Longitudinal MRI findings from the Vitamin E and Donepezil Treatment Study for MCI

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Neurobiology of aging (Impact Factor: 5.01). 09/2008; 29(9):1285-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.03.004
Source: PubMed


The vitamin E and donepezil trial for the treatment of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was conducted at 69 centers in North America; 24 centers participated in an MRI sub study. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment on MRI atrophy rates; and validate rate measures from serial MRI as indicators of disease progression in multi center therapeutic trials for MCI. Annual percent change (APC) from baseline to follow-up was measured for hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, whole brain, and ventricle in the 131 subjects who remained in the treatment study and completed technically satisfactory baseline and follow-up scans. Although a non-significant trend toward slowing of hippocampal atrophy rates was seen in APOE is an element of 4 carriers treated with donepezil; no treatment effect was confirmed for any MRI measure in either treatment group. For each of the four brain atrophy rate measures, APCs were greater in subjects who converted to AD than non-converters, and were greater in APOE is an element of 4 carriers than non-carriers. MRI APCs and changes in cognitive test performance were uniformly correlated in the expected direction (all p<0.000). Results of this study support the feasibility of using MRI as an outcome measure of disease progression in multi center therapeutic trials for MCI.

Download full-text


Available from: Chadwick Ward, Mar 18, 2014
  • Source
    • "Sample size calculations based on natural history studies would support this with only 20% as many patients being expected to be needed for the same effect using MRI measures than if clinical scales were used (Fox et al. 2000; Jack et al. 2008a; Ridha et al. 2008; Schuff et al. 2009). Rates of hippocampal and whole brain atrophy on MRI have to date been the most widely included imaging measures in trials; however, other MRI measures show promise, including cortical thickness or composites of change (Lerch et al. 2005; Hua et al. 2008; Jack et al. 2008a; Vemuri et al. 2009). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Imaging has played a variety of roles in the study of Alzheimer disease (AD) over the past four decades. Initially, computed tomography (CT) and then magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used diagnostically to rule out other causes of dementia. More recently, a variety of imaging modalities including structural and functional MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral metabolism with fluoro-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) and amyloid tracers such as Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) have shown characteristic changes in the brains of patients with AD, and in prodromal and even presymptomatic states that can help rule-in the AD pathophysiological process. No one imaging modality can serve all purposes as each have unique strengths and weaknesses. These modalities and their particular utilities are discussed in this article. The challenge for the future will be to combine imaging biomarkers to most efficiently facilitate diagnosis, disease staging, and, most importantly, development of effective disease-modifying therapies.
    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 04/2012; 2(4):a006213. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a006213 · 9.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "patients not receiving therapy with these agents (Lopez et al. 2009; Rountree et al. 2009). Other clinical and imaging studies, however, suggest no disease-modifying benefit from treatment with AChE-Is (Jack et al. 2008; Schneider and Sano 2009). Disease-modifying effects, if present , must be small in magnitude. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this work we consider marketed drugs for Alzheimer disease (AD) including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE-Is) and antiglutamatergic treatment involving the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. We discuss medications and substances available for use as cognitive enhancers that are not approved for AD or cognitive impairment, and other neurotransmitter-related therapies in development or currently being researched. We also review putative therapies that aim to slow disease progression by mechanisms not directly related to amyloid or tau.
    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 03/2012; 2(3):a006395. DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a006395 · 9.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In AD, there is also a greater rate of brain atrophy over time compared with healthy elderly subjects (1.9–2.2% per year versus 0.5–0.7% per year; O'Brien et al., 2001; Sluimer et al., 2008a,b; Henneman et al., 2009). Hippocampal and whole-brain atrophy in AD correlated well with cognitive performance and measures of disease severity (Jack et al., 2008a; Ridha et al., 2008; Schott et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly, and it is characterized by progressive impairment in multiple cognitive domains of sufficient severity to interfere with individuals' daily living activities. Historically, the diagnosis of AD has been based on the identification of a clinical syndrome, and accuracy studies of the current clinical criteria conducted in referral clinics have shown high sensitivity for AD. However, the identification of the disease is still not perfect, and there is growing evidence that the use of biomarkers will increase our ability to better indentify the underlying biology of AD, especially in its early stages. These biomarkers will improve the detection of the patients suitable for research studies and drug trials, and they will contribute to a better management of the disease in the clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the most studied biomarkers in AD: cerebrospinal fluid proteins, structural magnetic resonance imaging, functional neuroimaging techniques, and amyloid imaging.
    Frontiers in Neurology 07/2011; 2:46. DOI:10.3389/fneur.2011.00046
Show more