Article

The Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire: An assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis

Centre for Eye Research Australia, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Investigative Ophthalmology &amp Visual Science (Impact Factor: 3.66). 03/2007; 48(3):1001-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0361
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess and validate the subscale structure of the 28-item Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) Scale by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis for use as an outcome measure.
Three hundred nineteen participants completed the IVI questionnaire, and the responses then were subjected to Rasch analysis by RUMM2020 software. With the person estimates for each item, CFA was used to assess two hypothesized structures: three-and four-factor models. The subscales of the model with the best fit were then further validated by Rasch analysis.
CFA supported a three-factor model that included items from the emotional well-being, reading and accessing information, and mobility and independence subscales. Almost all the selected goodness-of-fit statistics for the three-factor model were better than the recommended values. The factor loadings of the items on their respective domains were all statistically significant (P < 0.001) and ranged between 0.54 and 0.81. The three subscales individually fitted the Rasch model according to the item-trait interaction test (mobility and independence chi(2) [df] = 45.9 [44], P = 0.39; emotional well-being = 28.4 [32], P = 0.65; and reading and accessing information = 43.5 [36], P = 0.18). The item-fit residuals values of the three subscales were <2.5 and showed mean and standard deviations approximating 0 and 1, respectively. The internal consistency reliability of the subscales (alpha) was substantial, ranging between 0.89 and 0.91.
An examination of the IVI dimension confirmed a three-subscale structure that displays interval measurement characteristics likely to provide a valid and reliable assessment of restriction of participation. The findings provide an opportunity for a more detailed measurement of the effects of different types of low-vision rehabilitation programs.

1 Follower
 · 
156 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To design and evaluate an instrument appropriate for assessing vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in persons with severe vision loss. Methods: 603 legally blind persons (better eye visual acuity of <20/200) were interviewed using an item pool based on the original Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire, augmented by items appropriate for persons with severe vision loss. Refinement and item reduction was done in three steps using factor and Rasch analysis to assess psychometric properties, exploring key indices such as response category functioning (floor and ceiling effects), instrument unidimensionality, discriminant ability and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability. Results: A final pool of 28 items was selected which grouped into two subscales of the IVI-VLV - activities of daily living, mobility & safety (ADLMS; 16 items) and emotional well-being (EWB; 12 items). Both subscales are unidimensional, able to differentiate reliably between at least three different levels of VRQoL, and item difficulty was adequate for the assessed sample. Using generalized linear models and controlling for age, we found that poor general health (p=0.005 and p=0.007) and concurrent depression and anxiety (p=0.019 and p<0.001) were associated with a lower ADLMS and EWB subscale score, respectively. Conclusions: The IVI-VLV is a valid and reliable VRQoL measure in persons with severe vision loss, and its measurement is almost unaffected by participants' self-perceived general or mental health. The IVI-VLV can be used as an outcome measure in trials attempting sight restoration.
    Investigative Ophthalmology &amp Visual Science 09/2014; 55(10). DOI:10.1167/iovs.14-14731 · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effectiveness of a low vision self-management program (LVSMP) in older adults.Methods Participants(n = 153) were existing clients of a national low vision rehabilitation organisation randomly allocated to usual services (n = 60) or usual services plus LVSMP (n = 93). The LVSMP was an eight-week group program facilitated by low vision counsellors. The primary outcome was vision-specific quality of life (QoL) measured using the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes emotional well-being, self-efficacy and adaptation to vision loss were measured using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and Short Form Adaptation to Age-Related Vision Loss scale (AVL12).ResultsAt one and six month follow-up assessments, no significant between-group differences were found for vision-specific QoL, emotional well-being, adaptation to vision loss or self-efficacy (p > 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no impact of the intervention on outcome measures.Conclusions In contrast to previous work, our study found limited benefit of a LVSM program on QoL for older adults accessing low vision services.Practice ImplicationsWhen implementing self-management programs in low vision rehabilitation settings, issues of client interest, divergence of need, program accessibility and fidelity of intervention delivery need to be addressed.
    Patient Education and Counseling 11/2014; 98(2). DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.008 · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objet Élucidation des symptômes du glaucome que les patients signalent volontairement et détermination de la corrélation entre les symptômes et l’étape du glaucome. Nature Séries rétrospectives de cas. Participants 401 patients qui s’étaient présentés au Service du glaucome de janvier 2012 à novembre 2013. Méthodes Le Centre Wills Eye de recherche oculaire en glaucome a revu rétrospectivement les dossiers médicaux de patients qui avaient visité le Service du Glaucome entre janvier 2012 et novembre 2013. Nous avons relevé tout symptôme inscrit dans les dossiers dans la dernière visite éligible de chaque patient. Les sujets furent classifiés selon diverses étapes selon la moyenne de déviation du champ visuel Octopus. Résultats Nous avons analysé 401 patients, dont la perte visuelle a été classée légère (N=170), modérée (N=106) ou grave (N=125). La majorité des patients n’avait pas signalé de symptôme (56,0 %), 24,2 % avaient signalé des symptômes de maladie de la surface oculaire (MSO) et 25,8 % avaient exprimé des plaintes visuelles. La présence de symptômes était en corrélation avec la gravité du glaucome (p = 0,01) et le nombre de chirurgies (p = 0,02). Les brûlements/picotements/piquements et la vision trouble montraient une corrélation positive avec la gravité du glaucome (p < 0,05). Les patients plus âgés (>69 ans) présentèrent une hausse significative des symptômes de MSO (p = 0,001). Conclusion Environ le quart des patients atteints du glaucome a signalé des plaintes visuelles et un autre quart a fait état de symptômes de MSO, les deux groupes étant reliés à la gravité du glaucome. La forte prévalence des symptômes de MSO suggère que les patients devraient être interrogés particulièrement sur ces symptômes et traités tel qu’indiqué. Cette information est particulièrement valable dans la nouvelle ère de médication du glaucome sans agent de conservation.
    Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 10/2014; 49(5):420–425. DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.07.014 · 1.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
18 Downloads
Available from
Jul 3, 2014