Article

Similar neural representations of the target for saccades and perception during search.

Vision and Image Understanding Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Journal of Neuroscience (impact factor: 7.11). 03/2007; 27(6):1266-70. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3975-06.2007 pp.1266-70
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Are the body's actions and the mind's perceptions the result of shared neural processing, or are they performed largely independently? The brain has two major processing streams, and some have proposed that this division segregates visual processing for action and perception. The ventral pathway is claimed to support conscious experience (perception), whereas the dorsal pathway is claimed to support the control of movement (action). Others have argued that perception and action share much of their visual processing within the primate cortex. During visual search, the brain performs a sophisticated deployment of eye movements (saccadic actions) to gather information to subserve perceptual judgments. The relationship between the neural mechanisms mediating perception and action in visual search remains unexplored. Here, we investigate the visual representation of target information in the human brain, both for perceptual decisions and for saccadic actions during visual search. We use classification image analysis, a form of reverse correlation, to estimate the behavioral receptive fields of the visual mechanisms responsible for saccadic and perceptual responses during the same visual search task. Results show that the behavioral receptive fields mediating the perceptual decisions are indistinguishable from those driving the oculomotor decisions, suggesting that similar neural mechanisms are responsible for both perception and oculomotor action during search. Diverging target representations would result in an inefficient coupling between eye movement planning and perceptual judgments. Thus, a common target representation would be more optimal and might be expected to have evolved through natural selection in the neural systems responsible for visual search.

0 0
 · 
1 Bookmark
 · 
33 Views
  • Source
    Article: Evolution and optimality of similar neural mechanisms for perception and action during search.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A prevailing theory proposes that the brain's two visual pathways, the ventral and dorsal, lead to differing visual processing and world representations for conscious perception than those for action. Others have claimed that perception and action share much of their visual processing. But which of these two neural architectures is favored by evolution? Successful visual search is life-critical and here we investigate the evolution and optimality of neural mechanisms mediating perception and eye movement actions for visual search in natural images. We implement an approximation to the ideal Bayesian searcher with two separate processing streams, one controlling the eye movements and the other stream determining the perceptual search decisions. We virtually evolved the neural mechanisms of the searchers' two separate pathways built from linear combinations of primary visual cortex receptive fields (V1) by making the simulated individuals' probability of survival depend on the perceptual accuracy finding targets in cluttered backgrounds. We find that for a variety of targets, backgrounds, and dependence of target detectability on retinal eccentricity, the mechanisms of the searchers' two processing streams converge to similar representations showing that mismatches in the mechanisms for perception and eye movements lead to suboptimal search. Three exceptions which resulted in partial or no convergence were a case of an organism for which the targets are equally detectable across the retina, an organism with sufficient time to foveate all possible target locations, and a strict two-pathway model with no interconnections and differential pre-filtering based on parvocellular and magnocellular lateral geniculate cell properties. Thus, similar neural mechanisms for perception and eye movement actions during search are optimal and should be expected from the effects of natural selection on an organism with limited time to search for food that is not equi-detectable across its retina and interconnected perception and action neural pathways.
    PLoS Computational Biology 01/2010; 6(9). · 5.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Object displays for identifying multidimensional outliers within a crowded visual periphery
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation - in press

Keywords

behavioral receptive fields mediating
 
common target representation
 
Diverging target representations
 
division segregates visual processing
 
dorsal pathway
 
eye movement planning
 
neural mechanisms mediating perception
 
neural processing
 
oculomotor action
 
oculomotor decisions
 
perceptual decisions
 
perceptual responses
 
similar neural mechanisms
 
subserve perceptual judgments
 
support conscious experience
 
target information
 
ventral pathway
 
visual processing
 
visual representation
 
visual search task