Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine.

General Intensive Care Unit "Bozza," Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Critical Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 06/2007; 35(5 Suppl):S290-304. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260680.16213.26
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Accurate assessment and rapid decision-making are essential to save lives and improve performance in critical care medicine. Real-time point-of-care ultrasound has become an invaluable adjunct to the clinical evaluation of critically ill and injured patients both for pre- and in-hospital situations. However, a high level of quality is necessary, guaranteed by appropriate education, experience, credentialing, quality control, continuing education, and professional development. Although educational recommendations have been proposed by a variety of nonimaging specialties, to date they are still scattered and limited examples of standards for critical and intensive care professionals. The challenge of providing adequate specialty-specific training, as encouraged by major medical societies, is made even more difficult by the diversity of critical care ultrasound utilization by various subspecialties in a variety of settings and numerous countries. In order to meet this educational challenge, a standard core curriculum is presented in this manuscript. The proposed curriculum is built on a competence, performance, and outcomes-based approach that is tailored to setting-specific training needs and prioritized according to critical problem-based pathways, rather than traditional organ-based systems. A multiple goal-oriented style fully addresses the specialty-specific approach of critical and intensive care professionals, who typically deal with disease states in complex scenarios rather than individual organ complaints. Because of the variation in the concept of what constitutes critical care worldwide, and the rate of change of information and technology, this manuscript attempts to present a learning system addressing a variety of needs for a rapidly changing world.


Available from: Daniel Lichtenstein, Jun 12, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IFEM has developed this document on point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) training programs and practice governance as part of an effort to provide structure and suggested guidelines for best practice. It was developed as a consensus document drawing on regional and national guidelines already in practice around the world. It is not meant to be prescriptive, but rather to outline the important features of a sound training and practice program. This is in contrast to the World Health Organization and World Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines, which tend to focus on practice guidelines for comprehensive consultative diagnostic ultrasound imaging; the distinction between PoCUS and consultative ultrasound imaging is important. Definitions of PoCUS are discussed below in more detail. PoCUS is not meant to replace comprehensive ultrasound imaging, which is a consultative test that focuses on traditional radiologic methods for fully evaluating anatomy and physiology. Rather, it is a complementary diagnostic tool that can help make the clinician more efficient, more independent, and more confident in their medical decision-making.
    1 03/2014; International Federation for Emergency Medicine., ISBN: 978-0-9873901-2-7
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Teleradiology experiences from workstation to wireless technology and discrepancies from an “ideal world” of guidelines and a “real world” of medical practice are detailed. The real predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale admission for the outcome of brain-injured patients and differences regarding the outcome of traumatic brain injury patients treated with or without neurosurgical facilities are outlined. Also examined is how to detect the computed tomography evolution before the neurologic change and the application of guidelines with area protocol and “hub and spoke” systems is discussed.
    01/1970: pages 181-202;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the feasibility and describe the process of implementing a pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program in a large academic PICU and to evaluate the impact of bedside ultrasound on clinical management. Retrospective case series, description of program implementation. Single-center quaternary noncardiac PICU in a children's hospital. Consecutive patients from January 22, 2012, to July 22, 2012, with bedside ultrasounds performed and interpreted by pediatric critical care practitioners. A pediatric critical care bedside ultrasound program consisting of a 2-day immersive course followed by clinical performance with internal quality assurance review was implemented. Studies performed in the PICU following training were documented and reviewed against reference standards including subspecialist-performed ultrasound or clinical response. Seventeen critical care faculties and eight fellows recorded 201 bedside ultrasound studies over 6 months in defined core applications: 57 procedural (28%), 76 hemodynamic (38%), 35 thoracic (17%), and 33 abdominal (16%). A quality assurance review identified 23 studies (16% of all nonprocedural studies) as critical (affected clinical management or gave valuable information). Forty-eight percent of those studies (11/23) were within the hemodynamic core. The proportion of critical studies were not significantly different across the applications (hemodynamic, 11/76 [15%] vs thoracic and abdominal, 12/68 [18%]; p = 0.65). Examples of critical studies include evidence of tamponade secondary to pleural effusions, identification of pulmonary hypertension, hemodynamic assessment before tracheal intubation, recognition of hypovolemia and systemic vascular resistance abnormalities, determination of pneumothorax, location of chest tube and urinary catheter, and differentiation of pleural fluid from pulmonary consolidation. Implementation of a critical care bedside ultrasound program for critical care providers in a large academic PICU is feasible. Bedside ultrasound evaluation and interpretation by intensivists affected the management of critically ill children.
    Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 01/2015; DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000340 · 2.33 Impact Factor