Article

A prospective observational study of the safety and acceptability of vaginal hysterectomy performed in a 24-hour day case surgery setting.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.76). 05/2007; 114(4):430-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01269.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the safety and acceptability of vaginal hysterectomy with and without simultaneous oophorectomy in a 24-hour day case surgery setting for women with nonprolapse indications for surgery.
Prospective observational study.
A busy teaching hospital and tertiary referral centre for Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Seventy-one women from one consultant's practice underwent a vaginal hysterectomy with a planned discharge within 24 hours after the procedure. All women had a body mass index less than 40 and a suitable home environment for routine day case surgery, other than that the women were from an unselected population.
Prospective observational study.
The duration of the operation and mean blood loss were recorded. Any intraoperative complications were noted. In addition, the proportion of women discharged home within 24 hours of the operation was recorded together with any readmissions to hospital. Returns to theatres and any postoperative complications were also recorded. Postoperative pain scores were assessed 6 and 24 hours after procedure in selected women.
Seventy-one vaginal hysterectomies were performed as 24-hour day case procedures. The intraoperative complication rate was 1.4%. Sixty-five women were discharged home within 24 hours (91.5%). The readmission rate within this group was 6.2%. The duration of the procedure, mean blood loss, return to theatre rate and incidence of febrile illness were comparable with rates recorded in inpatient studies.
Vaginal hysterectomy performed as a 24-hour day case procedure appears to be as safe as traditional inpatient management, with a high rate of early discharge and a low rate of readmission. This may have additional advantages for the woman and healthcare provider alike.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
60 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the effect of Enhanced Recovery pathway implementation on patient outcomes following vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications. Case control study examining outcome measures eg length of stay, pain scores, post-operative morbidity and readmission rates following implementation of ERAS for vaginal hysterectomy. Classification: The design of the study conforms to Canadian Task Force II ie case-control study. A London teaching hospital PATIENTS: 50 VH cases following implementation of ERAS were compared to 50 controls pre-ERAS matched for indication for surgery, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, age and surgeon. ERAS pathway MEASUREMENTS: Length of stay, % 24 hour discharge, urinary catheter and vaginal pack use, readmission rates. Perioperative expenditures were also compared and cost effectiveness of ERAS assessed. Median age (49.0 vs 51.0 yrs), parity (2.0 vs 2.0) and body mass index (26.5 vs 28.3) were statistically comparable. Following ERAS implementation, the median length of stay was reduced by 51.6% (22.0 vs 45.5 hrs, p<0.01) while the percentage of 24 hour discharges was increased five-fold (78.0 vs 15.6%, p<0.05). Frequency of catheter (82.0 vs 95.6%) and vaginal pack (52.0 vs 82.2%) use were significantly lower in the post-ERAS group and these were removed earlier (14.5 vs 23.7 hrs and 16.0 vs 23.0 hrs respectively, p<0.05 in all cases). Attendance at the Accident and Emergency Department (12.0 vs 0%, p>0.05) and inpatient readmission rate (4.0 vs 0.0 %, p>0.05) were similar in both groups. Despite having to start a gynaecology "school" and employ a specialist Enhanced Recovery nurse, a saving of 9.25% per patient was demonstrated. ERAS programme in benign vaginal hysterectomy reduces the length of stay by 51.6% and allows more women to be discharged within 24 hours with no increase in in patient readmissions rates.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 07/2013; · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programmes were first conceived to optimise perioperative patient care and have been delivered by surgical specialities in the UK for over a decade. Although their safety and acceptability have been ratified in many surgical fields including gynaecology and colorectal surgery, the cost effectiveness of its implementation in benign vaginal surgery remains unclear. In this case-control study, the perioperative expenditure for 45 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy at a North London teaching hospital after implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway was compared with 45 matched controls prior to implementation. Frequency of catheter use (84.4% vs. 95.6%) and median length of stay (23.5 vs. 42.9 h) were significantly lower following implementation of pathway (both p < 0.05). Although enhanced recovery patients were more likely to attend the accident and emergency department for minor symptoms following discharge (15.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.05), the inpatient readmission rate (6.7% vs. 0.0%, p > 0.05) was similar in both groups. Establishing the programme incurred additional expenditures including delivering a patient-orientated gynaecology 'school' and employing a specialist enhanced recovery nurse, but despite these, we demonstrated a saving of 15.2% (or £164.86) per patient. The cost efficiency savings, coupled with increased satisfaction and no rise in morbidity, offers a very attractive means of managing women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. We believe that our data can be reproduced in other centres and recommend that the pathway be used routinely in women undergoing these procedures. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Health Planning and Management 05/2013; · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    IJRCOG. 12/2012; VOL 1(ISSUE 1):7-11.

Full-text

View
0 Downloads