Article

Environmental complexity affects contextual fear conditioning following hippocampal lesions in rats

Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Hippocampus (Impact Factor: 4.3). 05/2007; 17(5):333-7. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20275
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Contextual fear conditioning has become a benchmark measure for hippocampal function, even though several studies report successful acquisition in hippocampal-damaged rodents. The current study examined whether environmental complexity may account for these discrepancies. We directly compared single-session contextual fear conditioning in rats in a simple vs. complex environment. Hippocampal lesions led to reduced fear conditioning in both contexts, as measured by freezing, but the effect was significantly greater in the complex context. As well, lesions led to generalized fear when the complex context was paired with shock, but not when the simple context was paired. We suggest that the representation of the simple context formed by rats with hippocampal lesions was adequate to support associative learning, but the representation of the complex context, which depended to a greater extent on relational learning, was not. The results were interpreted as consistent with theories of hippocampal function that emphasize its role in integrating multiple stimulus elements in a memory trace.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Morris Moscovitch, Apr 13, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
84 Views
  • Source
    • "However, the context itself is multifactorial and can vary in terms of the shape, colour, pattern and texture of the conditioning chamber, the shape and size of the room where training and testing occur, as well as the number and type of distal stimuli distributed in the surrounding environment and their relation to each other. As indicated above, only one study (Moses et al., 2007) has attempted to manipulate context systematically , but even that one did not investigate the effect of variation within a complex context and how it may interact with the other variables. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review evaluates three current theories - Standard Consolidation (Squire & Wixted, 2011), Overshadowing (Sutherland, Sparks, & Lehmann, 2010), and Multiple Trace- Transformation (Winocur, Moscovitch, & Bontempi, 2010a) - in terms of their ability to account for the role of the hippocampus in recent and remote memory in animals. Evidence, based on consistent findings from tests of spatial memory and memory for acquired food preferences, favours the transformation account, but this conclusion is undermined by inconsistent results from studies that measured contextual fear memory, probably the most commonly used test of hippocampal involvement in anterograde and retrograde memory. Resolution of this issue may depend on exercising greater control over critical factors (e.g., contextual environment, amount of pre-exposure to the conditioning chamber, the number and distribution of foot-shocks) that can affect the representation of the memory shortly after learning and over the long-term. Research strategies aimed at characterizing the neural basis of long-term consolidation/transformation, as well as other outstanding issues are discussed.
    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 10/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.10.001 · 4.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Different contextual factors, such as whether the tobacco stimulus depicts cigarettes from the beginning or the end of smoking (Mucha et al. 2008; Winkler et al. 2010), or whether smokers are at that moment motivated to quit smoking or not (Dempsey et al. 2007), may modulate reactivity to smoking cues suppressing or even reversing the physiological response. Evidence of context effects in nonhuman animals is relatively extensive (Moses et al. 2007; Walker and Davis 2002; Siegel and Ramos 2002). However, research on context effects in humans is still in its infancy (Grillon 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cue reactivity and startle reflex modulation paradigms have been used in addiction research to determine the affective motivational state of craving induced by viewing drug-related cues. However, recent studies suggest that cue reactivity and startle reflex modulation in people with addictions can be suppressed, or even reversed, depending on context. The present study looked at the contextual specificity of smoking cue startle modulation by examining individuals with low and high motivation to quit smoking. Emotional modulation of the startle reflex was examined in 32 female smokers exposed to affective stimuli and tobacco cues. The sample was divided into high and low motivation to quit smoking groups using the Processes of Change Questionnaire. The tobacco cues produced a greater startle magnitude in the group with high motivation to quit smoking than the group with low motivation, which was independent of craving level. Motivation to be abstinent is a relevant contextual factor accounting for variance in cue reactivity in individual smokers.
    Psychopharmacology 05/2011; 218(3):525-32. DOI:10.1007/s00213-011-2334-0 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Not all studies find that lesions of the hippocampus affect context conditioning (Frankland et al. 1998; McNish et al. 1997; Winocur 1997). Recent preclinical evidence indicates that context conditioning is hippocampus-dependent for complex but not simple environments (Moses et al. 2007). This is consistent with human findings demonstrating that context conditioning with unidimensional contextual stimuli fails to activate the hippocampus (Armony and Dolan 2001), while more complex spatial environments do activate the hippocampus. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Preclinical data indicates that threat stimuli elicit two classes of defensive behaviors, those that are associated with imminent danger and are characterized by flight or fight (fear), and those that are associated with temporally uncertain danger and are characterized by sustained apprehension and hypervigilance (anxiety). The objectives of the study are to (1) review evidence for a distinction between fear and anxiety in animal and human experimental models using the startle reflex as an operational measure of aversive states, (2) describe experimental models of anxiety, as opposed to fear, in humans, (3) examine the relevance of these models to clinical anxiety. The distinction between phasic fear to imminent threat and sustained anxiety to temporally uncertain danger is suggested by psychopharmacological and behavioral evidence from ethological studies and can be traced back to distinct neuroanatomical systems, the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Experimental models of anxiety, not fear, are relevant to non-phobic anxiety disorders. Progress in our understanding of normal and abnormal anxiety is critically dependent on our ability to model sustained aversive states to temporally uncertain threat.
    Psychopharmacology 09/2008; 199(3):421-37. DOI:10.1007/s00213-007-1019-1 · 3.99 Impact Factor
Show more