Examination of Platelet Function in Whole Blood Under Dynamic Flow Conditions With the Cone and Plate(let) Analyzer Effect of Erythrocytosis and Thrombocytosis

Department of Medicine, Cornell University, Итак, New York, United States
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.51). 04/2007; 127(3):422-8. DOI: 10.1309/B29E2AHMTQA1KAKJ
Source: PubMed


We studied cone and plate(let) analysis (CPA) for evaluating global platelet function in whole blood under arterial flow conditions (approximately 1,800 seconds(-1)). CPA allows direct visualization and quantitation of platelet adhesion (surface coverage [SC]) and determination of average aggregate size (AS) following brief shearing of a small blood sample (3.2% sodium citrate) in plastic wells. By using blood from healthy volunteers manipulated to alter platelet or RBC counts and blood from patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs), quantitative and qualitative changes in SC and AS were observed. Thrombocytosis resulted in increased SC, whereas erythrocytosis increased AS. The RBC volume (mean corpuscular volume) had no effect. It is interesting that differences in CPA AS were discerned among subgroups of patients with MPD undergoing different treatment regimens. These studies suggest that CPA platelet deposition patterns may provide novel insight into global platelet function during hemodynamic flow.

Download full-text


Available from: David Varon, Oct 11, 2015
59 Reads
  • Source
    • "Human blood was collected from healthy, medication-free donors in tri-sodium citrate 3.8%, 1:7 ratio. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) was prepared as before [30] with the following modifications. Briefly, blood was centrifuged at 800 rpm for 15 minutes, PRP collected and further centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 4 minutes in the presence of citrate (5 mM). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systemic adenoviral (Ad) vector administration is associated with thrombocytopenia. Recently, Ad interaction with mouse platelets emerged as a key player determining liver uptake and platelet clearance. However, whether Ad can activate platelets is controversial. Thus, in vitro analysis of Ad attachment to platelets is of interest. We developed a direct flow cytometry assay to specifically detect Ad particles adherent to human platelets. The method was pre-validated in nucleated cells. Blocking assays were employed to specifically inhibit Ad attachment to platelets. Platelet activation was analyzed using annexin v flow cytometry. We found in vitro that Ad binding to human platelets is synergistically enhanced by the combination of platelet activation by thrombin and MnCl2 supplementation. Of note, Ad binding could activate human platelets. Platelets bound Ad displaying an RGD ligand in the fiber knob more efficiently than unmodified Ad. In contrast to a previous report, CAR expression was not detected on human platelets. Integrins appear to mediate Ad binding to platelets, at least partially. Finally, alphaIIbbeta3-deficient platelets from a patient with Glanzmann thrombasthenia could bind Ad 5-fold more efficiently than normal platelets. The flow cytometry methodology developed herein allows the quantitative measurement of Ad attachment to platelets and may provide a useful in vitro approach to investigate Ad interaction with platelets.
    Virology Journal 03/2009; 6(1):25. DOI:10.1186/1743-422X-6-25 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Platelets play a vital role in the normal hemostasis, and derangements of their function can lead to hemorrhage or thrombosis. While we have made progress in elucidating the molecular mechanisms leading to platelet adhesion, aggregation, shape change, and secretion, clinically useful tests of platelet function have lagged behind. The following is a review of some of the currently available tests of platelet function, their advantages and drawbacks, as well as the clinical scenarios in which they are likely to be useful. Attention is now being paid to standardization and optimization of older tests such as platelet aggregometry, in addition to better defining the role of newer tests such as the platelet function analyzer and thromboelastography in diagnosing and managing disorders of primary hemostasis and platelet function. Platelet function is complex and may be disrupted at any of a number of steps, including adhesion, aggregation, shape change and secretion. We are better defining the role of the currently available tests, while identifying gaps in our ability to diagnose disorders of platelet function.
    Current Opinion in Hematology 10/2007; 14(5):432-7. DOI:10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282b9747b · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Platelet (PLT) collection and storage affect the functional capacity of PLTs in PLT concentrates (PCs). Therefore, PLTs' functional quality should be studied before transfusion. PCs (n = 15) were collected by a standard apheresis procedure (Trima, Gambro BCT) and were stored for 7 days. Samples were taken to assess PLT adhesion and aggregate formation by a cone and plate analyzer (Impact-R, DiaMed) on Days 1, 3, 5, and 7 after harvesting. This device allows testing PLT function under high-shear stress close to physiologic conditions. Concomitantly, P-selectin expression and the residual responsiveness to TRAP-6 were determined by flow cytometry. PLT adhesion, as measured by surface coverage, decreased during the entire observation period; likewise, the size of aggregates was significantly lower on Days 5 and 7 compared to Day 1 (p < 0.02). P-selectin expression increased from Day 5 to Day 7 (p < 0.04), whereas TRAP-6-inducible expression remained stable until Day 5 of storage and decreased significantly on Day 7 (p = 0.04). Our results show that high-shear-induced PLT adhesion and aggregation on the polystyrene surface deteriorate upon storage, suggesting decreased PLT function in vivo. Thus, the Impact-R may be a useful tool to assess the functional capacity of PLTs under various PLT harvesting and storage procedures.
    Transfusion 01/2008; 48(1):129-35. DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01490.x · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more