Vissers, L.E. et al. Complex chromosome 17p rearrangements associated with low-copy repeats in two patients with congenital anomalies. Hum. Genet. 121, 697-709

Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Human Genetics (Impact Factor: 4.82). 08/2007; 121(6):697-709. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-007-0359-6
Source: PubMed


Recent molecular cytogenetic data have shown that the constitution of complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) may be more complicated than previously thought. The complicated nature of these rearrangements challenges the accurate delineation of the chromosomal breakpoints and mechanisms involved. Here, we report a molecular cytogenetic analysis of two patients with congenital anomalies and unbalanced de novo CCRs involving chromosome 17p using high-resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In the first patient, a 4-month-old boy with developmental delay, hypotonia, growth retardation, coronal synostosis, mild hypertelorism, and bilateral club feet, we found a duplication of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A and Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS) chromosome regions, inverted insertion of the Miller-Dieker lissencephaly syndrome region into the SMS region, and two microdeletions including a terminal deletion of 17p. The latter, together with a duplication of 21q22.3-qter detected by array CGH, are likely the unbalanced product of a translocation t(17;21)(p13.3;q22.3). In the second patient, an 8-year-old girl with mental retardation, short stature, microcephaly and mild dysmorphic features, we identified four submicroscopic interspersed 17p duplications. All 17 breakpoints were examined in detail by FISH analysis. We found that four of the breakpoints mapped within known low-copy repeats (LCRs), including LCR17pA, middle SMS-REP/LCR17pB block, and LCR17pC. Our findings suggest that the LCR burden in proximal 17p may have stimulated the formation of these CCRs and, thus, that genome architectural features such as LCRs may have been instrumental in the generation of these CCRs.

Download full-text


Available from: Lisenka E L M Vissers,

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Vissers, L.E. et al. Complex chromosome 17p rearrangements associated with low-copy repeats in two patients with congenital anomalies. Hum. Genet. 121, 697-709

