Residual symptoms and recurrence during maintenance treatment of late-life depression.

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, United States.
Journal of Affective Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.71). 12/2007; 103(1-3):77-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.020
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many older patients who recover from an episode of major depression continue to suffer from depressed mood, anxiety, and sleep problems. Our study assesses the impact of these residual symptoms on the risk of recurrence during maintenance treatment of late-life depression.
We analyzed data from a randomized clinical trial of maintenance treatment in patients with unipolar depression aged > or =70, 116 of whom remitted and remained stable during open pharmacotherapy and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and were randomized to clinical management/pharmacotherapy; clinical management/placebo; monthly maintenance IPT/ pharmacotherapy; or monthly maintenance IPT/placebo. We assessed the impact of overall residual symptoms (based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) total score) and of specific residual symptom clusters - mood symptoms (depressed mood, guilt, suicidality, energy/interests), sleep disturbance (early, middle, late insomnia), and anxiety (agitation, psychic and somatic anxiety, hypochondriasis) measured at randomization. Sleep disturbance was also assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We used Cox proportional hazards regression models controlling for assignment to antidepressant medication versus placebo to identify predictors of recurrence.
Residual anxiety and residual sleep disturbance (as measured by the PSQI but not the HAM-D) independently predicted early recurrence.
Use of HAM-D clusters to define residual symptoms; analysis limited to completers of acute and continuation treatment.
In patients with late-life depression who have remitted with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, the deleterious effect of residual symptoms is due to persisting anxiety and, possibly, residual sleep disturbance.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objectives. To evaluate quetiapine XR in patients with anxious depression, as defined by HAM-A total and HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor scores. Methods. Post hoc analyses of pooled data from two 6-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of adjunctive quetiapine XR (150 or 300 mg/day) in patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressants. Patients were stratified in a primary analysis using HAM-A (HAM-A total score at baseline ≥ 20 ["high"] or < 20 ["low"]) and a secondary analysis using HAM-D (anxious depression defined as HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score ≥ 7). Outcomes included change in MADRS total score. Results. In patients with high anxiety levels (HAM-A total score ≥ 20), reductions in MADRS total score were -15.20 (P = 0.122) and -15.92 (P < 0.05) for quetiapine XR 150 and 300 mg/day, respectively, vs. placebo (-13.49). In patients with low levels of anxiety (HAM-A total score < 20), both quetiapine XR doses (P < 0.001) improved MADRS total scores vs. placebo. In the secondary analysis, quetiapine XR 150 (P < 0.01) and 300 mg/day (P < 0.001) improved MADRS total score vs. placebo in patients with HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score ≥ 7. Conclusions. Adjunct quetiapine XR demonstrates efficacy in patients with anxious and non-anxious depression, assessed using HAM-A total score, and anxious depression assessed using HAM-D anxiety/somatisation factor score.
    The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 02/2014; 15(2):155-66. DOI:10.3109/15622975.2013.842654 · 3.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of treatment of depression is remission of symptoms and functioning. Although there is a relationship between remission of symptoms and remission of functioning, it is not known how individual residual symptoms are related to functioning. Here we report a post-hoc analysis of two studies which treated depressed patients with duloxetine in an open fashion for 10-12 weeks. We evaluated the association of individual residual symptoms and functional impairment in patients who remitted or partially remitted after acute treatment. Logistic regression was used to investigate residual symptoms associated with functional impairment at endpoint. Our results suggest that in partial remitters, the only residual symptom associated with a reduction in the risk of having impaired function was the resolution of painful physical symptoms (PPS). In patients who remitted, the presence of residual core mood symptoms (CMS), particularly in patients without any anxiety, predicted impaired functioning. The resolution of PPS in the presence of residual CMS was associated with less risk of impaired functioning. Our results contribute to understand better the role of specific residual symptoms on functional impairment. To achieve normal functioning, intervention on specific residual symptoms is recommended.
    Psychiatry Research 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.042 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depression (MD) is a highly heterogeneous diagnostic category. Diverse symptoms such as sad mood, anhedonia, and fatigue are routinely added to an unweighted sum-score, and cutoffs are used to distinguish between depressed participants and healthy controls. Researchers then investigate outcome variables like MD risk factors, biomarkers, and treatment response in such samples. These practices presuppose that (1) depression is a discrete condition, and that (2) symptoms are interchangeable indicators of this latent disorder. Here I review these two assumptions, elucidate their historical roots, show how deeply engrained they are in psychological and psychiatric research, and document that they contrast with evidence. Depression is not a consistent syndrome with clearly demarcated boundaries, and depression symptoms are not interchangeable indicators of an underlying disorder. Current research practices lump individuals with very different problems into one category, which has contributed to the remarkably slow progress in key research domains such as the development of efficacious antidepressants or the identification of biomarkers for depression. The recently proposed network framework offers an alternative to the problematic assumptions. MD is not understood as a distinct condition, but as heterogeneous symptom cluster that substantially overlaps with other syndromes such as anxiety disorders. MD is not framed as an underlying disease with a number of equivalent indicators, but as a network of symptoms that have direct causal influence on each other: insomnia can cause fatigue which then triggers concentration and psychomotor problems. This approach offers new opportunities for constructing an empirically based classification system and has broad implications for future research.
    Frontiers in Psychology 03/2015; 6(306):1-11. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00309 · 2.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 23, 2014