Scanning holographic microscopy with resolution
exceeding the Rayleigh limit of the objective by
superposition of off-axis holograms
Guy Indebetouw, Yoshitaka Tada, Joseph Rosen, and Gary Brooker
We present what we believe to be a new application of scanning holographic microscopy to superresolu-
tion. Spatial resolution exceeding the Rayleigh limit of the objective is obtained by digital coherent
addition of the reconstructions of several off-axis Fresnel holograms. Superresolution by holographic
superposition and synthetic aperture has a long history, which is briefly reviewed. The method is
demonstrated experimentally by combining three off-axis holograms of fluorescent beads showing a
transverse resolution gain of nearly a factor of 2.© 2007 Optical Society of America
090.0090, 180.0180, 180.2520, 110.0180, 110.6880.
Extending the resolution beyond the theoretical Ray-
leigh limit of the objective has been, and still is, an
important quest in high-resolution microscopy. In
the recent past, many different approaches toward
achieving this goal have been proposed and demon-
strated. A number of superresolution methods are
based on the rearrangement and smart use of the
degrees of freedom of the image and of the optical
system.1–6The general idea is to utilize degrees of
freedom that are deemed unnecessary.7–11The de-
grees of freedom that can be sacrificed to improve the
spatial resolution are numerous. For example, they
can be dimensional,12temporal,13,14or polarization.15
Different approaches to superresolution are based on
analytic extrapolation, iterative use of a priori knowl-
edge,16,17or deconvolution.18Closest to the method
described in this paper, structured illumination, spa-
tial encoding, and methods based on aperture syn-
thesis have also been successfully demonstrated for
superresolution. These are based on the early idea
that an object’s spatial frequencies exceeding the
limit of the pupil of the imaging system can be ac-
cessed by illuminating the object with gratings or
interference patterns that shift the otherwise inac-
cessible spatial frequencies back into the pupil’s
transmission disk.19,20This idea has been imple-
mented in a large number of ways.21–27
Many superresolution methods deal with the
improvement of a single planar image. For 3D spec-
imens (as is often the case in biological studies, for
example), it is thus necessary to process each axial
section separately, and sequentially, which can be
time consuming. Holographic methods alleviate this
limitation by offering the possibility of improving the
resolution of the entire 3D information recorded on
the hologram. The idea of improving the resolution by
adding holograms dates from the early developments
of electronic holography.28,29Recent advances in de-
tector and computer power have triggered renewed
interest in applying these ideas with modern digital
resolution imaging of 3D biological specimens as well
as of quantitative measurement of their phase infor-
mation.38,39However, one limitation of digital holog-
raphy is that it requires a minimum degree of spatial
and spectral coherence in order to encode the holo-
gram phase in the form of interference fringes be-
tween the light scattered by the specimen and a
reference wave. This necessity precludes the use of
G. Indebetouw (email@example.com) and Y. Tada are with the
0435, USA. J. Rosen and G. Brooker are with the Department of
Biology, Integrated Imaging Center, Johns Hopkins University,
Montgomery County Campus, 9605 Medical Center Drive, Rock-
ville, Maryland 20850, USA. J. Rosen is also with the Department
of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of
the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel, from which he
is presently on leave.
Received 30 August 2006; revised 13 October 2006; accepted 16
October 2006; posted 16 October 2006 (Doc. ID 74610); published 2
© 2007 Optical Society of America
20 February 2007 ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? APPLIED OPTICS993
digital holography with fluorescent specimens. Yet
modem biological studies rely heavily on specific flu-
orescence excitation and the emission of specific flu-
orescent probes. In scanning holography a phase
encoding excitation pattern is scanned over the spec-
imen in a 2D raster, and the hologram phase is en-
coded in the temporal domain.40The method has
been shown capable of reconstructing high-resolution
holographic images of 3D fluorescent specimens with-
out requiring the spatial coherence of the specimen’s
emission,41as well as of measuring the phase of a
specimen quantitatively.42The method has also been
shown to offer the possibility of synthesizing different
point spread functions (PSF)43and of locating small
fluorescent features in 3D with submicrometer accu-
In this paper we demonstrate experimentally that
synthesizing a pupil exceeding the objective’s pupil
disk is easily implemented in scanning holographic
microscopy and leads to images of 3D fluorescent
specimens reconstructed with a spatial resolution ex-
ceeding the Rayleigh limit of the objective. The re-
sults shown here are illustrative in demonstrating
the principle, but do not attempt to test the limits of
capability of the method. In Section 2, the basic ideas
of scanning holographic microscopy are briefly re-
viewed and how superresolution is achieved by im-
plementing the idea of pupil synthesis is described.
