Article

Early factor VIII exposure and subsequent inhibitor development in children with severe haemophilia A.

Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.
Haemophilia (Impact Factor: 3.17). 04/2007; 13(2):149-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01418.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent reports have suggested that the incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia is the highest in those first exposed to factor VIII under 6 months of age. In this study, we investigated inhibitor development in children first exposed to FVIII as neonates and also examined the effect of other genetic and environmental variables. Three hundred and forty-eight children with severe haemophilia A were investigated. Inhibitors developed in 68 of 348 (20%), with 34 of 348 (10%) high titre inhibitors. The incidence in relation to initial FVIII exposure was: <1 month nine of 35 (26%), 1-6 months 13 of 51 (25%), 6-12 months 27 of 130 (21%), 12-18 months 13 of 66 (20%) and >18 months six of 66 (9%). While we observed a significant difference in inhibitor development and age at first exposure across all age groups (P = 0.018), no significant difference was observed in children treated at different time points during the first year of life (P = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for high titre inhibitors. There was also no difference in the incidence of inhibitors in relation to initial FVIII exposure in a subgroup of 144 children with the intron 22 mutation. Inhibitors developed more frequently in those initially treated with recombinant when compared with plasma-derived FVIII (P = 0.006) and in those with a major molecular defect (P = 0.009). In this study, exposure to FVIII during the neonatal period was not associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors than those treated later during the first year of life. Initial treatment with recombinant FVIII and the presence of a major molecular defect were the most important variables affecting inhibitor development.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
78 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability to switch between coagulation factors safely is of common interest to haemophilia patients and treating physicians. This is the first formal prospective comparative evaluation of safety, efficacy and incremental recovery of a plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX) and a recombinant FIX (rFIX) in the same haemophilia B patients following a switch from pdFIX Immunine® to a recently developed rFIX Bax326 product. Patients (aged <65 years) who completed a pretreatment study which prospectively documented the exposure to Immunine® and monitored FIX inhibitors while receiving prophylactic treatment were transitioned into pivotal (patients aged 12–65 years) and paediatric (patients aged <12 years) clinical studies investigating prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Bax326. None of the 44 patients developed inhibitory or specific binding anti-FIX antibodies during the course of the studies. A total of 38 unrelated adverse events (AEs) were occurred in 20/44 (45.5%) subjects during the Immunine® study. Following a switch to Bax326, 51 AEs were reported in 25/44 (56.8%) subjects. The incidence of AEs related to Bax326 treatment (two episodes of dysgeusia in one patient) was low (2.3%); there were no serious adverse reactions. The comparison between Immunine® and Bax326 demonstrated analogous haemostatic characteristics and annualized bleeding rates. Overall, there is direct evidence indicating a safe and clinically effective transition from a pdFIX (Immunine®) to a newly developed rFIX (Bax3261) for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in previously treated patients of all age cohorts with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B.
    Haemophilia 04/2014; · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inhibitor development is the most problematic and costly complication of haemophilia treatment. Inhibitor development depends on a complex multifactorial immune response that is influenced by patient- and treatment-related factors. Considerable research is focussed on inhibitor development as well as the mechanism of eradication through immune tolerance induction (ITI). Once an inhibitor develops, two general treatment options are available: to treat acute bleeds through bypassing agents, and to eradicate the inhibitor permanently through ITI. Previously untreated haemophilia A patients (PUPs) are at greatest risk of inhibitor development within the first 20 exposure days to factor VIII (FVIII). Inhibitor incidence in PUP studies ranges from 0% to as high as 52%. Plasma-derived FVIII concentrates have repeatedly been shown in cohort studies to be associated with a decreased inhibitor risk compared with recombinant FVIII concentrates, but results from randomized clinical trials are lacking; although one such trial is ongoing (SIPPET study). The occurrence of an inhibitor represents a major hardship for the patient and his family, and can result in high morbidity and a significant reduction in quality of life. Inhibitor eradication often requires the need for demanding and expensive treatment strategies aimed at inducing immune tolerance or bypassing the inhibitor. The role of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in immunoprotection is currently under review. The high-purity, pasteurized, plasma-derived FVIII concentrate, Beriate(®), contains sufficient amounts of VWF to not only bind all FVIII molecules but also provide additional FVIII binding sites, and may have additional beneficial effects that reduce the general immunogenicity of FVIII.
    Thrombosis Research 04/2014; · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with haemophilia A (and their physicians) may be reluctant to switch factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, often due to concerns about increasing the risk of inhibitors; this reluctance to switch may contribute to patients missing the clinical benefits provided by the arrival of new factor VIII products. This topic was explored at the Eleventh Zurich Haemophilia Forum. Clinical scenarios for which product switching may be cause for concern were discussed; when there is a clinical need, there are no absolute contraindications to switching, but some patients (e.g. previously untreated patients and those undergoing elective surgery), may require more careful consideration. Both patient and physician surveys indicate that the reluctance to switch, and the fear of inhibitor development, does not appear to be evidence based. The evaluation of more recent data did not support previous studies suggesting that particular products (e.g. recombinant vs. plasma-derived, full length vs. B-domain modified) may be associated with increased risk. In addition, data from three national products switches showed that switching was not associated with increased inhibitor risk, but highlighted the need for regular inhibitor testing and for a centralised, unbiased database of inhibitor incidence. To conclude, current evidence does not suggest that switching products significantly influences inhibitor development.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    European Journal Of Haematology 08/2014; · 2.55 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads
Available from