Psychiatric disorders and labor market outcomes: evidence from the National Latino and Asian American Study

National Bureau of Economic Research, USA.
Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.14). 10/2007; 16(10):1069-90. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1210
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper investigates to what extent psychiatric disorders and mental distress affect labor market outcomes in two rapidly growing populations that have not been studied to date-ethnic minorities of Latino and Asian descent, most of whom are immigrants. Using data from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS), we examine the labor market effects of meeting diagnostic criteria for any psychiatric disorder in the past 12 months as well as the effects of psychiatric distress in the past year. The labor market outcomes analyzed are current employment status, the number of weeks worked in the past year among those who are employed, and having at least one work absence in the past month among those who are employed. Among Latinos, psychiatric disorders and mental distress are associated with detrimental effects on employment and absenteeism, similar to effects found in previous analyses of mostly white, American born populations. Among Asians, we find more mixed evidence that psychiatric disorders and mental distress detract from labor market outcomes. Our findings suggest that reducing disparities and expanding access to effective treatment may have significant labor market benefits-not just for majority populations, as has been demonstrated, but also for Asians and Latinos.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Little research has examined the interactive effect of cancer status and race/ethnicity on mental health. As such, the present study examined the mental health of adults, 18 and over, diagnosed with cancer. This study examined the extent to which a cancer diagnosis is related to poorer mental health because it erodes finances and the extent to which the mental health impact of cancer differs across racial/ethnic groups. Furthermore, this study aimed to test the stress process model, which posits that the proliferation of stress can lead to mental illness and this process can differ across racial/ethnic groups.
    BMC Public Health 09/2014; 14(1):930. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-930 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Demographic Research 01/2014; 30:111-150. DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.4 · 1.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To what extent does poor mental health affect employment outcomes? Answering this question involves multiple technical difficulties: two-way causality between health and work, unobservable confounding factors and measurement error in survey measures of mental health. We attempt to overcome these difficulties by combining 10 waves of high-quality panel data with an instrumental variable model that allows for individual-level fixed effects. We focus on the extensive margin of employment, and we find evidence that a one-standard-deviation decline in mental health reduces employment by 30 percentage points. Further investigations suggest that this effect is predominantly a supply rather than a demand-side response and is larger for older than young workers. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Health Economics 09/2014; 23(9). DOI:10.1002/hec.3083 · 2.14 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014