Esophageal cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 2221 Devine Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association (1975) 09/2006; 102(7):201-9.
Source: PubMed


Because of its high fatality rate and our inability to detect esophageal disease early in its development, esophageal cancer represents a significant medical and public health challenge. The mortality statistics underline the importance of focusing on prevention of these conditions as a matter of state and national public health priority. Unfortunately, the measures needed for primary prevention of these conditions do not seem as clear-cut for populations at highest risk of this disease (i.e., AAs) as for the populations represented in most epidemiologic studies. Our incomplete knowledge about the etiology of esophageal cancer, especially squamous cell carcinomas in AAs and adenocarcinomas in EAs, preclude developing and disseminating effective preventive measures. Clearly, the prevention and control of esophageal cancers represent a different paradigm compared to other tobacco-related cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Data from a number of studies indicate that disparities exist in esophageal cancer incidence between racial groups and between geographical locations within South Carolina, and that these disparities are continuing to increase. The reasons for these disparities are only beginning to receive attention. They probably will be found to be complex and multifaceted. A combination of genetic factors, environmental influences (e.g., those related to diet), and the deleterious changes associated with smoking and alcohol consumption are the obvious parameters that should be the focus of initial epidemiologic data collection and assessment. Issues around dietary assessment, a major area of expertise among researchers in South Carolina, must be addressed in these studies. Much remains to be done for us to understand how research, health care, and educational efforts in the state of South Carolina might influence the detection, care, treatment, and, ultimately, reduction in esophageal cancer incidence and mortality rates. An important step in the process will be to coordinate data-collection efforts between clinicians, researchers, and concerned community members in South Carolina. This would allow comprehensive background profiles of patients to be collected for studies ranging from those focusing on the basic biology of the disease and its etiology to those aimed at understanding the role of health services and the effect of policy. In order to design and implement the full range of research needed to understand what we can do to prevent and control esophageal cancer in our state, it is our intention to engage all of the stakeholders within South Carolina; including community members, cancer survivors, cancer care providers, researchers, and individuals at high risk of esophageal cancer. With its large proportion of rural, socioeconomically deprived African Americans, what is learned about esophageal cancer in South Carolina will have national, and perhaps international, relevance.

7 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine and reconcile differences in incidence rates and stage-at-initial-presentation of prostate and breast cancers in India, a country in epidemiologic transition. Age-adjusted prostate and female breast cancer incidence rates and proportion of cases by stage-at-diagnosis were compared. Data were derived from the National Cancer Registry Program of India, other Indian registries, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the US/ NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Average annual cancer incidence rates in India ranged from 5.0 to 9.1 per 100,000/year for prostate and 7.2 to 31.3 per 100,000/year for female breast. Comparative rates in the US for prostate cancer are 110.4 for Whites and 180.9 for Blacks; for female breast, the rates are 86.6 for Blacks and 96.4 for Whites. Notable differences were observed between rural and urban areas in India, while such differences by rurality appear to be much smaller in the US. Overall, about 50-55% of breast cancer cases and about 85% of prostate cancers were detected at late (III and IV) stage; in contrast to the US where 15% of either cancer is diagnosed at late stage. Differences in stage-at-diagnosis help explain variations in incidence rates among cancer registries in India and rate differences between India and the US. These findings indicate that erroneous inferences will result from incidence-rate comparisons that do not take into account stage-at-diagnosis. Results also point to epidemiologic studies that could be conducted to deepen understanding of the etiology of these cancers. By enhancing data on staging, the Indian cancer registries could widen the scope of collaborative, cross-national research.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 01/2006; 7(4):547-55. · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • Source

    Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association (1975) 09/2006; 102(7):210-1.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preventing cancer, downstaging disease at diagnosis, and reducing mortality require that relevant research findings be translated across scientific disciplines and into clinical and public health practice. Interdisciplinary research focuses on using the languages of different scientific disciplines to share techniques and philosophical perspectives to enhance discovery and development of innovations; (i.e., from the "left end" of the research continuum). Community-based participatory research (CBPR), whose relevance often is relegated to the "right end" (i.e., delivery and dissemination) of the research continuum, represents an important means for understanding how many cancers are caused as well as for ensuring that basic science research findings affect cancer outcomes in materially important ways. Effective interdisciplinary research and CBPR both require an ability to communicate effectively across groups that often start out neither understanding each other's worldviews nor even speaking the same language. Both demand an ability and willingness to treat individuals from other communities with respect and understanding. We describe the similarities between CBPR and both translational and interdisciplinary research, and then illustrate our points using squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus as an example of how to deepen understanding and increase relevance by applying techniques of CBPR and interdisciplinary engagement.
    Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 05/2009; 18(4):1213-7. DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1166 · 4.13 Impact Factor
Show more