Article

Diagnosis and initial management of obstructive sleep apnea without polysomnography: a randomized validation study.

University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 02/2007; 146(3):157-66.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Polysomnography (PSG), despite limited availability and high cost, is currently recommended for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea and titration of effective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
To test the utility of a diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with ambulatory CPAP titration in initial management of obstructive sleep apnea.
A randomized, controlled, open-label trial that compared standard PSG with ambulatory CPAP titration in high-risk patients identified by a diagnostic algorithm.
A tertiary referral sleep disorders program in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
68 patients with a high pretest probability of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] >15 episodes/h) identified by sequential application of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, Sleep Apnea Clinical Score, and overnight oximetry.
Patients were randomly assigned to PSG or ambulatory titration by using a combination of auto-CPAP and overnight oximetry. They were observed for 3 months.
Apnea-hypopnea index on CPAP, ESS score, quality of life, and CPAP adherence.
The PSG and ambulatory groups had similar median BMI (38 kg/m2), age (55 years), ESS score (14 points), and respiratory disturbance index (31 episodes of respiratory disturbance/h). Each episode is determined by a computer algorithm based on analysis of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry. After 3 months, there were no differences in the primary outcome, AHI on CPAP (median, 3.2 vs. 2.5; difference, 0.8/h [95% CI, -0.9 to 2.3]) (P = 0.31), between the PSG and ambulatory groups, or in the secondary outcomes, ESS score, Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, and CPAP. Adherence to CPAP therapy was better in the ambulatory group than in the PSG group (median, 5.4 vs. 6.0; difference, -1.12 h/night [CI, -2.0 to 0.2]) (P = 0.021).
In the initial management of patients with a high probability of obstructive sleep apnea, PSG confers no advantage over the ambulatory approach in terms of diagnosis and CPAP titration. The ambulatory approach may improve adherence to treatment. When access to PSG is inadequate, the ambulatory approach can be used to expedite management of patients most in need of treatment.

0 Followers
 · 
225 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex sleep apnea (CompSA) is defined as the development of central events during a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration in a patient with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We hypothesized that patients with OSA on chronic opioids would fail a CPAP titration more frequently than patients with OSA not on opioid therapy and that the increased failure rate would be due to a greater prevalence of CompSA. In a retrospective chart review, we identified 58 patients with OSA on opioids and compared them to 150 patients with OSA not on opioids. CPAP titration failure was defined as an apnea‐hypopnea index greater than 5/h at all CPAP pressures tested. CompSA was defined as the development of a central apnea index greater than 5/h during the CPAP titration study.
    Sleep and Biological Rhythms 04/2014; 12(2). DOI:10.1111/sbr.12051 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: La CPAP es el tratamiento de elección en pacientes con SAHS. Los pacientes con un IAH > 5 y síntomas, son susceptibles de tratamiento con CPAP nasal. Si no tienen síntomas, con patología cardiovascular, se debe considerar el tratamiento si el IAH >30, especialmente en pacientes con edad inferior a 70 años. Puesto que no es un tratamiento curativo, debe usarse de forma continuada, y para esto debemos hacer un ajuste de la presión óptima, para la que es imprescindible una adecuada información y preparación del enfermo, pudiendo realizarse diversas técnicas para el ajuste. La PSG completa en el laboratorio de sueño es la que mejor asegura la corrección de todos los fenómenos patológicos (respiratorios y neurológicos). Pero debido a lo costoso y largo del procedimiento y a las largas listas de espera se han propuesto otras opciones como son la PSG en noche partida para pacientes con IAH>20, el ajuste empírico mediante fórmula matemática, que puede usarse de manera provisional, a la espera de titulación, y un sistema de Auto-CPAP validado y con análisis visual (Normativa SEPAR 2010). Uno de los procedimientos más extendidos, para titular la presión de CPAP es el uso de equipos de CPAP automática. Existe una gran diversidad de equipos, con comportamientos diferentes, ya que utilizan un algoritmo de presión diferente, y variables distintas. Sin embargo, en otros estudios clínicos no se han encontrado diferencias. Estos, miden varias variables respiratorias, para detectar anormalidades respiratorias. Básicamente existen 3 variables de medida: flujo, ronquido e impedancia (valorada mediante oscilación forzada). Aunque inicialmente no todos los equipos utilizaban todas las variables, hoy la mayoría utilizan todas ellas con diferentes algoritmos.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. There are many studies regarding unnecessary polysomnography (PSG) when obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is suspected. In order to reduce unnecessary PSG, this study aims to predict the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) via simple clinical data for patients who complain of OSAS symptoms. Method. Demographic, anthropometric, physical examination and laboratory data of a total of 390 patients (290 men, average age 50 ± 11) who were subject to diagnostic PSG were obtained and evaluated retrospectively. The relationship between these data and the PSG results was analyzed. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed step by step to identify independent AHI predictors. Results. Useful parameters were found in this analysis in terms of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), neck circumference (NC), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), and tonsil size (TS) to predict the AHI. The formula derived from these parameters was the predicted AHI = (0.797 × BMI) + (2.286 × NC) - (1.272 × SpO2) + (5.114 × TS) + (0.314 × WC). Conclusion. This study showed a strong correlation between AHI score and indicators of obesity. This formula, in terms of predicting the AHI for patients who complain about snoring, witnessed apneas, and excessive daytime sleepiness, may be used to predict OSAS prior to PSG and prevent unnecessary PSG.
    International Journal of Otolaryngology 10/2014; 2014:438376. DOI:10.1155/2014/438376

Preview

Download
9 Downloads