Article

Review. Evidence-based complementary oncology. Innovative approaches to optimize standard therapy strategies.

University of Cologne, Institute for Naturopathy, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 9, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
In vivo (Athens, Greece) (Impact Factor: 1.15). 21(2):423-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cancer diseases demand diagnostic and therapeutic measures with proven quality, safety and efficacy. The basis for evaluation is clinical studies representing levels I or II (randomized controlled trials (RCT) or epidemiological cohort studies) in accordance with recommendations of the Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, University of Oxford, UK Regarding these claims, surgery, chemo-, radio- and hormone therapy have emerged as the gold standard in the treatment of carcinomas. These therapies have proven their cancer destructive potencies and their curative feasibilities, dependent on the particular cancer entity and stage. Complementary therapies are recommended to support and optimize the scientifically-based cancer standard treatment. Complementary medicine is currently widely debated by the oncological community, because the required scientific proof of safety and effectiveness for most of the therapeutic approaches has not yet been definitively provided. In the past years, basic research and clinical evaluation of defined complementary therapeutic concepts in oncology have been intensified in an attempt to integrate these procedures into evidence-based medicine. Scientifically-based therapies of complementary medicine cannot replace the well studied conventional cancer-destructive therapies such as surgery, chemo-, radio- or hormone therapy. Accordingly, they are by no means "alternative therapies". Complementary approaches in oncology that are recommended as additional to standard cancer destructive therapies claim to optimize this therapy. A great body of data emerging from scientifically sound clinical trials prove that defined complementary procedures are beneficial for the patients.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
100 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complementary medicine is currently widely debated by the oncologic community, because the required scientific proof of safety and effectiveness for most of the therapeutic approaches ha s not yet been met with definite results. In the past years, basic research and clinical evaluation of defined complementary therapeutic concepts in oncology have been intensified in an attempt to integrate these procedures into evidence-based medicine. According to definition, scientifically-based therapies of complementary medicine cannot replace the well-studied conventional cancer-destructive therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy. Complementary approaches in oncology that are recommended as an addition to standard cancer-destructive therapies claim to optimize this therapy. A great body of data emerging from scientifically sound clinical trials prove that defined complementary procedures are beneficial for the patients.
    Breast Care 01/2009; 4(1):8-12. · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spine surgery has been significantly influenced during the past 20 years by improvements in anaesthesia and radiology. This progress has also been promoted by technical developments in spinal instrumentation, mainly the introduction of pedicle screws and anterior support with cages. Both techniques allow correction and stabilisation methods that have had a major effect on tumour surgery. These advancements have allowed less experienced spine surgeons to perform tumour surgery, which may have a negative effect on the outcome. From our point of view, it should be required that tumour surgery be performed only in hospitals managing a certain number of tumours annually. For optimal results, en bloc resection and intralesional marginal resection in particular are highly demanding of the surgeon's technical skills and experience. Second and third operations complicate the intervention unnecessarily. Normally, R0 resection can not be achieved by a second or third revision. For this reason tumour surgery requires a standardised overall concept which must be suited to individual problems. This can be best decided in a tumour board meeting for choosing the options for adjuvant therapy. Only by such a coordinated effort may good mid- and long-term results be achieved.It must be pointed out that en bloc resection is the only surgical therapy that makes a curative approach possible. On the other hand it can also be demonstrated that by making extended, intralesional marginal resections as radical as possible, good mid-term results can be achieved. Here the adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy play an important role.
    Der Chirurg 10/2008; 79(10):927-8, 930-6. · 0.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complementary medicine (CM) use is common among cancer patients. However, little is known about CM products that are utilised during radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Out of 62 cancer patients who completed a specialised survey, 35 (56%) consumed some type of CM during active anti-cancer therapy. Cancer patients reported the use of herbal teas (52%), vitamins and other dietary supplements (45%), vegetables and juices (39%), special diets (19%), herbal medicines, including Chinese medicines (19%) and 'immunomodulators' (3%). Most of patients (86%) consumed CM products every day. However, nearly 47% of CM users did not admit this to their oncologists. Majority of CM users (85%) were convinced that supplementary products increase the efficacy of standard anti-cancer therapy and prolong their survival. Information about CM was mainly obtained through internet sources (36%), books and brochures (25%). Although most CM users (82%) trusted the received information, 73% of them admitted that additional information about CM methods would be necessary. Patients would like to receive additional information through a specialised consultation (60%), but also from brochures (44%) and the internet (20%). Adequate counselling of patients is of paramount importance since some CM methods may cause significant side effects and decrease the efficacy of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy.
    European Journal of Cancer Care 09/2013; · 1.31 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from