The effect of specialist care within the first year on subsequent outcomes in 24,232 adults with new-onset diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study. Qual Saf Health Care

Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 03/2007; 16(1):6-11. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018648
Source: PubMed


Although specialty care has been shown to improve short-term outcomes in patients hospitalised with acute medical conditions, its effect on patients with chronic conditions treated in the ambulatory care setting is less clear.
To examine whether specialty care (ie, consultative care provided by an endocrinologist or a general internist in concert with a patient's primary care doctor) within the first year of diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes after the first year for adults with diabetes mellitus treated as outpatients.
Population-based cohort study using linked administrative data.
The province of Saskatchewan, Canada. Sample: 24 232 adults newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus between 1991 and 2001. Method: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analyses used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates, propensity scores and case mix variables (demographic, disease severity and comorbidities). In addition, restriction analyses examined the effect of specialist care in low-risk subgroups.
The median age of patients was 61 years, and over a mean follow-up of 4.9 years 2932 (12%) died. Patients receiving specialty care were younger, had a greater burden of comorbidities, and visited doctors more often before and after their diabetes diagnosis (all p< or =0.001). Compared with patients seen by primary care doctors alone, patients seen by specialists and primary care doctors were more likely to receive recommended treatments (all p< or =0.001), but were more likely to die (13.1% v 11.7%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.27). This association persisted even in patients without comorbidities or target organ damage (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.34).
Specialty care was associated with better disease-specific process measures but not improved survival in adults with diabetes cared for in ambulatory care settings.

Download full-text


Available from: Dean Eurich,
  • Source
    • "Diabetes Care 2005 [30] OBS 2502 Clinical inertia Shared care linked to reduced clinical inertia Mc Allister et al. Qual Saf Health Care 2007 [29] OBS 24,232 Adherence to guidelines Shared care linked to increased adherence to guidelines Gnavi et al. Diabetes Care 2009 [24] OBS 33,453 Adherence to guidelines Shared care linked to increased adherence to guidelines Rossi et al. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Organizational factors in diabetes care can influence long- and medium-term outcomes, affecting the prognosis to the same extent as new therapies. A growing body of evidence supports the hypothesis that diabetes team consultation can favorably impact on hospital utilization, the costliest item in diabetes management, as well as on hospitalization rates, inpatient hospital length of stay, and re-admission rates. Moreover, the model of diabetes care has been reported to influence guidelines adherence, an additional factor linked to the variability in the quality of diabetes care. The strongest predictor and effect modifier of the quality of diabetes care is specialist referral. Compared to patients seen in primary care or other settings, those visiting a diabetes center are more likely to be monitored according to guidelines, regardless of the severity-of-disease effect, and to receive structured education, as well as more aggressive treatment when needed. Finally, at least eight published studies suggest that when continuity of care is shared with diabetes clinics, all-cause mortality and major cardiovascular events are both reduced. The sharing of care pathways between primary care providers and diabetes teams is likely to be the best and most affordable solution in the complex management of this chronic condition.
    Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases: NMCD 08/2012; 23(1). DOI:10.1016/j.numecd.2012.07.001 · 3.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Consistently with other studies, diabetes clinic referral [8], [11], [17], [18] emerges as a good predictor of better long-term prognosis, being itself associated with a reduction of the probability of death by more than 33%. Compared with those who are only cared for by other physicians, patients seen at a diabetes center are more likely to be monitored according to guidelines, regardless of severity-of-disease effect [10], and to receive structured education as well as more aggressive treatment when needed [19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite the heightened awareness of diabetes as a major health problem, evidence on the impact of assistance and organizational factors, as well as of adherence to recommended care guidelines, on morbidity and mortality in diabetes is scanty. We identified diabetic residents in Torino, Italy, as of 1st January 2002, using multiple independent data sources. We collected data on several laboratory tests and specialist medical examinations to compare primary versus specialty care management of diabetes and the fulfillment of a quality-of-care indicator based on existing screening guidelines (GCI). Then, we performed regression analyses to identify associations of these factors with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity over a 4 year-follow-up. Patients with the lowest degree of quality of care (i.e. only cared for by primary care and with no fulfillment of GCI) had worse RRs for all-cause (1.72 [95% CI 1.57-1.89]), cardiovascular (1.74 [95% CI 1.50-2.01]) and cancer (1.35 [95% CI 1.14-1.61]) mortality, compared with those with the highest quality of care. They also showed increased RRs for incidence of major cardiovascular events up to 2.03 (95% CI 1.26-3.28) for lower extremity amputations. Receiving specialist care itself increased survival, but was far more effective when combined with the fulfillment of GCI. Throughout the whole set of analysis, implementation of guidelines emerged as a strong modifier of prognosis. We conclude that management of diabetic patients with a pathway based on both primary and specialist care is associated with a favorable impact on all-cause mortality and CV incidence, provided that guidelines are implemented.
    PLoS ONE 04/2012; 7(4):e33839. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0033839 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source

Show more