Section 3 specifies the experimental setup, and an
experimental demonstration is presented and dis-
cussed in Section 4. Final remarks and a summary
are given in Section 5.
In conventional scanning holography, two pupils are
combined by a beam splitter and superposed in the
entrance pupil of the objective. One pupil is a spherical
wave filling the objective’s pupil disk, and having a
curvature chosen to produce, in the back focal plane of
the objective (which is also the object’s space), a spher-
ical wave with a radius of curvature z0. The other is a
point at the center of the entrance pupil of the objec-
tive, producing a plane wave in the object’s space.
The interference of these two waves results in a 3D
Fresnel zone pattern (FZP) that is scanned over the
specimen in a 2D raster. The scattered or fluorescent
light is collected by a nonimaging detector (photo-
diode, or photomultiplier). A single-sideband holo-
gram can be obtained from this data in two ways:
either by heterodyne detection using a frequency dif-
ference between the two pupils,45or by homodyne
detection46using three scans with three fixed phase
differences between the two pupils.47,48Other meth-
ods of data acquisition have also been proposed.49
The hologram can be reconstructed numerically by
Fresnel back propagation or by correlation with an
experimental PSF. The spatial resolution of the re-
constructed image is determined by the numerical
aperture of the FZP scanned over the object. With
an on-line hologram, the spatial frequency spec-
trum of the reconstruction is confined to the disk of
the objective’s pupil, which has a cutoff frequency
?MAX? NAOBJ??, where NAOBJis the numerical aper-
ture of the objective, and ? is the wavelength of the
To extend the spectrum beyond the objective’s cut-
off in a particular direction specified by a unit vector
n ˆ, one can record an off-axis hologram by scanning an
off-axis FZP on the specimen. If the spatial frequency
offset of the FZP is ?0n ˆ, the spatial frequency spec-
trum of the reconstruction is extended up to a value
?MAX? ?0in the direction of n ˆ. By combining several
holograms with shifts in different angular directions,
it is thus possible to tile an object’s spatial frequency
spectrum that extends, in principle, far beyond the
objective’s pupil disk.
The two pupils needed to create an off-axis FZP are
P˜2j?? ?????? ? ??0n ˆj?. (1)
Disk?x? ? 1 for x ? 1, and ?0 for x ? 1. In these
expressions, ? ? is the transverse spatial frequency vec-
tor in the pupil plane, proportional to the transverse
spatial coordinate vector r ?Pin the pupil: ? ? ? r ?P?
?fOBJ, where fOBJis the focal length of the objective.50
In the object’s space, P1?r ?? is a converging spherical
wave with radius of curvature z0, and P2j?r ?? is a plane
wave with a transverse spatial frequency ?0n ˆj. After
heterodyne detection, or phase-shifted homodyne de-
tection, each object point is encoded as an off-axis
spherical wave Sj?r ?, z?, where z is the axial coordinate
in object space measured from the focal plane of the
objective. In Fourier space, we have
S˜j?? ?, z??P˜1?? ?, z??P˜2j?? ?, z?
?Disk??? ? ??0n ˆj???MAX?,
2??z0?z???2?2? ? ·?0n ˆj???
where Q symbolizes a correlation integral, and
P˜1,2?? ?, z? are the generalized (defocused) pupils51de-
P˜1,2?? ?, z??P˜1,2?? ??exp?i2?z???2??2?,(3a)
or in paraxial approximation,
P˜1?? ?, z??exp?i2?z???exp?i???z0?z??2?
P˜2j?? ?, z??exp?i2?z???exp??i??z?0
2???? ? ??0n ˆj?.
