Characterization of Extremity Wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (Impact Factor: 1.8). 05/2007; 21(4):254-7. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802f78fb
Source: PubMed


Extremity wounds and fractures traditionally comprise the majority of traumatic injuries in US armed conflicts. Little has been published regarding the extremity wounding patterns and fracture distribution in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The intent of this study was to describe the distribution of extremity fractures during this current conflict.
Descriptive epidemiologic study.
The Joint Theater Trauma Registry was queried for all US service members receiving treatment for wounds (ICD-9 codes 800-960) sustained in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) from October 2001 through January 2005. Returned-to-duty and nonbattle injuries were excluded. Wounds were classified according to region and type. Extremity wounds were analyzed in detail and compared to published results from previous conflicts.
A total of 1281 soldiers sustained 3575 extremity combat wounds. Fifty-three percent of these were penetrating soft-tissue wounds and 26% were fractures. Of the 915 fractures, 758 (82%) were open fractures. The 915 fractures were evenly distributed between the upper (461, 50%) and lower extremities (454, 50%). The most common fracture in the upper extremity was in the hand (36%) and in the lower extremity was the tibia and fibula (48%). Explosive munitions accounted for 75% of the mechanisms of injury.
The burden of wounds sustained in OIF/OEF is extremity injuries, specifically soft-tissue wounds and fractures. These results are similar to the reported casualties from previous wars.

33 Reads
  • Source
    • ". Although extremity injuries were reported as responsible for the majority of combat wounds in the war phases of Iraq and Afghanistan [19] [20], junctional trauma provided only a small subset of these. Clouse and colleagues [21] audited 6801 casualties presenting to Balad Air Base, the US level 3 surgical facility in Iraq, over a 24 month period up to August 2006. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a recent publication, 297 of 6450 (4.6%) military Coalition deaths over ten years were reported to be due to junctional bleeding. The authors suggested that some of these deaths could have been avoided with a junctional hemorrhage control device. Prospectively collected data on all injuries sustained in Afghanistan by UK military personnel from 1 August 2008 to 31July 2011 period were reviewed, using the UK Joint Theatre Trauma Registry. All fatalities with significant pelvic injuries were identified and analyzed, and the cause of death established to assess the potential role for a junctional haemorrhage control device. Significant upper thigh, groin or pelvic injuries were recorded in 124 casualties, of which 93 died. Of these the pelvic injury was the cause of death in 37, but only 1 casualty with potentially survivable injuries was identified where death was due to a vascular injury below the inguinal ligament, not controlled by a CAT. This represents <1% of all deaths in this period, a lower figure than previously published. We further identified 32 casualties where the cause of death was due to a vascular injury between the aortic bifurcation and the inguinal ligament. Eight of these survived to a medical facility but subsequently died of their wounds. These represent a subset in which vascular control proximal to the inguinal ligament could have altered the outcome. Some potentially survivable deaths due to exsanguination that may be amenable to proximal vascular control. Our study does not substantiate previous conclusions that this can be achieved through use of a groin junctional tourniquet. We believe there may be a role for more proximal vascular control of pelvic bleeding, and this merits further research.
    Injury 10/2014; 45(10). DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.004 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In previous studies characterizing wartime injuries, improvised explosive devices (IEDs) were responsible for approximately 75–78% of all injuries [4] [11]. In this cohort, 92% of all upper extremity amputations compared to 93% of lower extremity amputations were caused by explosive mechanisms. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The purpose of this study is to characterise the injuries, outcomes, and disabling conditions of the isolated, combat-related upper extremity amputees in comparison to the isolated lower extremity amputees and the general amputee population. Methods: A retrospective study of all major extremity amputations sustained by the US military service members from 1 October 2001 to 30 July 2011 was conducted. Data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application, and the Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Offices were queried in order to obtain injury characteristics, demographic information, treatment characteristics, and disability outcome data. Results: A total of 1315 service members who sustained 1631 amputations were identified; of these, 173 service members were identified as sustaining an isolated upper extremity amputation. Isolated upper extremity and isolated lower extremity amputees had similar Injury Severity Scores (21 vs. 20). There were significantly more non-battle-related upper extremity amputees than the analysed general amputation population (39% vs. 14%). Isolated upper extremity amputees had significantly greater combined disability rating (82.9% vs. 62.3%) and were more likely to receive a disability rating >80% (69% vs. 53%). No upper extremity amputees were found fit for duty; only 12 (8.3%) were allowed continuation on active duty; and significantly more upper extremity amputees were permanently retired than lower extremity amputees (82% vs. 74%). The most common non-upper extremity amputation-related disabling condition was post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (17%). Upper extremity amputees were significantly more likely to have disability from PTSD, 13% vs. 8%, and loss of nerve function, 11% vs. 6%, than the general amputee population. Discussion/conclusion: Upper extremity amputees account for 14% of all amputees during the Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom conflicts. These amputees have significant disability and are unable to return to duty. Much of this disability is from their amputation; however, other conditions greatly contribute to their morbidity.
    Injury 06/2014; 45(6):965-969. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.009 · 2.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Indeed, out of more than 40,000 injuries and casualties sustained in these 2 wars, 82% of them resulted in at least one musculoskeletal extremity wound [12]. The extent of these incapacitating injuries includes soft tissue wounds (53%) and fractures (26%), most of which (82%) were severe open fractures [13] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The need for a suitable tissue-engineered scaffold that can be used to heal load-bearing segmental bone defects (SBDs) is both immediate and increasing. During the past 30 years, various ceramic and polymer scaffolds have been investigated for this application. More recently, while composite scaffolds built using a combination of ceramics and polymeric materials are being investigated in a greater number, very few products have progressed from laboratory benchtop studies to preclinical testing in animals. This review is based on an exhaustive literature search of various composite scaffolds designed to serve as bone regenerative therapies. We analyzed the benefits and drawbacks of different composite scaffold manufacturing techniques, the properties of commonly used ceramics and polymers, and the properties of currently investigated synthetic composite grafts. To follow, a comprehensive review of in vivo models used to test composite scaffolds in SBDs is detailed to serve as a guide to design appropriate translational studies and to identify the challenges that need to be overcome in scaffold design for successful translation. This includes selecting the animal type, determining the anatomical location within the animals, choosing the correct study duration, and finally, an overview of scaffold performance assessment.
    07/2013; 2013(1):458253. DOI:10.1155/2013/458253
Show more