Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes: 2007 update a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism - Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, USA.Circulation (Impact Factor: 14.95). 04/2007; 115(12):1643-455. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.181423
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the current preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) administrative policies and cardiovascular screening content of all 50 states and Washington, DC. PPE policies, documents, and forms from all 50 states and Washington, DC, were compared with the preparticipation physical evaluation-fourth edition (PPE-4) consensus recommendations. All electronic documents were publicly available and obtained from state interscholastic athletic associations. Fifty (98%) states required a PPE before participation. Most states (53%, n = 27) required a specific PPE form, whereas 24% (n = 12) of states recommended a specific form. Twenty-three states (45%) required or recommended use of the PPE-4 form or a modified version of it, and 27 states (53%) required or recommended use of outdated or unidentifiable forms. Ten states (20%) had not revised their PPE forms in >5 years. States permitted 9 different health care providers to administer PPEs. Only 22 states (43%) addressed all 12 of the PPE-4 personal and family history cardiovascular screening items, and 2 states (4%) addressed between 8 and 11 items. For the remaining 26 states, most (29%) addressed ≤3 screening items. Our results show that inconsistencies in PPE policies exist nationwide. Most states have been slow to adopt PPE-4 recommendations and do not adequately address the personal and family cardiovascular history questions. Findings suggest a need for PPE standardization nationwide and adoption of an electronic PPE process. This approach would enable creation of a national database and benefit the public by facilitating a more evidenced PPE. Copyright © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.Pediatrics 12/2014; 135(1). DOI:10.1542/peds.2014-1451 · 5.30 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Soccer is the most popular sport in the world, with over 200 million active players. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) represents the most striking as well as the most common cause of death in the soccer field. Underlying cardiovascular pathologies predispose to life threatening ventricular arrhythmias and SCD in soccer players. Up to thousands to hundred thousands players might have an underlying condition that predisposes them for SCD. After several media striking SCD events in soccer players the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) has made screening recommendations that are more thorough than the ones recommended for the American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology. We present a retrospective search through Internet databases that resulted in 54 soccer players with SCD events from 2000 until 2013. In this article, we will describe and discuss the conditions of those cases of SCD in order to provide more knowledge of the factors that may precipitate SCD in young soccer players.The Physician and sportsmedicine 11/2014; 42(4):20-9. DOI:10.3810/psm.2014.11.2088 · 1.49 Impact Factor
British Journal of Sports Medicine 10/2012; 46(Suppl_1):i4-i6. DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091621 · 4.17 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.