The Fourier transform of the specimen hologram is
Oj??dzI˜?? ?, z?S˜j?? ?, z?, (4)
994APPLIED OPTICS ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? 20 February 2007
where I˜?? ?, z? is the 2D transverse Fourier transform
of the 3D object intensity distribution I?r ?, z?. The re-
construction of the hologram in a chosen axial plane
of focus z ? zRcan be obtained by digital Fresnel
back propagation from the hologram for a distance
z0? zR. In the experiment discussed in Section 4, we
chose to reconstruct the hologram by correlation with
the experimental hologram of a subresolution point
source. As has been shown previously,41this method
offers a way of reducing the phase aberrations of the
objective.41With high NA objectives, these aberra-
tions are attributable to the fact that the objective is
not (and cannot be) used in the geometry for which it
was designed, and can be severe. In the experiment
described in Section 3, this scheme is implemented by
recording a reference hologram HRj?r ?? of a point
source ??r ?, z?, and propagating it to the desired re-
construction plane by using a propagation factor
Pj?r ?, zR?. In Fourier space, we have
Rj?? ???exp?i??z0??? ? ??0n ˆj?
?Disk??? ? ??0n ˆj???MAX?,
P˜j?? ?, zR??exp??i??zR??2?2? ? ·?0n ˆj??. (6)
The Fourier transform of the reconstructed image is
then given by
R˜j?? ?, zR??H˜
Rj?? ??P˜j?? ?, zR??*
??dzI˜?? ?, z?exp?i???zR?z???2?2? ? ·?0n ˆj??
?Disk??? ? ??0n ˆj???MAX?, (7)
where the asterisk represents a complex conjugation.
In the plane of focus z ? zR, the reconstruction has a
spatial frequency spectrum consisting of the object’s
spatial frequencies located within a disk of radius
?MAX, centered at ?0n ˆj. By adding coherently the re-
construction amplitudes of a number of holograms
with different spatial frequency shifts, one can, in
principle, tile a synthetic pupil with an area far ex-
ceeding the pupil disk of the objective.
It must be emphasized that although the pupil rep-
resentation in Eq. (1) is, strictly speaking, valid only
in the paraxial regime,52the method of scanning ho-
lographic microscopy is not limited to small NAs. In
fact, since we actually measure the PSF, and recon-
struct the holograms by this experimental PSF, our
method is valid regardless of the system’s NA, and it
is independent of the theoretical representation of
The experimental setup of a scanning holographic
microscope has been described in detail in previous
publications.40,41For completeness, a sketch is given
in Fig. 1. The only addition to the previous arrange-
ments is the introduction of a wedge prism in a con-
jugate object plane to shift the spatial frequency of
the plane wave creating the FZP by a chosen amount
in a chosen direction. The wedge is then rotated in
discrete angular steps to cover a desired area of the
object’s spatial frequency spectrum. For experimen-
tal simplicity we chose to introduce both the spherical
wave and the off-axis plane wave forming the FZP
through the pupil of the objective. With this method,
the largest spatial frequency shift achievable is the
objective’s frequency cutoff, namely, ?0? ?MAX. Opt-
ing for this geometry is not a necessary requirement.
electro-optic phase modulator. L1,2are achromat doublet lenses, 16 cm focal length, L3is a collecting lens, 1 cm focal length. The wedge
on a rotating stage is used to create off-axis Fresnel patterns on the specimen.
Schematic of an off-axis scanning holographic microscope. M, mirrors; BS, beam splitters; DBS, dichroic beam splitter; EOM,
20 February 2007 ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? APPLIED OPTICS 995
In principle, it is possible to introduce the off-axis
plane waves externally at any angle, although this
practice may be difficult to implement at high NA.
Nevertheless, the transfer function of such system
could in principle be extended to its theoretical fre-
quency limit of 2?? and cover the entire spectral re-
gion inside this limit. Additionally, it may also be
possible to introduce several plane waves simulta-
neously by using an array of sources.35–37
The experiment uses a Mitutoyo Plan Apo objective
20x, 0.42 NA, chosen for its long working distance.
The detector is a commercial Hamamatsu photomul-
tiplier tube (R1166). The specimen is scanned in a 2D
raster using a piezo scanning stage (PI Hera 625).
