Human brain activation during phonation and exhalation: common volitional control for two upper airway functions.

Laryngeal and Speech Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.13). 06/2007; 36(1):131-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.049
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Phonation is defined as a laryngeal motor behavior used for speech production, which involves a highly specialized coordination of laryngeal and respiratory neuromuscular control. During speech, brief periods of vocal fold vibration for vowels are interspersed by voiced and unvoiced consonants, glottal stops and glottal fricatives (/h/). It remains unknown whether laryngeal/respiratory coordination of phonation for speech relies on separate neural systems from respiratory control or whether a common system controls both behaviors. To identify the central control system for human phonation, we used event-related fMRI to contrast brain activity during phonation with activity during prolonged exhalation in healthy adults. Both whole-brain analyses and region of interest comparisons were conducted. Production of syllables containing glottal stops and vowels was accompanied by activity in left sensorimotor, bilateral temporoparietal and medial motor areas. Prolonged exhalation similarly involved activity in left sensorimotor and temporoparietal areas but not medial motor areas. Significant differences between phonation and exhalation were found primarily in the bilateral auditory cortices with whole-brain analysis. The ROI analysis similarly indicated task differences in the auditory cortex with differences also detected in the inferolateral motor cortex and dentate nucleus of the cerebellum. A second experiment confirmed that activity in the auditory cortex only occurred during phonation for speech and did not depend upon sound production. Overall, a similar central neural system was identified for both speech phonation and voluntary exhalation that primarily differed in auditory monitoring.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The larynx is the major organ of vocalization. The intrinsic laryngeal muscles modify the internal shape of the larynx while the extrinsic laryngeal muscles move the entire larynx vertically in the airway. Previous neuroimaging research has established the somatotopic location of the intrinsic musculature of the larynx in the human motor cortex and showed it to be in an evolutionarily novel location compared to the homologous region in monkey cortex. In the current study, we attempted for the first time to determine the somatotopic localization of the extrinsic laryngeal musculature in humans. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, we had participants voluntarily move their larynx upward and/or downward in the airway in the absence of vocalization to engage the extrinsic laryngeal muscles or vocalize in the absence of vertical laryngeal movement to engage the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. Vertical movement of the larynx activated ventral pericentral sensorimotor cortex extending dorsally to overlap with the representation of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. This pattern is a reversal from the somatotopy of the monkey, where the extrinsic laryngeal muscles are represented dorsally to the intrinsic laryngeal muscles.
    Behavioural Brain Research 05/2014; · 3.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bodily self-consciousness depends on the processing of interoceptive and exteroceptive signals. It can be disrupted by inducing signal conflicts. Breathing, at the crossroad between interoception and exteroception, should contribute to bodily self-consciousness. We induced visuo-respiratory conflicts in 17 subjects presented with a virtual body or a parallelepidedal object flashing synchronously or asynchronously with their breathing. A questionnaire detected illusory changes in bodily self-consciousness and breathing agency (the feeling of sensing one's breathing command). Changes in self-location were tested by measuring reaction time during mental ball drop (MBD). Synchronous illumination changed the perceived location of breathing (body: p = 0.008 vs. asynchronous; object: p = 0.013). It resulted in a significant change in breathing agency, but no changes in self-identification. This was corroborated by prolonged MBD reaction time (body: +0.045 sec, 95%CI [0.013; 0.08] p = 0.007). We conclude that breathing modulates bodily self-consciousness. We also conclude that one can induce the irruption of unattended breathing into consciousness without modifying respiratory mechanics or gas exchange.
    Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 09/2014; · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Speech is a major disturbance to automatic breathing control. Speech occurs during exhalation, involving controlled inhibition of automatic inspiration. Additionnally, utterances are preceded by prephonatory inspirations that must be prepared to account for prosody and loudness. We hypothesized that the speech-related breathing control activities shaping prephonatory breaths originate in cortical pre-motor areas and should be associated with corresponding EEG evidence. We studied 10 normal subjects (4 men, age 23-27) during spontaneous breathing, sniff manoeuvres, and while reading out loud. Fronto-median inspiratory potentials (Cz EEG derivation) were consistently present before voluntary inspirations and large prephonatory breaths, while these potentials were generally absent during resting breathing or small prephonatory breaths. We conclude that the preparation of prephonatory breaths during speech has a cortical substrate, involving the cortical sources of premotor potentials. These results have important implications to validate whether co-modulation of the pre-motor cortex and breathing during speech are incidental or whether these cortical modulations are necessary for initiation of “speech breathing”.
    Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology 12/2014; · 1.97 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014