Connectedness and Citizenship: Redefining Social Integration

Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Psychiatric Services (Impact Factor: 1.99). 05/2007; 58(4):469-74. DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite decades of deinstitutionalization, individuals with psychiatric disabilities living outside the hospital may be described as in the community, but not of it. To effectively address the persisting problem of social exclusion of persons with psychiatric disabilities, new conceptual tools are needed. To address this need, a new definition of social integration is offered.
The definition is based on data from a qualitative study. Data collection consisted of individual, unstructured interviews with 56 adults who have been psychiatrically disabled (N=78 interviews) as well as ethnographic visits to five service sites working to promote social integration for their users (N=8 visits). An interpretive approach was used to analyze the data.
Social integration is defined as a process, unfolding over time, through which individuals who have been psychiatrically disabled increasingly develop and exercise their capacities for connectedness and citizenship. Connectedness denotes the construction and successful maintenance of reciprocal interpersonal relationships. Social, moral, and emotional competencies are required to sustain connectedness. Citizenship refers to the rights and privileges enjoyed by members of a democratic society and to the responsibilities these rights engender. The definition calls for full rights and responsibilities of citizenship.
The new definition sets an ideal, but not unrealistic, standard for social integration in the context of psychiatric disability. High standards encourage mental health professionals and policy makers to rethink what is possible for mental health services and to raise expectations for connectedness and citizenship among persons once disabled by mental illness.

Download full-text


Available from: Kim Hopper, Apr 07, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resurgent hopes for recovery from schizophrenia in the late 1980s had less to do with fresh empirical evidence than with focused political agitation. Recovery's promise was transformative: reworking traditional power relationships, conferring distinctive expertise on service users, rewriting the mandate of public mental health systems. Its institutional imprint has been considerably weaker. This article takes sympathetic measure of that outcome and provides an alternative framework for what recovery might mean, one drawn from disability studies and Sen's capabilities approach. By re-enfranchising agency, redressing material and symbolic disadvantage, raising the bar on fundamental entitlements and claiming institutional support for complex competencies, a capabilities approach could convert flaccid doctrine into useful guidelines and tools for public mental health.
    Social Science & Medicine 10/2007; 65(5):868-79. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.012 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: "Creating Communities" is a study that examines the influence of stable housing on recovery within intentional communities of people living with severe mental illnesses in Washington, DC. We label these configurations "recovery communities" (RCs). The authors aim to identify features of the contextual environment of RCs that contribute to recovery from the perspective of RC residents. Method: Focus groups were conducted with RC residents at 4-month intervals to inquire into day-to-day life in the communities. Focus group transcripts were reviewed and thematic analysis was conducted to identify prominent and emergent themes relating to the RC and recovery. Results: Thematic analysis yielded three contextual domains through which study participants articulate the RC contributing to their recovery: (a) service environment, (b) physical environment, and (c) social environment. RCs are embedded in a complementary service system; the physical environment provides a refuge from homelessness, drug activity, and violence; and the social environment offers a place to "belong" amid peer-support for mental health and sobriety. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Findings suggest the need for recovery-oriented services to be holistic and prepared to address multiple, complex needs that include, but go beyond, clinical efforts to reduce psychiatric symptomatology, substance use, and the impact of trauma. People with serious mental illnesses living in RCs express the need for support that ranges from the very concrete to the less tangible, fundamental need for connection and belonging. As a rehabilitative strategy, RCs offer support for the mitigation of psychiatric challenges as well as a refuge from poverty and homelessness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).
    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 12/2012; 35(6):435-440. DOI:10.1037/h0094576 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although there is now increasing evidence as to the role played by social factors in contributing to the onset of mental health difficulties, there has been little systematic examination of the role that social factors can play in enabling (or impeding) recovery. This paper provides a review of the emerging international literature in this area, and is linked to a wider conceptual review undertaken as part of a major project researching recovery practice in the UK. Research findings are explored in detail in relation to three areas that had been identified by the wider review as central to recovery: empowerment and control over ones life; connectedness (including both inter-personal relationships and social inclusion); and rebuilding positive identities (often within the context of stigma and discrimination). Out of this emerges a clearer picture of the importance of particular social factors, which starts to define a more broad-based and proactive agenda for mental health social work-with an emphasis not just on working with individuals, but also on engaging with families and communities. However, there is a need for further research and development work in order to determine how to intervene most effectively in order to influence specific social factors.
    British Journal of Social Work 04/2011; 42(3):443-460. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcr076 · 1.19 Impact Factor