The FZP modulation is provided by an electro-optic
phase modulator (Linos LM0202) driven by a saw
tooth waveform at 25 kHz. The signal is sampled at
100 kSample?s by a GageScope 1602. The hologram
is constructed line by line after bandpass filtering
at the modulation frequency, as previously de-
scribed, and reconstructed digitally using MATLAB
codes (MATLAB 126.96.36.199?R14 SP3) on a standard
personal computer (PC).
It was found that at high NA, the fact that the
off-axis FZP has to cross the cover glass of the spec-
imen before illuminating it introduced a fair amount
of aberrations and distortions. Furthermore it also
changed the spatial frequency offset by an amount
difficult to predict. In principle, if the optical proper-
ties of the specimen and its mounting environment
are known, this effect can be compensated for numer-
ically. We chose to eliminate these difficulties by us-
ing a specimen without cover glass. The specimen
used in the demonstration in Section 4 is a cluster of
1 ?m diameter fluorescent beads (R0100 Polymer
Microspheres, Duke Scientific, Palo Alto, Calif., USA)
smeared on a microscope slide without a cover slip.
To assess the gain in the resolution of the system,
we used the reconstruction of a subresolution pin-
hole (0.5 ?m diameter)toestimatethesizeofthePSF.
With a NA of 0.42, the theoretical Rayleigh resolution
limit of the objective is 1.22?EM?2NA ? 0.9 ?m. ?EM
? 600 nm is the emission wavelength of the beads.
The wrapped phase of the on-line hologram of the
of a 0.5 ?m diameter pinhole. The scale bar is 10 ?m. The phase
distribution has a radius ?18 ?m, a Fresnel number ?12, and a
radius of curvature ?50 ?m. (b) Amplitude of the reconstruction of
the 0.5 ?m pinhole using the on-line hologram. FWHM ?1.0 ?m.
(Color online) (a) Wrapped phase of the on-line hologram
grams of the 0.5 ?m pinhole illustrating the idea of pupil synthe-
sis. The scale bar is 10 ?m. (b) Amplitude of the reconstruction of
the 0.5 ?m pinhole using the composite off-axis holograms. FWHM
(Color online) (a) Wrapped phase of three off-axis holo-
996APPLIED OPTICS ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? 20 February 2007
0.5 ?m diameter pinhole is shown in Fig. 2(a), and
its reconstruction is shown in Fig. 2(b). The holo-
gram has a Fresnel number F ? 12, and a radius
a ? 18 ?m. Using the relation F ? a2??EXz0with
an excitation wavelength ?EX? 532 nm, the radius
of curvature of the hologram is found to be z0?
50 ?m, and its equivalent NA is a?z0? 0.35. This
leads to an expected theoretical Rayleigh limit
?0.9 ?m, which is close to the Rayleigh resolution of
the objective. The observation that the smaller equiv-
alent NA of the hologram leads to the same resolution
limit as that of the objective is attributable to the fact
that the objective forms an image at the emission
wavelength while the hologram is formed at the
shorter excitation wavelength. A dye with a larger
Stokes shift would lead to an even larger gain. The
reconstruction shown in Fig. 2(b) has a FWHM equal
to ?1.0 ?m. Since this is the convolution of the ac-
tual PSF with the 0.5 ?m pinhole, the size of the
experimental PSF is estimated to be ?0.9 ?m, or
smaller. Three off-axis holograms of the pinhole
were recorded with a spatial frequency offset ?0?
?MAX ? 0.66 ?m?1in directions 120° apart. The
wrapped phases of the three holograms are combined
in Fig. 3(a) to illustrate the wider spatial frequency
coverage of the composite hologram. The reconstruc-
tion of the pinhole from this hologram is shown in
Fig. 3(b). Its FWHM is ?0.7 ?m. The actual size of
the PSF of the composite hologram is thus estimated
a collection of ?1.0 ?m fluorescent beads (excitation?emission
wavelengths ? 532 nm?600 nm) at the best focus distance of
47.5 ?m from the focal plane of the objective. The scale bar is 5 ?m.