665.4 KB

See full-text
  • Source
    • "In addition to this, simple rearrangements account for the vast majority of RAF gene fusions (95%), which is similar to studies of BIR in yeast, where template switching was observed in only 20% of cases (Smith et al. 2007). Unlike other studies that have reported large interspersed duplications and deletions (Lee et al. 2007; Vissers et al. 2007), the complex rearrangements we detected were <2 kb in length and directly adjacent to the breakpoint. Although it is possible that the interspersed copy number changes observed by other groups could occur by "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gene fusions involving members of the RAF family of protein kinases have recently been identified as characteristic aberrations of low-grade astrocytomas, the most common tumors of the central nervous system in children. While it has been shown that these fusions cause constitutive activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway, very little is known about their formation. Here, we present a detailed analysis of RAF gene fusion breakpoints from a well-characterized cohort of 43 low-grade astrocytomas. Our findings show that the rearrangements that generate these RAF gene fusions may be simple or complex and that both inserted nucleotides and microhomology are common at the DNA breakpoints. Furthermore, we identify novel enrichment of microhomologous sequences in the regions immediately flanking the breakpoints. We thus provide evidence that the tandem duplications responsible for these fusions are generated by microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR). Although MMBIR has previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of other diseases and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes, we demonstrate here that the proposed details of MMBIR are consistent with a recurrent rearrangement in cancer. Our analysis of repetitive elements, Z-DNA and sequence motifs in the fusion partners identified significant enrichment of the human minisatellite conserved sequence/χ-like element at one side of the breakpoint. Therefore, in addition to furthering our understanding of low-grade astrocytomas, this study provides insights into the molecular mechanistic details of MMBIR and the sequence of events that occur in the formation of genomic rearrangements.
    Genome Research 03/2011; 21(4):505-14. DOI:10.1101/gr.115782.110 · 14.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "LIS1 has been identified as the specific gene responsible for the classical brain and facial abnormalities of MDLS, but other genes in the region are thought to contribute to associated features often observed in the syndrome, including somatic growth retardation. Also of interest is the study by Vissers et al. (2007), who recently reported a number of complex chromosomal rearrangements in proximal 17p (including the suggestive QTL at 17p13.2 reported here for the midchildhood growth spurt) in patients with several development abnormalities, including significantly reduced growth. Thus it is possible that the proximal region of chromosome 17p contains as yet unidentified genes that might influence features of normal growth such as the midchildhood growth spurt. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Growth is a complex process composed of distinct phases over the course of childhood. Although the pubertal growth spurt has received the most attention from auxologists and pediatricians, the midchildhood growth spurt has been less well studied. The midchildhood growth spurt refers to a relatively small increase in growth velocity observed in some, but not necessarily all, children in early to middle childhood. If present, the midchildhood growth spurt typically occurs sometime between the ages of 4 and 8 years, well before the onset of the far more pronounced pubertal growth spurt. In this study we used a triple logistic curve-fitting method to fit individual growth curves to serial stature data from 579 healthy participants in the Fels Longitudinal Study, 479 of whom have been genotyped for about 400 short tandem repeat (STR) markers spanning the genome. We categorized individuals according to the presence or absence of a midchildhood growth spurt and then conducted heritability and genome-wide linkage analyses on the dichotomous trait. In the total sample of 579 individuals, 336 (58%) were found to have evidence of having had a midchildhood growth spurt. There was a marked sex difference in presence of the midchildhood growth spurt, however, with 232 of the 293 males (79%) having had a midchildhood growth spurt but just 104 of the 286 females (36%) having had one. Presence of a midchildhood growth spurt was found to have a significant heritability of 0.37 +/- 0.14 (p = 0.003). Two quantitative trait loci with suggestive LOD scores were found: one at 12 cM on chromosome 17p13.2 (LOD = 2.13) between markers D17S831 and D17S938 and one at 85 cM on chromosome 12q14 (LOD = 2.06) between markers D12S83 and D12S326.
    Human Biology 01/2009; 80(6):623-36. DOI:10.1353/hub.0.0037 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The FoSTeS model is currently the only major rearrangement mechanism that could explain these complex rearrangements. Furthermore, some complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) unveiled by recent cytogenetic data can also be explained by FoSTeS [84]. Intriguingly, some tandem duplications in the PLP1 and LMNB region [77,79] which were previously explained by a model combining HR and NHEJ, especially those with microhomology at the junction [77,79], can be more parsimoniously explained by the FoSTeS model including the strand switching template only once (FoSTeS × 1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genomic rearrangements describe gross DNA changes of the size ranging from a couple of hundred base pairs, the size of an average exon, to megabases (Mb). When greater than 3 to 5 Mb, such changes are usually visible microscopically by chromosome studies. Human diseases that result from genomic rearrangements have been called genomic disorders. Three major mechanisms have been proposed for genomic rearrangements in the human genome. Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is mostly mediated by low-copy repeats (LCRs) with recombination hotspots, gene conversion and apparent minimal efficient processing segments. NAHR accounts for most of the recurrent rearrangements: those that share a common size, show clustering of breakpoints, and recur in multiple individuals. Non-recurrent rearrangements are of different sizes in each patient, but may share a smallest region of overlap whose change in copy number may result in shared clinical features among different patients. LCRs do not mediate, but may stimulate non-recurrent events. Some rare NAHRs can also be mediated by highly homologous repetitive sequences (for example, Alu, LINE); these NAHRs account for some of the non-recurrent rearrangements. Other non-recurrent rearrangements can be explained by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and the Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS) models. These mechanisms occur both in germ cells, where the rearrangements can be associated with genomic disorders, and in somatic cells in which such genomic rearrangements can cause disorders such as cancer. NAHR, NHEJ and FoSTeS probably account for the majority of genomic rearrangements in our genome and the frequency distribution of the three at a given locus may partially reflect the genomic architecture in proximity to that locus. We provide a review of the current understanding of these three models.
    PathoGenetics 02/2008; 1(1):4. DOI:10.1186/1755-8417-1-4
Show more