Impact of maternal substance use during pregnancy on childhood outcome.

Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. <>
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.13). 05/2007; 12(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.01.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The impact of maternal substance abuse is reflected in the 2002-2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Among pregnant women in the 15-44 age group, 4.3%, 18% and 9.8% used illicit drugs, tobacco and alcohol, respectively. Maternal pregnancy complications following substance use include increases in sexually transmitted disorders, placental abruption and HIV-positive status. Effects on the neonate include a decrease in growth parameters and increases in central nervous system and autonomic nervous system signs and in referrals to child protective agencies. In childhood, behavioral and cognitive effects are seen after prenatal cocaine exposure; tobacco and alcohol have separate and specific effects. The ongoing use of alcohol and tobacco by the caretaker affects childhood behavior. Therefore, efforts should be made to prevent and treat behavioral problems as well as to limit the onset of drug use by adolescent children born to women who use drugs during pregnancy.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent amendments to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act tie the receipt of federal block grants to mandatory reporting of substance-exposed newborns. To determine rates of screening, testing, and reporting of drug and alcohol use at the time of delivery, we administered a telephone survey of nursing managers and perinatal social workers at Maryland birthing hospitals. Of the 34 hospitals, 31 responded (response rate 91%). Although 97% of hospitals reported universal screening, only 6% used a validated instrument. Testing was reported by 94% with 45% reporting universal maternal testing and 7% universal newborn testing. Only 32% reported obtaining maternal consent prior to testing. There is significant heterogeneity in screening and testing for substance use in birthing hospitals. Given federal reporting mandates, state-level practices need to be standardized.
    Social Work in Health Care 08/2014; 53(7):659-669. · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Infant Mental Health Journal 03/2013; 34(2). · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: These authors have contributed equally to this work. Keywords: cognitive development in children of low-socioeconomic families, holistic intervention program, family context, home environment, early intervention program A commentary on Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers by Neville, H. There is considerable evidence that chil-dren from families with low socioeco-nomic status (SES) are at risk of profound delays in cognitive development and edu-cational achievement. Scholars and policy makers have therefore sought to identify the potential causes of these problems and to design interventions to narrow this achievement gap. With this goal, Neville et al. (2013) developed a family-based intervention (PCMC-A) to improve neu-rocognitive functions supporting selec-tive attention in low-SES preschoolers. Involving both parents and children in the training, they demonstrated that the PCMC-A significantly improved nonver-bal IQ, receptive language, neurocogni-tive functions supporting early attentional processing, parent-reported social skills, and parent-child interactions, and reduced parenting stress. Given that previous stud-ies have focused on the training of chil-dren, it is noteworthy that Neville et al. examined factors related to not only chil-dren but also parents (e.g., parents' stress regulation and contingency-based disci-pline) and the home environment (e.g., parent-child interaction, parents' language use with the child, and facilitation of child attention). Although the authors' findings are interesting and their contributions are remarkable, the family-related factors cho-sen for the study are far from satisfactory, as the study did not adequately consider the broader family context, which is cru-cial in capturing the richer dimensions of SES. Our primary goal is therefore to draw attention to the challenges posed by the family-based intervention of Neville et al. In particular, we recommend that future research consider risk factors such as personal resilience, as well as maternal and environmental factors, as they have been shown to affect cognitive develop-ment in children from low-SES families (for a review, see Bradley and Corwyn, 2002; Evans, 2004, 2006). Specifically, resilience—a dynamic pro-cess wherein individuals display positive adaptation despite significant adversity or trauma (Luthar and Cicchetti, 2000)— is a crucial index of individual differ-ences in the fundamental adaptive system. Often overlooked, it has nonetheless been proven to be a positive moderator for many low-SES children who do well despite the odds (Knitzer and Perry, 2009). Early research on resilience—assessed by children's attachment security or social competence (Luthar and Cicchetti, 2000; Masten, 2001)—has largely emphasized the importance of personality traits and active coping strategies that help chil-dren overcome adversity and the risk fac-tors associated with low SES (Bradley and Corwyn, 2002). Thus, future interventions should promote resilience by focusing on self-regulation skills that are essential in facilitating children's adaptive abilities, such as self-control, social competencies,
    Frontiers in Psychology 07/2014; 110:12138-12143. · 2.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014