Bead clusters are just barely resolved. (b) Same reconstruction at
a focus distance of 49 ?m. The two planes are within the Rayleigh
range of the on-axis scanning FZP.
the reconstructions of three off-axis holograms recorded with off
sets 120° apart. The scale bar is 5 ?m. (a) Best focus at 47.5 ?m
from the focal plane of the objective. (b) Same reconstruction at a
focus distance of 49 ?m. The distance between the two planes is
close to the Rayleigh range of the synthesized FZP, and different
bead clusters are focused in different planes.
(Color online) Coherent sum of the complex amplitudes of
20 February 2007 ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? APPLIED OPTICS997
to be smaller than ?0.6 ?m, which corresponds to an
equivalent NA larger than ?0.54. The reduction of
the resolution limit by a factor ?0.6 or smaller could
be further improved by combining more than three
holograms. If the off-axis FZP are introduced on the
specimen through the objective, as done in the exper-
iment, we can expect a resolution limit down to a
factor ?0.5 that of the objective. Further improve-
ment is possible in principle down to the theoretical
limit ??2, by introducing off-axis FZP externally (al-
beit this may involve some technical difficulties).
To demonstrate the reality of the achieved resolu-
tion improvement, we chose a sample consisting of
fluorescent beads with a diameter slightly larger
than the ?0.9 ?m resolution limit of the objective at
the emission wavelength, and slightly larger than the
?0.9 ?m resolution limit of the on-axis hologram at
the excitation wavelength. The expectation is that
the reconstruction of the on-axis hologram will show,
at best, barely unresolved beads, while the composite
reconstruction should reveal beads that are resolved.
The three holograms of the fluorescent beads were
recorded in reflection, reconstructed individually,
and the amplitudes of their reconstructions were
added coherently. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the re-
constructions of the on-axis hologram in two different
planes. As expected, individual beads are detected in
the best plane of focus [z ? 47.5 ?m in Fig. 4(a)], but
the clusters are not resolved. Shifting the focal plane
to z ? 49 ?m does not reveal anything different be-
cause the two planes with an axial separation of
1.5 ?m are well within the Rayleigh focal distance of
?3.5 ?m. The composite reconstructions of the three
off-axis holograms in the same two focal planes are
struction of a 0.5 ?m diameter pinhole from the on-axis hologram.
The phase profile is typical of an Airy pattern with a central lobe
diameter ?1.5 ?m. The scale bar is 1 ?m.
(a) Absolute value and (b) wrapped phase of the recon-
coherent sum of the reconstructions of a 0.5 ?m diameter pinhole
from the three off-axis holograms. The threefold symmetry of the
destructive interference results in a narrower amplitude distribu-
tion (a), and a central lobe diameter ?1.0 ?m. The scale bar is
(a) Absolute value and (b) wrapped phase of the
998APPLIED OPTICS ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? 20 February 2007
shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b). The clusters of beads are
now well resolved. Furthermore Figs. 5(a) and 5(b)
reveal that different clusters are in best focus in dif-
ferent planes. This is to be expected since the two
planes are 1.5 ?m apart, while the axial Rayleigh
distance of the composite hologram is ?1.8 ?m.
It is interesting to observe how the gain in trans-
verse and axial resolution is a result of the mutual
interference of the complex amplitudes of the recon-
structions of the off-axis holograms. This is illus-
trated in Figs. 6 and 7, which show the absolute
values and the wrapped phases of the reconstructions
of the 0.5 ?m pinhole for the on-axis hologram (Fig.
6), and for the three combined off-axis holograms
(Fig. 7). The middle gray in the phase figures repre-
sents a phase zero, while the black and the white
represent a phase ?? and ??, respectively. Figure 6
is that of a typical Airy pattern. Combining the com-
plex amplitudes of the three off-axis holograms leads
to destructive interferences at the rim of the main
lobe of the Airy disc, leading to a narrowing of its size.
The threefold symmetry of the destructive interfer-
ences is clearly identified in Fig. 7.
We have shown experimentally that it is possible to
overcome the spatial resolution limit of the objective
in holographic microscopy by combining a number of
off-axis scanning holograms to synthesize a pupil
area larger than that of the objective. The principle
of superresolution by holographic superposition and
synthetic aperture has a long history, which is briefly
reviewed. The implementation of this principle using
incoherent holographic scanning microscopy is dem-
onstrated by using holograms of fluorescent beads.
