Article

The role of CnTI-SonoVue in the diagnosis of ovarian masses with papillary projections: a preliminary study

Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.14). 05/2007; 29(5):512-6. DOI: 10.1002/uog.4013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe sonographically the distribution patterns of a second-generation contrast agent in the microcirculation of unilocular and multilocular ovarian masses with papillary projections, and to investigate whether qualitative evaluation of the passage of the contrast agent can improve the performance of sonography in distinguishing between benign and malignant masses with papillary projections.
Thirty-three patients with unilocular or multilocular ovarian masses with papillary projections were enrolled into the study in three clinical centers. The contrast-enhanced transvaginal examination was performed using 'Contrast Tuned Imaging' (CnTI) technology and SonoVue ultrasound contrast agent.
Twenty-four (73%) lesions were benign, eight (24%) were borderline ovarian tumors, and one patient presented with an endometrioid ovarian adenocarcinoma. On color and power Doppler examinations the presence of vessels was demonstrated in 17 papillary projections, while on CnTI-SonoVue examination, the presence of vessels was shown in these 17 and in six additional cases. In all cases with absent papillary perfusion after SonoVue intravenous injection, the cyst wall appeared unequivocally regular. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional color Doppler examination with regard to malignancy were 100% and 67% and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.03 and 0.16, respectively. For the contrast-enhanced examination the corresponding values were 100%, 42%, 1.7 and 0.26. The difference in specificity was statistically significant (P<0.05) because 14 cases, in which papillary perfusion was detected after SonoVue injection, proved to be benign on pathological examination.
Qualitative evaluation of blood circulation in papillary projections using CnTI-SonoVue examination does not improve the discrimination of benign from borderline/malignant ovarian masses with papillary projections.

Full-text

Available from: Domenico Arduini, Jan 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
71 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of qualitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in discrimination of adnexal masses which were undetermined by conventional ultrasound (US). A total of 120 patients underwent transabdominal CEUS. The initial enhancement time and intensity compared with the uterine myometrium, contrast agent distribution patterns and dynamic changes of enhancement were assessed. The sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy (ACC) and Youden's index were calculated for contrast variables. The gold standard was the histological diagnosis. There were 48 malignant tumors and 72 benign tumors. The enhancement features of malignant masses were different from benign ones. Earlier or simultaneous enhancement with inhomogeneous enhancement yielded the highest capability in differential diagnosis, and Sen, Spe, PPV, NPV, ACC, Youden's index was 89.6%, 97.2%, 93.2%, 95.6%, 93.3%, and 0.88, respectively. The qualitative evaluation of CEUS is useful in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses where conventional US is indeterminate.
    PLoS ONE 04/2014; 9(4):e93843. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093843 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To discriminate ovarian lesions is of particular importance in gynecological practice. Two main problems need answers: discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal masses and choice of the appropriate surgical treatment if necessary. Nearly 2% of the adnexal masses are ovarian carcinomas or borderline tumors. It is now, well established that ultrasonography is the gold standard for ovarian cyst diagnosis. The purpose of this data was to review the literature and to establish, with the evidence base medicine model, which parameters and existing diagnostic models using ultrasound and Doppler perform best in the evaluation of adnexal masses. Transvaginal sonography has demonstrated considerable advantage over conventional transabdominal sonography. However, transparietal sonography is still useful in large tumors. Definition of the nomenclature and classification was done and should be used. Unilocular ovarian cyst characterization seems easy using sonography and Doppler. In front of complication, discrimination of such functional cyst may be difficult but spontaneous regression confirms usually the expectative management. Dermoid cysts and endometriomas seem to be easier to discriminate from other adnexal masses. Ultrasound and morphologic parameters have a sensitivity of about 90% and a specificity of 80%; that makes this exam the gold standard for ovarian masses diagnosis. Only 50% of ovarian masses are characterized by sonography. Scoring systems help to differentiate benign from malignant masses (sensitivity of about 90%). Logistic regression and models are good methods especially for LR1 and 2 and RMI and may be useful for malignancy prediction but are difficult to use in current practice. Expert diagnosis is a subjective but most important performing parameter. Any suspicious ovarian mass or not easily diagnosed mass requires sonography by an expert, which can first use all the techniques and the different parameters to discriminate benign and malignant tumors. An explicit report will help the physician to define the right attitude for an appropriate management. Six to 16% of adnexial masses are complex or not classified and will result in MRI prescription or surgery.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 11/2013; 42(8). DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.028 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced sonography in discriminating between benign and malignant small adnexal masses. Methods Selected patients were evaluated with both 2D and 3D contrast-enhanced sonography after conventional sonography before undergoing any surgery. Time-intensity curves for 2D contrast-enhanced sonography were constructed by using contrast-enhanced sonographic software. A vascular perfusion characteristic analysis was achieved by 2D and 3D contrast-enhanced sonography. Results were finally verified by surgery. Results Forty-seven cases of benign and 10 cases of malignant small adnexal masses were discovered. Significant differences in perfusion patterns, time-intensity curve shapes for 2D contrast-enhanced sonography, grayscale contrast-enhanced sonography, and blood flow imaging on 3D contrast-enhanced sonography were observed between benign and malignant masses (P<.05). Two-dimensional contrast-enhanced sonography, 3D contrast-enhanced sonography, parallel combination of 2D and 3D contrast-enhanced sonography, and serial combination of 2D and 3D contrast-enhanced sonography all reached diagnostic sensitivity of 100% for discriminating benign from malignant masses, whereas specificity values were 61.7%, 63.8%, 68.1%, and 57.4%, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.809, 0.819, 0.840, and 0.787. Conclusions Two-dimensional contrast-enhanced sonography is of high value in distinguishing malignant from benign small adnexal masses; 3D contrast-enhanced sonography provides richer and more useful information for evaluation of these masses. Diagnostic sensitivity of 100% can be achieved when using a serial combination of 2D and 3D contrast-enhanced sonography, although specificity needs further improvement.
    Journal of ultrasound in medicine: official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 11/2014; 33(11):1889-99. DOI:10.7863/ultra.33.11.1889 · 1.53 Impact Factor