Guidelines for the conduction of follow-up studies measuring injury-related disability.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 03/2007; 62(2):534-50. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31802e70c7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Scientific knowledge on functional outcome after injury is limited. During the past decade, a variety of measures have been used at various moments in different study populations. Guidelines are needed to increase comparability between studies.
A working group of the European Consumer Safety Association conducted a literature review of empirical studies into injury-related disability (1995-2005). We included injury from all levels of severity and selected studies using generic health status measures with both short-term and long-term follow up. The results were used as input for a consensus procedure toward the development of guidelines for defining the study populations, selecting the health status measures, selecting the timings of the assessments, and data collection procedures.
The group reached consensus on a common core of health status measures and assessment moments. The group advises to use a combination of EuroQol-5D and Health Utilities Mark III in all studies on injury-related disability. This combination covers all relevant health domains, is applicable in all kinds of injury populations and in widely different age ranges, provides a link with utility scores, and has several practical advantages (e.g., brevity, availability in different languages). For specific types of injury, the common core may be supplemented by injury-specific measures. The group advises a common core of assessments at 1, 2, 4, and 12 months after injury.
Our guidelines should be tested and may lead to improved and more consistent epidemiologic data on the incidence, severity, and duration of injury-related disability.

Download full-text


Available from: Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Jul 04, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of upper extremity injuries (UEIs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adult patients compared with victims of other types of injuries and with the general population, in order to establish recovery patterns of different types of UEIs and determine predictors for suboptimal outcome in the long term.
    Injury 07/2014; 45(11). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.016 · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Major trauma is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children of developed countries. Little research has been done about the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in these children. The aim of the current research is to describe the HRQL of children in the long term after major trauma and to compare it with healthy peers. Methods: A prospective cohort study of severely injured children (ISS ≥ 16, age < 16 years) who survived the trauma and were admitted to the emergency department of a Dutch level 1 trauma center in 1999 and 2000 (n = 40) was conducted. Between 6 and 8 years after trauma (mean 7.3, SD 0.7 years), outcome was assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0), the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Results: The mean age at the time of the accident was 8.9 years (SD 4.6 years), the mean ISS was 24.9 (SD 11.1), and 25 (63%) cases were male; 28 out of 40 patients were followed up. The mean score on the PedsQL was 81.2 and this did not differ significantly from the norm value. On the EQ-5D, more health problems were reported than in a healthy reference population. The mean EQ-VAS score was 79.4 and was significantly lower than in healthy peers. The lowest scores on the PedsQL and the EQ-VAS were seen in teenagers and in respondents with spinal cord and/or severe cerebral injury. Conclusion: The results on HRQL in children in the long term after major trauma are inconclusive. Special attention should be given to teenagers with spinal cord or severe cerebral injury who reported the lowest HRQL.
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 08/2009; 35(4):371-377. DOI:10.1007/s00068-009-8217-y · 0.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The population's health faces an array of diseases and injuries. Limited resources compel policy-makers everywhere to focus on threats that are regarded most relevant in terms of public health. The World Health Organization and Worldbank developed an innovative concept which expresses the burden of disease in Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY). The DALY provides knowledge on the size of health problems and the potential benefit of proposed measures set against similar and comparable data of other problems. However, apart from the obvious advantages, the DALY-concept has been criticized concerning key aspects of the methodology. This thesis addressed four of these controversial aspects: namely (1) deriving disability weights for disorders with complex and heterogeneous recovery patterns, (2) the disregard of comorbid diseases, (3) the arbitrariness of the in- and exclusion of long-term sequelae, and (4) the absence of a criterion to identify cases that are relevant from a public health perspective. These controversial aspects were addressed with regards to two health (care) domains where these aspects are particularly problematic. Both health domains, injuries and infectious intestinal disease, are featured by heterogeneous health outcomes, including the extremes of the severity spectrum and duration, with all types of time-severity relations. This thesis demonstrated satisfactory alternative solutions to these four controversial issues of the DALY concept. As a result, the DALY-concept may be used for burden of disease studies of conditions in which these controversial issues emerge in particular. Application of alternative solutions proposed in this thesis may improve burden of disease estimates considerably.