This research was funded in part by a grant from
the National Institute of Health, Office of Extra-
from the National Science Foundation, grant DBI-
0420382. J. Rosen’s research was supported in part
by the Israel Sciences Foundation, grant 119-03.
1. G. Toraldo di Francia, “Super-gain antennas and optical re-
solving power,” Nuovo Cimento, Suppl. 9, 426–438 (1952).
2. G. Toraldo di Francia, “Resolving power and information,” J.
Opt. Soc. Am. 45, 497–501 (1955).
Soc. Am. 59, 799–804 (1969).
4. W. Lukosz, “Optical systems with resolving power exceeding
the classical limits,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1463–1472 (1966).
5. W. Lukosz, “Optical systems with resolving power exceeding
the classical limits, II,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 932–941 (1967).
6. I. J. Cox and J. R. Sheppard, “Information capacity and reso-
lution in an optical system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3, 1152–1158
7. D. Mendlovic and A. W. Lohmann, “Space-bandwidth product ad-
aptation and its application to superresolution: fundamentals,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 558–562 (1997).
8. D. Mendlovic, A. W. Lohmann, and Z. Zalevsky, “Space-
bandwidth product adaptation and its application to super-
resolution: examples,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 563–567 (1997).
9. Z. Zalevsky, D. Mendlovics, and A. W. Lohmann, “Optical
systems with improved resolving power,” in Progress in Op-
tics, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 2000), Vol. 40, pp. 271–341.
10. T. Leizerson, S. G. Lipson, and V. Sarafi, “Superresolution in
far-field imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 436–443 (2002).
11. M. A. Grimm and A. W. Lohmann, “Superresolution image for
Z. Zalevsky, “One-dimensional superresolution optical system
for temporally restricted objects,” Appl. Opt. 36, 2353–2359
13. A. Shemer, D. Mendlovics, Z. Zalevsky, J. Garcia, and P.
Garcia-Martinez, “Superresolving optical system with time
multiplexing and computer decoding,” Appl. Opt. 38, 7245–
14. A. W. Lohmann and D. P. Paris, “Superresolution for nonbi-
refringent objects,” Appl. Opt. 3, 1037–1043 (1964).
15. E. N. Leith, D. Angell, and C. P. Kuei, “Superresolution by
incoherent to coherent conversion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A4, 1050–
16. R. W. Gerchberg, “Super-resolution through error energy re-
duction,” Opt. Acta 21, 709–720 (1974).
in Progress in Optics, E. Wolf, ed. (Elsevier, 1996), Vol. 36,
18. B. Colicchio, O. Haeberle, C. Xu, A. Dieterlen, and G. Jung,
“Improvement of the LLS and MAP deconvolution algorithms
by automatic determination of optimal regularization param-
eters and prefiltering of original data,” Opt. Commun. 244,
19. P. C. Sun and E. N. Leith, “Superresolution by spatial–
temporal encoding methods,” Appl. Opt. 31, 4857–4862 (1992).
20. M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Surpassing the lateral resolution limit
by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy,” J.
Microsc. 198, 82–87 (2000).
21. M. A. A. Neil, R. Juskaitis, and T. Wilson, “Method of obtaining
optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional
microscope,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1905–1907 (1997).
resolution enhancement in fluorescence microscopy by har-
monic excitation,” Opt. Lett. 26, 828–830 (2001).
23. J. Garcia, Z. Zalevsky, and D. Fixler, “Synthetic aperture su-
perresolution by speckle pattern projection,” Opt. Express 13,
24. O. Haeberle and B. Simon, “Improving the lateral resolution in
confocal fluorescence microscopy using laterally interfering ex-
citation beams,” Opt. Commun. 259, 400–408 (2006).
Kowalczyk, “Three-dimensional superresolution by annular
binary filters,” Opt. Commun 165, 267–278 (1999).
26. M. Gu, T. Tannous, and C. R. J. Sheppard, “Improved axial
resolution in focal fluorescence microscopy with annular pu-
pils,” Opt. Commun. 110, 533–539 (1994).
27. M. Martinez-Corral, M. T. Caballero, E. H. K. Stelzer, and J.
Swoger, “Tailoring the axial shape of the point spread function
using the Toraldo concept,” Opt. Express 10, 98–103 (2002).
