Article

Prospective trial of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

Genitourinary Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.42). 03/2007; 69(2):255-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.029
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Non-transitional cell carcinomas account for 5% to 10% of urothelial tract tumors and are each characterized by unique demographics, risk factors, and patterns of spread. A unifying feature of these malignancies is their aggressive course and poor outcome with standard chemotherapeutic regimens. Given the rarity of these tumors, no prospective data are available to guide management.
Patients with unresectable/metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell, small cell, sarcomatoid, or poorly differentiated carcinoma of the urothelial tract were eligible for enrollment. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3 plus mesna. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered with each cycle. The treatment was started again every 3 to 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles.
A total of 20 patients were enrolled. They had the following histologic types: adenocarcinoma in 11, squamous cell carcinoma in 8, and small cell carcinoma in 1. Patients received a median of four cycles (range one to six). The treatment was generally well tolerated, and the toxicity was predominantly hematologic. Overall, 7 (35%) of 20 patients (95% confidence interval 15% to 59%) achieved a major response (3 partial and 4 complete). The median survival for patients with adenocarcinoma was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval 10.2 to 32.3), and for those with squamous cell carcinoma it was 8.9 months (95% confidence interval 5.4 to not yet reached).
The results of our study have shown that this regimen (ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin) is active in patients with advanced non-transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study of a chemotherapeutic regimen in this patient population.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
47 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Carcinoma of the bladder is a common, chemosensitive malignancy. The value of chemotherapy for transitional cell carcinoma (the commonest malignant bladder histology in the developed world) has been demonstrated in both the palliative and the neoadjuvant settings, with survival benefits in both scenarios being achieved with cisplatin-based regimens. Conventional drug treatment is, therefore, dependent on adequate renal function, but renal impairment is a common confounding factor in patients with bladder cancer, due in part to obstruction of the urinary tract and in part to comorbidity in an elderly population. A recent consensus statement deems patients with impaired renal function unsuitable for cisplatin treatment, but the limited available evidence does not support the exclusion of cisplatin in patients with moderate renal impairment. The literature on which to base alternative, non-cisplatin-based chemotherapy is inadequate, but the perception that carboplatin-based combinations are inferior to cisplatin-based combinations is probably incorrect. Trials are needed to specifically examine chemotherapy in patients with bladder cancer and renal impairment.
    Nature Reviews Urology 11/2011; 9(1):52-7. · 4.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare but highly malignant epithelial cancer and commonly found in the urachal remnant which connects the dome of the bladder to the umbilicus via the ligamentum commune. Because of the specificity of the tumor location and its rarity, the diagnosis of UrC is often difficult. Although surgery is the treatment of choice for UrC, it still has a high incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis and there are few modestly standard chemotherapy regimens for these patients (response rate 30-40%). Thus, the treatment of local recurrence and distant metastasis of UrC following surgery has been a challenge. We review the clinical diagnosis and therapy of UrC and factors related to its prognosis.
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 10/2012; · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Urachal carcinomas are rare urologic neoplasms that arise along the urachal remnant from the umbilicus to the dome of the bladder. No published study has examined the diagnostic accuracy of modern preoperative testing to differentiate urachal carcinoma from a benign urachal cyst and spare resection of potentially benign urachal tissue. Our objective was to determine if a urachal mass can be safely diagnosed preoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 104 patients with a urachal mass treated between 1979 and 2011. Exclusion criteria were unresectable metastatic disease at presentation, patients that did not undergo surgery, and management by transurethral resection alone. Of the patients that remained, only 65 had both preoperative diagnostic testing and definitive pathologic results available for analysis. Mean age was 51 years, 86% were Caucasian and 65% were male. Accuracy of diagnosis based on preoperative tests was compared to final pathology (cancer or benign). RESULTS: Fifty-seven tumors (87%) were malignant and the majority of masses (83%) were adenocarcinoma. Compared to computed tomography, cytology, and exploration under anesthesia, transurethral resection of the bladder tumor has the highest sensitivity (0.93), specificity (1), and positive predictive value (1), but a low negative predictive value (0.5). Limitations included small cohort size and few benign urachal masses for comparison. CONCLUSIONS: No test has a high enough negative predictive value to prevent excision of a urachal mass. With few treatment options for localized, advanced, and metastatic urachal cancer, these data suggest that early excision remains the best treatment for a suspicious urachal mass.
    The Journal of urology 10/2012; · 4.02 Impact Factor