Article
QUEST-RA: quantitative clinical assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in standard rheumatology care in 15 countries.
Arkisto/Tutkijat, Jyvaskyla Central Hospital, 40620 Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (impact factor:
8.73).
11/2007;
66(11):1491-6.
DOI:10.1136/ard.2006.069252
pp.1491-6
Source: PubMed
- Citations (3)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) has become the most common tool for measuring functional status in rheumatology. However, the HAQ is long (34 questions, including 20 concerning activities of daily living and 14 relating to the use of aids and devices) and somewhat burdensome to score, has some floor effects, and has psychometric problems relating to linearity and confusing items. We undertook this study to develop and validate a revised version of the HAQ (the HAQ-II). Using Rasch analysis and a 31-question item bank, including 20 HAQ items, the 10-item HAQ-II was developed. Five original items from the HAQ were retained. We studied the HAQ-II in 14,038 patients with rheumatic disease over a 2-year period to determine its validity and reliability. The HAQ-II was reliable (reliability of 0.88, compared with 0.83 for the HAQ), measured disability over a longer scale than the HAQ, and had no nonfitting items and no gaps. Compared with the HAQ, modified HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 physical function scale, the HAQ-II was as well correlated or better correlated with clinical and outcome variables. The HAQ-II performed as well as the HAQ in a clinical trial and in prediction of mortality and work disability. The mean difference between the HAQ and HAQ-II scores was 0.02 units. The HAQ-II is a reliable and valid 10-item questionnaire that performs at least as well as the HAQ and is simpler to administer and score. Conversion from HAQ to HAQ-II and from HAQ-II to HAQ for research purposes is simple and reliable. The HAQ-II can be used in all places where the HAQ is now used, and it may prove to be easier to use in the clinic.Arthritis & Rheumatism 11/2004; 50(10):3296-305. · 7.87 Impact Factor -
Article: Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In a prospective study of up to 3 years' duration of 113 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis a disease activity score (DAS) was developed based on the clinical judgment of 6 rheumatologists. The patients were divided in groups with high and low disease activity according to explicit rules. By various statistical methods, including discriminant analysis and multiple regression analysis, a DAS could be defined. This DAS is a continuous measure consisting of the variables Ritchie articular index, number of swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and general health measured on a visual analog scale.The Journal of Rheumatology 04/1993; 20(3):579-81. · 3.69 Impact Factor -
Article: A self-administered rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI) for epidemiologic research. Psychometric properties and correlation with parameters of disease activity.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To examine the psychometric properties and construct validity of a self-administered Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI). Five items of the Rapid Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatology (RADAR) questionnaire were aggregated into the RADAI and assessed for their factor loading, internal consistency, and construct validity. In 55 patients with RA, the RADAI had a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and correlated with physician's assessment of disease activity (r = 0.54, P < 0.01), the swollen joint count (r = 0.54, P < 0.01), and the C-reactive protein value (r = 0.43, P < 0.01). The RADAI is a highly reliable and valid self-administered measure of disease activity for clinical, health services, and epidemiologic research. Its sensitivity to change in longitudinal studies needs further study.Arthritis & Rheumatism 07/1995; 38(6):795-8. · 7.87 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
15 countries
active disease
clinical assessment
clinical research projects
clinical status
cross-sectional review
current disease activity
descriptive statistics
disease activity score
international multicentre cross-sectional database
low disease activity
median DAS28
median regression model
non-selected consecutive outpatients
patient self-report questionnaire
Patients
Quantitative Patient Questionnaires
significant variation
standard clinical care
treatment-related variables