28. J. W. Goodman and R. W. Lawrence, “Digital image informa-
tion from electronically detected holograms,” Appl. Phys. Lett.
11, 77–79 (1967).
29. T. Sato, M. Ueda, and G. Yamagishi, “Superresolution micro-
scope using electrical superposition of holograms,” Appl. Opt.
13, 406–408 (1973).
30. M. Ueda, T. Sato, and M. Kondo, “Superresolution by multiple
superposition of images holograms having different carrier
frequencies,” Opt. Acta 20, 403–410 (1973).
31. X. Chen and S. R. Brueck, “Imaging interferometric lithogra-
phy approaching the resolution limit of the optics,” Opt. Lett.
24, 124–126 (1999).
32. F. Le Clerc, M. Gross, and L. Collot, “Synthetic-aperture ex-
20 February 2007 ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? APPLIED OPTICS999
periment in the visible with on-axis digital heterodyne holog-
raphy,” Opt. Lett. 26, 1550–1552 (2001).
33. J. R. Hassig, “Digital off-axis holography with synthetic aper-
ture,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2179–2181 (2002).
34. C. J. Schwarz, Y. Kuznetsova, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Imaging
interferometric microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 28, 1424–1426 (2003).
35. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia,
“Single step superresolution by interferometric imaging,”
Opt. Express 12, 2589–2596 (2004).
36. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, and J. Garcia, “Superesolution optical
system by common path interferometry,” Opt. Express 14,
37. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia, “Su-
perresolved imaging in digital holography by superposition of
tilted wavefronts,” Appl. Opt. 45, 822–828 (2006).
38. E. Cuche, F. Bevilacqua, and C. Depeursinge, “Digital holog-
raphy for quantitative phase contrast imaging,” Opt. Lett. 24,
39. E. Cuche, P. Marquet, and C. Depeursinge, “Simultaneous
amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase-contrast micros-
copy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holo-
grams,” Appl. Opt. 38, 6994–7001 (1999).
40. G. Indebetouw, A. El Maghnouji, and R. Foster, “Scanning
holographic microscopy with transverse resolution exceeding
the Rayleigh limit and extended depth of focus,” J. Opt. Soc.
Am. A 22, 892–898 (2005).
41. G. Indebetouw and W. Zhong, “Scanning holographic micros-
copy of three-dimensional fluorescent specimens,” J. Opt. Soc.
Am. A 23, 1699–1707 (2006).
42. G. Indebetouw, Y. Tada, and L. Leacock, “Quantitative phase
imaging with scanning holographic microscopy:
assessment,” Biomed. Eng. Online 5, doi:10.1186/1475-925x-
43. G. Indebetouw, W. Zhong, and D. Chamberlin-Long, “Point-
spread function synthesis in scanning holographic microscopy,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1708–1717 (2006).
44. G. Indebetouw, “A posteriori quasi-sectioning of the three-
dimensional reconstructions of scanning holographic micros-
copy,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2657–2661 (2006).
45. G. Indebetouw, P. Klysubun, T. Kim, and T.-C. Poon, “Imaging
properties of scanning holographic microscopy,” J. Opt. Soc.
Am. A 17, 380–390 (2000).
holography,” Opt. Express 14, 4280–4285 (2006).
47. I. Yamaguchi and T. Zhang, “Phase-shifting digital hologra-
phy,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1268–1270 (1997).
48. I. Yamaguchi, J.-I. Kato, S. Ohta, and J. Mizuno, “Image for-
mation in phase-shifting digital holography and application to
microscopy,” Appl. Opt. 40, 6177–6186 (2001).
49. J. Swoger, M. Martinez-Corral, J. Huysken, and E. H. K.
Stelzer, “Optical scanning holography as a technique for
high-resolution three-dimensional biological microscopy,” J.
Opt. Soc. Am. A 19, 1910–1918 (2002).
50. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd ed.
51. C.W. McCutchen,“Generalized
dimensional diffraction images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 240–244
52. M. Gu, Advance in Optical Imaging Theory (Springer,
aperture and three-
1000APPLIED OPTICS ? Vol. 46, No. 6 ? 20 February 2007