Article

Over-expression of parathyroid hormone Type 1 receptor confers an aggressive phenotype in osteosarcoma.

Department of Pediatrics and Molecular Pharmacology, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, NY, USA.
International Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.01). 09/2007; 121(5):943-54. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22749
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in children and is associated with rapid bone growth. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) signaling via parathyroid hormone Type 1 receptor (PTHR1) is important for skeletal development and is involved in bone metastases in other tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of PTHrP/PTHR1 and its possible role in osteosarcoma. In a preliminary screening, a higher level of PTHR1 mRNA, but not PTHrP, was found in 4 osteosarcoma xenografts as compared with 4 standard cell lines, or 5 patient derived cell lines (p < 0.05) using quantitative RT-PCR. It was therefore extended to 55 patient specimens, in which a significantly higher level of PTHR1 mRNA was detected in metastatic or relapsed samples than those from primary sites (p < 0.01). Cell behavior caused by PTHR1 overexpression was further studied in vitro using PTHR1 transfected HOS cell line as a model. Over-expression of PHTR1 resulted in increased proliferation, motility and Matrigel invasion without addition of exogenous PTHrP suggesting an autocrine effect. Importantly, the aggressiveness in PTHR1-expressing cells was completely reversed by RNAi mediated gene knockdown. In addition, PTHR1 over-expression led to delayed osteoblastic differentiation and upregulation of genes involved in extracellular matrix production, such as TGF-beta1 and connective tissue growth factor. When cocultured with bone marrow derived monocytes, PTHR1 transfected HOS cells induced a greater number of osteoclasts. This study suggests that PTHR1 over-expression may promote osteosarcoma progression by conferring a more aggressive phenotype, and forming a more favorable microenvironment.

0 Followers
 · 
97 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant primary bone tumor in children and adolescents. Current optimal treatment for osteosarcoma consists of multi-agent chemotherapy and aggressive surgical resection of all sites of disease involvement. The current national and international cooperative trial for patients with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma builds upon the backbone of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate. This protocol is designed to clarify whether (i) the addition of ifosfamide and etoposide to postoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate improves the event-free survival and overall survival for patients with resectable osteosarcoma and a poor histologic response to 10 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy; and (ii) the addition of pegylated interferon-α-2b as maintenance therapy after postoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate improves the event-free survival and overall survival for patients with resectable osteosarcoma and a good histologic response to 10 weeks of preoperative chemotherapy. However, the optimal treatment strategy (or strategies) for patients with relapsed or metastatic disease has yet to be defined. This remains one of the persistent challenges in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Recent therapeutic advances have focused on circumventing chemotherapy resistance mechanisms, incorporation of non-classical agents into upfront therapy, targeting of the tumor micro-environment, and investigating the role of novel delivery mechanisms. In patients with localized disease the 5-year survival rate is at least 70%; patients with metastatic or recurrent disease have <20% chance of long-term survival despite aggressive therapies. These figures have changed little in the past 2 decades. This review focuses on the current therapy for osteosarcoma, and highlights emerging strategies that will hopefully change the outlook for patients with this disease.
    Paediatric Drugs 01/2008; 10(5):315-327. DOI:10.2165/00148581-200810050-00005
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional prognostic determinants in osteosarcoma have included demographics (age, sex), tumour size, site, stage, and the response to chemotherapy. Many of these are determined using varying techniques and units of measurement, which can make comparison between studies difficult. The absence of survival difference between limb sparing surgery and amputation has been repeatedly demonstrated in primary disease, and even in the setting of pathological fracture. On the other hand, there is still some controversy over the existence of increased local recurrence for limb-sparing surgery, and the implications of this. Commonly used prognostic determinants such as metastases, and response to chemotherapy enable a high degree of prognostic accuracy but usually at a late stage in the course of disease. Leading on from this, there is a need to uncover molecular pathways with specific influence over osteosarcoma progression to facilitate earlier treatment changes. Some important pathways are already being defined, for example the association of CXCR4 with metastases on presentation, the likelihood of doxorubicin resistance with positive P-glycoprotein, and the reduced survival prediction of over expressed survivin. It is anticipated that the future of osteosarcoma treatment will involve treatment tailored to the molecular profile of tumours at diagnosis, adjuvant therapy directed towards dysfunctional molecular pathways rather than the use of cytotoxics, and a more standardised approach to the measurement of clinical prognostic factors.
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 04/2008; 134(3):281-97. DOI:10.1007/s00432-007-0330-x
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An understanding of differential gene expression in highly metastatic osteosarcoma could provide gene targets for treatment of metastases. We compared gene expression profiles of high- (LM7) and low- (LM2) metastatic SaOS2-derived cell lines in an in vitro tissue culture model and examined several differentially regulated genes in vivo in a murine orthotopic xenograft model. We hypothesized an orthotopic inoculation of LM2 and LM7 cells would establish a primary lesion and the gene expression profile of cells grafted in this fashion would resemble the gene expression profile observed in an in vitro model. Thirty-five days after inoculation, animals were euthanized and both tibiae were harvested and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Human-specific GAPDH mRNA was present in two of four tibias inoculated with LM2 cells and three of four tibias inoculated with LM7 cells. Tibiae displaying the presence of human cells were assayed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. We observed poor correspondence of in vitro to in vivo gene expression for either cell line. Accordingly, in vitro osteosarcoma gene expression data must be interpreted with caution until confirmed in vivo. Our orthotopic injection model allowed in vivo study of differential gene expression between these two cell lines but did not show radiographic evidence of an established primary lesion.
    Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 06/2008; 466(9):2071-80. DOI:10.1007/s11999-008-0309-1
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads