maternal satisfaction with the procedure.
Data were available for 38 women. External cephalic version was successful in 63% of patients; the majority (75%) of whom achieved a vaginal delivery. Multiparity (odds ratio=34.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1730) and high amniotic fluid index (4.9; 1.3-18.2) were associated with successful external cephalic version. Engagement of presenting part (odds ratio=0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 0.00001-0.001) and a need to resort to backward somersault (0.02; 0.00001-0.916) were associated with poor success rates. Emergency caesarean section rate for foetal distress directly resulting from external cephalic version was 8%, but there was no perinatal or maternal adverse outcome. The majority (74%) of women were satisfied with external cephalic version.
External cephalic version has acceptable success rates. Multiparity, liquor volume, engagement of presenting part, and the need for backward somersault were strong predictors of outcome. External cephalic version is relatively safe, simple to learn and perform, and associated with maternal satisfaction. Modern obstetric units should routinely offer the procedure.

16 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess patients' preferences and trade-offs for mode of delivery in case of breech presentation at term. Eighty women (40 with a foetus in breech presentation and 40 with a foetus in cephalic presentation) with a gestational age from 36 weeks onwards were offered scenarios of vaginal and caesarean breech delivery in which 1-month and 2-year neonatal and maternal complication rates were varied; expectant fathers (when present) were interviewed separately. Thresholds for complication rates where patients switch preferences were visualised graphically in trade-off curves. Differences in preference thresholds were tested using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Caesarean delivery was the preferred mode of delivery for breech presentation in 65% of the patients interviewed. The trade-off questions showed that the 2-year neonatal outcome after breech delivery was the most important outcome for the mothers, whereas the fathers were more influenced by the maternal outcome. When realistic assumptions for complications are made, most women prefer a caesarean delivery over vaginal delivery for at term breech presentation. In the balance of pros and cons, 2-year neonatal outcome is the most important factor in the decision between caesarean and vaginal delivery. The results of this study can be used by the clinician to help patients weigh risk, benefit, and potential harm with regard to breech delivery.
    Patient Education and Counseling 09/2008; 72(2):305-10. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.008 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 12/2008; 112(5):1143-51. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: External cephalic version (ECV) is an obstetric maneuver that rotates the fetus to a cephalic presentation in case of breech, oblique or transverse lie presentations. During the past 14 years, the most relevant studies (n >200 patients) reveal success rates ranging from 37% to 78.7%. The contraindications of ECV are: when a clear indication for a cesarean delivery exists, fetal compromise, placenta praevia, placenta abruption, intrauterine fetal death, rupture of membranes, multiple gestation, Rh sensitivization, uterine abnormalities and coagulation disorders. ECV was only contraindicated in 4% of breech presentations. Many authors have examined the factors associated with ECV success rate. We did not identify any factor that showed a constant association across all studies. The goal of describing factors associated with ECV success rate is to determine whether they can be enhanced, thus contributing to improve ECV success rate. Studies have focused on three different actuations: tocolysis, regional analgesia and amnioinfusion. ECV is not alien to complications, although the risk of complications remains low when performed correctly. The reported complications are transitory alteration of cardiotocography, feto-maternal transfusion, urgent cesarean delivery, perinatal mortality, vaginal hemorrhage, premature detachment of the placenta. The final goal of ECV is to decrease the presence of breech presentations at the time of labor and thus reduce the rate of cesarean sections. A meta-analysis of the Cochrane review observed a significant decrease in the rate of cesarean sections (RR=0.52; CI95%=0.39-0.71) in patients subject to ECV at term without worse perinatal outcomes.
    Current Women s Health Reviews 11/2011; 7(4-4):405-415. DOI:10.2174/157340411799079481
Show more

Similar Publications


16 Reads
Available from