DNA single-strand break repair is impaired in aprataxin-related ataxia

Department of Neurology, Radioisotope Research Center, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Annals of Neurology (Impact Factor: 11.91). 02/2007; 61(2):162-74. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21078
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Early-onset ataxia with ocular motor apraxia and hypoalbuminemia (EAOH)/ataxia with oculomotor apraxia type 1 (AOA1) is an autosomal recessive form of cerebellar ataxia. The causative protein for EAOH/AOA1, aprataxin (APTX), interacts with X-ray repair cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1), a scaffold DNA repair protein for single-strand breaks (SSBs). The goal of this study was to prove the functional involvement of APTX in SSB repair (SSBR).
We visualized the SSBR process with a recently developed laser irradiation system that allows real-time observation of SSBR proteins and with a local ultraviolet-irradiation system using a XPA-UVDE cell line that repairs DNA lesions exclusively via SSBR. APTX was knocked down using small interference RNA in the cells. Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage and cell death were assessed in EAOH fibroblasts and cerebellum.
Our systems showed the XRCC1-dependent recruitment of APTX to SSBs. SSBR was impaired in APTX-knocked-down cells. Oxidative stress in EAOH fibroblasts readily induced SSBs and cell death, which were blocked by antioxidants. Accumulated oxidative DNA damage was confirmed in EAOH cerebellum.
This study provides the first direct evidence for the functional involvement of APTX in SSBR and in vivo DNA damage in EAOH/AOA1, and suggests a benefit of antioxidant treatment.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since identification of mutations in the ATM gene leading to ataxia-telangiectasia, enormous efforts have been devoted to discovering the roles this protein plays in DNA repair as well as other cellular functions. Even before the identification of ATM mutations, it was clear that other diseases with different genomic loci had very similar neurological symptoms. There has been significant progress in understanding why cancer and immunodeficiency occur in ataxia-telangiectasia even though many details remain to be determined, but the field is no closer to determining why the nervous system requires ATM and other DNA repair genes. Even though rodent disease models have similar DNA repair abnormalities as the human diseases, they have no consistent, robust neuropathological phenotype making it difficult to understand the neurological underpinnings of disease. Therefore, it may be useful to reassess the neurological and neuropathological characteristics of ataxia-telangiectasia in human patients to look for potential commonalities in DNA repair diseases that result in ataxia. In doing so, it is clear that ataxia-telangiectasia and similar diseases share neurological features other than merely ataxia, such as length-dependent motor and sensory neuropathies, and that the neuroanatomical localization for these symptoms is understood. Cells affected in ataxia-telangiectasia and similar diseases are some of the largest single nucleated cells in the body. In addition, a subset of these diseases also has extrapyramidal movements and oculomotor apraxia. These neurological and neuropathological similarities may indicate a common DNA repair related pathogenesis with very large cell size as a critical risk factor.
    Neurogenetics 07/2014; 15(4). DOI:10.1007/s10048-014-0415-z · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This document provides a detailed description of the position of the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology on the accuracy and utility of elastography in the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis. The document was written by a group of experts in chronic liver diseases and liver transplantation and reflects the consensus reached on the methodology and indications of transient elastography. This document was reviewed and presented in an abbreviated form at the XX Congress of the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology and included on the website
    Gastroenterology 08/2011; 34(7):504-510. DOI:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2011.05.008 · 13.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Experimental Cell Research 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.027 · 3.37 Impact Factor