Article

Contribution of reference electrode to the compound muscle action potential

Viasys Health Care, 5225 Verona Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 52217, USA.
Muscle & Nerve (Impact Factor: 2.31). 07/2007; 36(1):87-92. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20798
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In compound muscle action potential (CMAP) recording, the contribution by the reference electrode is considered to be much smaller than that of the active electrode. We tested this assumption by making quantitative measurements of the signals recorded individually by the active and reference electrodes. In the thenar (median nerve) and extensor digitorum brevis (peroneal nerve) muscles, the reference electrode did contribute less. In the hypothenar muscle (ulnar nerve), however, the signals recorded by active and reference electrodes were of similar amplitude. In tibial nerve conduction studies (NCS), the CMAP from the abductor hallucis (AH) muscle was recorded mainly by the reference electrode; the large-amplitude signal recorded by the reference electrode is attributed to volume-conducted activity from other muscles stimulated during the study. The onset latency of the potential recorded by the active and reference electrodes was similar despite significantly different distances from the stimulating site. Hence, the merits of using anatomic landmarks for defining the distal stimulation site are assessed. When the reference electrode makes a large contribution, the CMAP amplitude may not decrease commensurate with any wasting of the muscle under the active recording electrode, and the need to use another muscle for recording the CMAP for that nerve should be considered.

1 Follower
 · 
255 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study disease progression in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we have developed the "cumulative motor index (CMI)" using the compound muscle action potential amplitude recorded in multiple upper and lower limb muscles. To study its reproducibility, CMI was measured by 2 operators in 10 healthy subjects on 2 occasions. In 15 patients with ALS, CMI and ALS functional rating score (revised) were measured at 3- to 6-month interval for 12 months or longer. The CMI had good reproducibility in healthy subjects. In one patient with ALS, CMI and ALS functional rating score (revised) remained relatively unchanged. In all remaining 14 patients with disease progression, CMI decreased in a relatively monotonic manner. At 1 year after baseline study, CMI was reduced more than ALS functional rating score (revised) in 10 patients. CMI measurements were possible for longer time period, than analysis from a single distal muscle recording. The CMI can be measured using standard equipment and software available in most electrodiagnostic laboratories. This may be a simple measurement that can be used for clinical studies of ALS progression over longer time periods.
    Journal of clinical neurophysiology: official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society 02/2015; 32(1):79-85. DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000116 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Electrodiagnostic testing is used widely for the full characterization of neuromuscular disorders and for providing unique information on the processes underlying the pathology of peripheral nerves and muscles. However, such testing should be considered as an extension of anamnesis and physical examination, not as pathognomonic of a specific disease entity. There are many pitfalls that could lead to erroneous interpretation of electrophysiological study results when the studies are not performed properly or if they are performed in the presence of anatomical aberrations. The diagnostic reliability of electrodiagnostic studies can be improved and the associated pitfalls overcome if the physician is familiar with all of those possible pitfalls. In this article we discuss the most common and important pitfalls associated with electrodiagnostic medicine.
    Journal of Clinical Neurology 03/2012; 8(1):1-14. DOI:10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.1 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When recording compound muscle action potentials, the active electrode is traditionally placed over the muscle and the reference over the corresponding tendon (belly-tendon recording). This placement assumes that the reference electrode is electrically inactive. We report on the influence of reference electrode placement on the compound muscle action potential recorded from the flexor digiti minimi brevis. We recorded compound muscle action potentials from the flexor digiti minimi brevis using belly electrodes, tendon electrodes, and an electrode on the contralateral medial malleolus from 11 healthy subjects. We measured compound muscle action potential amplitudes and onset latencies. Compound muscle action potentials recorded using electrodes on a tendon and the contralateral medial malleolus had higher amplitudes and shorter onset latencies than the compound muscle action potentials recorded with the belly-tendon montage. When recording compound muscle action potentials from flexor digiti minimi brevis, the influences of the tendon "reference" electrode on latency and amplitude are large. Electrodiagnositicians should consider the influences of the reference electrode when assessing the lateral plantar nerve. This study may also inform us about the influence of proximally innervated muscles on the compound muscle action potential recorded in the limbs.
    American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists 07/2010; 89(7):570-5. DOI:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ddd1cb · 2.01 Impact Factor