Biology by numbers: mathematical modelling in developmental biology.

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Nature Reviews Genetics (Impact Factor: 39.79). 06/2007; 8(5):331-40. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2098
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In recent years, mathematical modelling of developmental processes has earned new respect. Not only have mathematical models been used to validate hypotheses made from experimental data, but designing and testing these models has led to testable experimental predictions. There are now impressive cases in which mathematical models have provided fresh insight into biological systems, by suggesting, for example, how connections between local interactions among system components relate to their wider biological effects. By examining three developmental processes and corresponding mathematical models, this Review addresses the potential of mathematical modelling to help understand development.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mathematical modeling of developmental signaling networks has played an increasingly important role in the identification of regulatory mechanisms by providing a sandbox for hypothesis testing and experiment design. Whether these models consist of an equation with a few parameters or dozens of equations with hundreds of parameters, a prerequisite to model-based discovery is to bring simulated behavior into agreement with observed data via parameter estimation. These parameters provide insight into the system (e.g., enzymatic rate constants describe enzyme properties). Depending on the nature of the model fit desired - from qualitative (relative spatial positions of phosphorylation) to quantitative (exact agreement of spatial position and concentration of gene products) - different measures of data-model mismatch are used to estimate different parameter values, which contain different levels of usable information and/or uncertainty. To facilitate the adoption of modeling as a tool for discovery alongside other tools such as genetics, immunostaining, and biochemistry, careful consideration needs to be given to how well a model fits the available data, what the optimized parameter values mean in a biological context, and how the uncertainty in model parameters and predictions plays into experiment design. The core discussion herein pertains to the quantification of model-to-data agreement, which constitutes the first measure of a model's performance and future utility to the problem at hand. Integration of this experimental data and the appropriate choice of objective measures of data-model agreement will continue to drive modeling forward as a tool that contributes to experimental discovery. The Drosophila melanogaster gap gene system, in which model parameters are optimized against in situ immunofluorescence intensities, demonstrates the importance of error quantification, which is applicable to a wide array of developmental modeling studies.
    Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 11/2014; 35. DOI:10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.06.017 · 5.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we propose a method to predict gene knockout effects for the cell growth by utilizing biological databases such as KEGG and EcoCyc, in which biological knowledge and experimental results have been collected. We construct biological networks from such databases and con-figure experimental conditions by giving source metabolites, target metabolites, and knockout genes. We then enumerate all minimal active pathways, which are minimal subsets of a given network using source metabolites to produce target metabolites. We simulate the effects of gene knockouts by measuring the difference of minimal active pathways between original networks and knockout ones. In the experiments, we applied it to predict the gene knockout effects on the glycolysis pathway of Escherichia coli. In the results, our method predicted three out of four essential genes, which are confirmed by the Keio collection containing comprehensive cell growth data obtained from biological experiments.
  • Source


Available from