Article

Early factor VIII exposure and subsequent inhibitor development in children with severe haemophilia A.

Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, UK.
Haemophilia (Impact Factor: 3.17). 04/2007; 13(2):149-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01418.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent reports have suggested that the incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia is the highest in those first exposed to factor VIII under 6 months of age. In this study, we investigated inhibitor development in children first exposed to FVIII as neonates and also examined the effect of other genetic and environmental variables. Three hundred and forty-eight children with severe haemophilia A were investigated. Inhibitors developed in 68 of 348 (20%), with 34 of 348 (10%) high titre inhibitors. The incidence in relation to initial FVIII exposure was: <1 month nine of 35 (26%), 1-6 months 13 of 51 (25%), 6-12 months 27 of 130 (21%), 12-18 months 13 of 66 (20%) and >18 months six of 66 (9%). While we observed a significant difference in inhibitor development and age at first exposure across all age groups (P = 0.018), no significant difference was observed in children treated at different time points during the first year of life (P = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for high titre inhibitors. There was also no difference in the incidence of inhibitors in relation to initial FVIII exposure in a subgroup of 144 children with the intron 22 mutation. Inhibitors developed more frequently in those initially treated with recombinant when compared with plasma-derived FVIII (P = 0.006) and in those with a major molecular defect (P = 0.009). In this study, exposure to FVIII during the neonatal period was not associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors than those treated later during the first year of life. Initial treatment with recombinant FVIII and the presence of a major molecular defect were the most important variables affecting inhibitor development.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
61 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability to switch between coagulation factors safely is of common interest to haemophilia patients and treating physicians. This is the first formal prospective comparative evaluation of safety, efficacy and incremental recovery of a plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX) and a recombinant FIX (rFIX) in the same haemophilia B patients following a switch from pdFIX Immunine® to a recently developed rFIX Bax326 product. Patients (aged <65 years) who completed a pretreatment study which prospectively documented the exposure to Immunine® and monitored FIX inhibitors while receiving prophylactic treatment were transitioned into pivotal (patients aged 12–65 years) and paediatric (patients aged <12 years) clinical studies investigating prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Bax326. None of the 44 patients developed inhibitory or specific binding anti-FIX antibodies during the course of the studies. A total of 38 unrelated adverse events (AEs) were occurred in 20/44 (45.5%) subjects during the Immunine® study. Following a switch to Bax326, 51 AEs were reported in 25/44 (56.8%) subjects. The incidence of AEs related to Bax326 treatment (two episodes of dysgeusia in one patient) was low (2.3%); there were no serious adverse reactions. The comparison between Immunine® and Bax326 demonstrated analogous haemostatic characteristics and annualized bleeding rates. Overall, there is direct evidence indicating a safe and clinically effective transition from a pdFIX (Immunine®) to a newly developed rFIX (Bax3261) for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in previously treated patients of all age cohorts with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B.
    Haemophilia 04/2014; · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inhibitor development is the most problematic and costly complication of haemophilia treatment. Inhibitor development depends on a complex multifactorial immune response that is influenced by patient- and treatment-related factors. Considerable research is focussed on inhibitor development as well as the mechanism of eradication through immune tolerance induction (ITI). Once an inhibitor develops, two general treatment options are available: to treat acute bleeds through bypassing agents, and to eradicate the inhibitor permanently through ITI. Previously untreated haemophilia A patients (PUPs) are at greatest risk of inhibitor development within the first 20 exposure days to factor VIII (FVIII). Inhibitor incidence in PUP studies ranges from 0% to as high as 52%. Plasma-derived FVIII concentrates have repeatedly been shown in cohort studies to be associated with a decreased inhibitor risk compared with recombinant FVIII concentrates, but results from randomized clinical trials are lacking; although one such trial is ongoing (SIPPET study). The occurrence of an inhibitor represents a major hardship for the patient and his family, and can result in high morbidity and a significant reduction in quality of life. Inhibitor eradication often requires the need for demanding and expensive treatment strategies aimed at inducing immune tolerance or bypassing the inhibitor. The role of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in immunoprotection is currently under review. The high-purity, pasteurized, plasma-derived FVIII concentrate, Beriate(®), contains sufficient amounts of VWF to not only bind all FVIII molecules but also provide additional FVIII binding sites, and may have additional beneficial effects that reduce the general immunogenicity of FVIII.
    Thrombosis Research 04/2014; · 3.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hemophilia A is a congenital, recessive, X-linked bleeding disorder that is managed with infusions of plasma-derived or recombinant factor (F) VIII. The primary considerations in FVIII replacement therapy today are the: 1) immunogenicity of FVIII concentrates, 2) role of longer-acting FVIII products, 3) prophylactic use of FVIII in children and adults with severe hemophilia A, and 4) affordability and availability of FVIII products. Improving patient outcomes by increasing the use of FVIII prophylaxis, preventing or eliminating FVIII inhibitors, and expanding access to FVIII concentrates in developing countries are the major challenges confronting clinicians who care for patients with hemophilia A.
    Expert Review of Hematology 04/2014; · 2.38 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from