Using deconvolution to improve PET spatial resolution in OSEM iterative reconstruction.

Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology (IBFM)-CNR, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Methods of Information in Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.08). 02/2007; 46(2):231-5.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A novel approach to the PET image reconstruction is presented, based on the inclusion of image deconvolution during conventional OSEM reconstruction. Deconvolution is here used to provide a recovered PET image to be included as "a priori" information to guide OSEM toward an improved solution.
Deconvolution was implemented using the Lucy-Richardson (LR) algorithm: Two different deconvolution schemes were tested, modifying the conventional OSEM iterative formulation: 1) We built a regularizing penalty function on the recovered PET image obtained by deconvolution and included it in the OSEM iteration. 2) After each conventional global OSEM iteration, we deconvolved the resulting PET image and used this "recovered" version as the initialization image for the next OSEM iteration. Tests were performed on both simulated and acquired data.
Compared to the conventional OSEM, both these strategies, applied to simulated and acquired data, showed an improvement in image spatial resolution with better behavior in the second case. In this way, small lesions, present on data, could be better discriminated in terms of contrast.
Application of this approach to both simulated and acquired data suggests its efficacy in obtaining PET images of enhanced quality.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The aim of this work was to introduce a new algorithm for image reconstruction in bone SPECT and to compare its performances with a commercially available standard OSEM and resolution recovery (RR) reconstruction. Materials and methods The algorithm was built applying the Lucy-Richardson deconvolution adn logarithmic image processing to the projections. A modification of the coefficients of wavelet decomposition was used to suppress the noise. The comparison with vendor software was performed both in a phantom study, using Signal-to-Noise ratio (SNR), Signal-to-Background ratio (SBR), spatial resolution and in clinical studies, by visual assessment of changes in contrast, spatial resolution and lesion detectability. Results A change in the SNR (from −4 to 40%), an increase in the SBR (from 19 to 40%), a minor improvement in spatial resolution and a similar noise level were observed in the phantom study in comparison to the standard OSEM. A decrease in the SNR, a worse spatial resolution, but only a 3 to 13 % lower SBR were achieved in comparison with the vendor supplied RR algorithm. The proposed algorithm creates patient images with better contrast and lesion detectability compared to clinically used OSEM. Compared to RR, more than half of obtained images showed better contrast and nearly half of them have better lesion detectability. Conclusion The proposed algorithm compares favorably with the standard OSEM. Although less favorable, the comparison with RR and noise suppression algorithms, suggests that it can be used with only a slight decrease in the SBR.
    Physica Medica 01/2014; · 1.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. Clinically, it is characterized by progressive cognitive and functional impairment with structural hallmarks of cortical atrophy and ventricular expansion. Amyloid plaque aggregation is also known to occur in AD subjects. In-vivo imaging of amyloid plaques is now possible with positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands. PET imaging suffers from a degrading phenomenon known as the partial volume effect (PVE). The quantitative accuracy of PET images is reduced by PVEs primarily due to the limited spatial resolution of the scanner. The degree of PVE is influenced by structure size, with smaller structures tending to suffer from more severe PVEs such as atrophied grey matter regions. The aims of this paper were to investigate the effect of partial volume correction (PVC) on the quantification of amyloid PET and to highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate PVC technique. An improved PVC technique, region-based voxel-wise (RBV) correction, was compared against existing Van-Cittert (VC) and Müller-Gärtner (MG) methods using amyloid PET imaging data. Digital phantom data were produced using segmented MRI scans from a control subject and an AD subject. Typical tracer distributions were generated for each of the phantom anatomies. Also examined were 70 clinical PET scans acquired using [(18)F]flutemetamol. Volume of interest (VOI) analysis was performed for corrected and uncorrected images. PVC was shown to improve the quantitative accuracy of regional analysis performed on amyloid PET images. Of the corrections applied, VC deconvolution demonstrated the worst recovery of grey matter values. MG PVC was shown to induce biases in some grey matter regions due to grey matter variability. In addition, white matter variability was shown to influence the accuracy of MG PVC in cortical grey matter and also cerebellar grey matter, a typical reference region for amyloid PET normalization in sporadic AD. RBV was shown to be more accurate than MG in terms of grey matter and white matter uptake. An increase in within-group variability after PVC was observed and is believed to be a genuine, more accurate representation of the data rather than a correction-induced error. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) threshold for classifying subjects as either amyloid-positive or amyloid-negative was found to be 1.64 in the uncorrected dataset, rising to 2.25 after PVC. Care should be taken when applying PVC to amyloid PET images. Assumptions made in existing PVC strategies can induce biases that could lead to erroneous inferences about uptake in certain regions. The proposed RBV PVC technique accounts for within-compartment variability, with the potential to reduce errors of this kind.
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 02/2011; 38(6):1104-19. · 4.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: As is well known, limited spatial resolution leads to partial volume effects (PVE) and consequently to limited signal recovery. Determination of the mean activity concentration of a target structure is thus compromised even at target sizes much larger than the reconstructed spatial resolution. This leads to serious size-dependent underestimates of true signal intensity in hot spot imaging. For quantitative PET in general and in the context of therapy assessment in particular it is, therefore, mandatory to perform an adequate partial volume correction (PVC). The goal of our work was to develop and to validate a model-free PVC algorithm for hot spot imaging. METHODS: The algorithm proceeds in two automated steps. Step 1: estimation of the actual object boundary with a threshold based method and determination of the total activity A measured within the enclosed volume V. Step 2: determination of the activity fraction B, which is measured outside the object due to the partial volume effect (spill-out). The PVE corrected mean value is then given by Cmean = (A+B)/V. For validation simulated tumours were used which were derived from real patient data (liver metastases of a colorectal carcinoma and head and neck cancer, respectively). The simulated tumours have characteristics (regarding tumour shape, contrast, noise, etc.) which are very similar to those of the underlying patient data, but the boundaries and tracer accumulation are exactly known. The PVE corrected mean values of 37 simulated tumours were determined and compared with the true mean values. RESULTS: For the investigated simulated data the proposed approach yields PVE corrected mean values which agree very well with the true values (mean deviation (+/- s.d.): (0.8 +/- 2.5)% CONCLUSIONS: The described method enables accurate quantitative partial volume correction in oncological hot spot imaging.
    EJNMMI research. 04/2012; 2(1):16.


Available from
Jul 2, 2014