Detection of traumatic axonal injury with diffusion tensor imaging in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Experimental Neurology (Impact Factor: 4.65). 06/2007; 205(1):116-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.01.035
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is thought to be a major contributor to cognitive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury (TBI), however TAI is difficult to diagnose or characterize non-invasively. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown promise in detecting TAI, but direct comparison to histologically-confirmed axonal injury has not been performed. In the current study, mice were imaged with DTI, subjected to a moderate cortical controlled impact injury, and re-imaged 4-6 h and 24 h post-injury. Axonal injury was detected by amyloid beta precursor protein (APP) and neurofilament immunohistochemistry in pericontusional white matter tracts. The severity of axonal injury was quantified using stereological methods from APP stained histological sections. Two DTI parameters--axial diffusivity and relative anisotropy--were significantly reduced in the injured, pericontusional corpus callosum and external capsule, while no significant changes were seen with conventional MRI in these regions. The contusion was easily detectable on all MRI sequences. Significant correlations were found between changes in relative anisotropy and the density of APP stained axons across mice and across subregions spanning the spatial gradient of injury. The predictive value of DTI was tested using a region with DTI changes (hippocampal commissure) and a region without DTI changes (anterior commissure). Consistent with DTI predictions, there was histological detection of axonal injury in the hippocampal commissure and none in the anterior commissure. These results demonstrate that DTI is able to detect axonal injury, and support the hypothesis that DTI may be more sensitive than conventional imaging methods for this purpose.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigated how the occurrence and severity of the main neuropathological types of traumatic brain injury (TBI) influenced the severity of disability after a head injury. Eighty-five victims, each of whom had lived at least a month after a head injury but then died, were studied. Judged by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), before death 35 were vegetative, 30 were severely and 20 were moderately disabled. Neuropathological assessment showed that 71 (84%) victims had sustained cerebral contusions, 49 (58%) had diffuse axonal injury (DAI), 57 (67%), had ischemic brain damage (IBD), 58 (68%) had symmetrical ventricular enlargement, and in 47 (55%) intracranial pressure (ICP) had been increased. Thirty-five (41%) had undergone evacuation of an intracranial hematoma. Brainstem damage was seen in only 11 (13%). Analysis (χ(2) test for trends) of the relationship between these features and outcome showed that findings of DAI, raised ICP, thalamic damage, or ventricular enlargement (all p<0.005), and IBD (p=0.04) were associated with an increasingly worse outcome. Conversely, moderate or severe contusions (p=0.001) were increasingly associated with better outcomes, and evacuation of a hematoma was associated (p=0.001) with outcomes likely to be better than vegetative. We conclude that diffuse or multifocal neuropathological patterns of TBI from primary axonal injury or secondary ischemic damage are most likely to be associated with the most severely impaired outcomes after a head injury.
    Journal of neurotrauma 03/2011; 28(5):701-9. · 4.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often results in traumatic axonal injury (TAI). This is difficult to identify using conventional neuroimaging methods. We review recent work that uses advanced imaging methods to identify TAI following mild (m)TBI. Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is a highly sensitive way of identifying microbleeds, which are a marker of TAI. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provides a more flexible way of investigating white matter injury. Recent studies largely confirm that DTI is sensitive to white matter damage after mTBI. Distinct DTI abnormalities are observed in the acute and subacute/chronic stages. DTI measurements change dynamically after an injury, reflecting the evolving pathological processes. DTI abnormalities correlate with cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments. Importantly, DTI can contribute to the prediction of clinical outcome and has begun to be applied to the study of sports and blast injury. DTI and SWI are important advances in MRI that allow more detailed investigation of white matter injury. SWI is a highly sensitive way of identifying microbleeds. DTI is a flexible way of quantifying white matter integrity, and provides a method of diagnosing clinically significant white matter injury when conventional imaging is normal.
    Current opinion in neurology 12/2011; 24(6):558-63. · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an emerging technique providing improved contrast between white matter tracts and gray matter in the central nervous system. Recent animal studies of spinal cord injury (SCI) support that DTI-derived parameters are viable biomarkers reflecting white matter tract integrity following SCI. The extent of axonal damage in acute or chronic SCI has been accurately assessed, predicting long-term neurological outcome in animal models. Herein, we introduce the concept and principles of using these DTI parameters as biomarkers to detect white matter injury in SCI. We compare imaging settings for studying experimental SCI, and discuss how recent findings provide a strong basis to evaluate SCI. The correlation of DTI parameters to the underlying neuropathology and functional assessment related to SCI are also reviewed. Finally, the possible pitfalls and limitations of DTI analysis in rodent SCI are discussed.
    Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroengineering. 01/2013; 2:1-16.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014