Article

A prospective observational study of the safety and acceptability of vaginal hysterectomy performed in a 24-hour day case surgery setting.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.86). 05/2007; 114(4):430-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01269.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the safety and acceptability of vaginal hysterectomy with and without simultaneous oophorectomy in a 24-hour day case surgery setting for women with nonprolapse indications for surgery.
Prospective observational study.
A busy teaching hospital and tertiary referral centre for Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Seventy-one women from one consultant's practice underwent a vaginal hysterectomy with a planned discharge within 24 hours after the procedure. All women had a body mass index less than 40 and a suitable home environment for routine day case surgery, other than that the women were from an unselected population.
Prospective observational study.
The duration of the operation and mean blood loss were recorded. Any intraoperative complications were noted. In addition, the proportion of women discharged home within 24 hours of the operation was recorded together with any readmissions to hospital. Returns to theatres and any postoperative complications were also recorded. Postoperative pain scores were assessed 6 and 24 hours after procedure in selected women.
Seventy-one vaginal hysterectomies were performed as 24-hour day case procedures. The intraoperative complication rate was 1.4%. Sixty-five women were discharged home within 24 hours (91.5%). The readmission rate within this group was 6.2%. The duration of the procedure, mean blood loss, return to theatre rate and incidence of febrile illness were comparable with rates recorded in inpatient studies.
Vaginal hysterectomy performed as a 24-hour day case procedure appears to be as safe as traditional inpatient management, with a high rate of early discharge and a low rate of readmission. This may have additional advantages for the woman and healthcare provider alike.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives This article attempts to offer balanced insight into the use of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse especially in the light of the negative publicity in recent times. The role of transvaginal mesh has been in the limelight for a number of reasons and it is important to address this issue in an objective, fair, and balanced manner. The conventional approach to prolapse surgery has undergone a paradigm shift and the principles of mesh replacement surgery sharply contrast with many traditionally held beliefs. This has created a new set of challenges that has revealed a sharp division of opinion among specialists and sub-specialists alike. Conclusion The article is an attempt to explain how mesh surgery can be safely and efficiently performed in carefully selected cases and is based on the combined wisdom of some of the leading surgeons in the sub-specialty today.
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 12/2013; 62(6).
  • Source
    IJRCOG. 12/2012; VOL 1(ISSUE 1):7-11.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/Definition of the Problem: In recent years, postoperative management has changed towards rapid mobilisation, early oral feeding and rapid rehabilitation (known as Fast-Track or Enhanced Recovery Concepts). This study analysed the postoperative length of stay after vaginal hysterectomy in 3 different periods of time. Material and Methods: In the period October 2011 - September 2012, 75 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomies (± adnexectomy); another 114 vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomies with additional operations (e.g. prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery) and malignancies were not included. The time periods August 1995 - July 1996 (n = 50) and October 1996 - September 1997 (n = 96) served as a comparison. Reducing the length of stay was not an explicit goal. Results: The median postoperative stay was shortened from 7 (5-9) to 5 (3-15) or 3 (0-5) days (p < 0.001). The recovery rate remained unchanged at 2.7 % (n = 2), cf. 2 % (n = 1) and 3.1 % (n = 3). In 40/75 cases (53.3 %), the surgery took place on the day of admission. Conclusion: The length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy has more than halved since 1995/1996 and continues to decline. This development occurred without a shortened stay being an explicit goal of the clinic. The shortened length of stay does not appear to have a negative impact on postoperative complications and recovery rate.
    Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 05/2014; 74(5):449-453. · 0.85 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads