Article

Lymphohistiocytoid variant of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a series of 22 cases.

Mesopath Group, ERI 3 Inserm, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
American Journal of Surgical Pathology (Impact Factor: 4.59). 06/2007; 31(5):711-6. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31802baad7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The lymphohistiocytoid variant of diffuse malignant mesothelioma is rare with very few cases described in the literature. It is characterized by mesothelial cells with a histiocytelike appearance and an associated dense lymphoid infiltrate. We studied clinicopathologic features and immunohistochemical patterns of a series of 22 cases. The histiocytelike cells had a mesothelial immunophenotype: AE1/AE3 (100%), calretinin (100%), CK5/6 (46%), and EMA (52%). The prominent lymphoid component showed a cytotoxic T-cell immunophenotype. Prognosis was similar to that of a large series of epithelioid diffuse malignant mesotheliomas. Formely, it was classified within the sarcomatoid type. We suggest that it should be reclassified as an epithelioid variant because of its similar behavioural characteristics. There was no evidence of Epstein-Barr virus-related infection.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
89 Views
  • Annales de Pathologie 06/2007; 27(3):212–218. DOI:10.1016/S0242-6498(07)91855-6 · 0.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mesothelioma is a rare disease less than 0.3% of cancers in France, very aggressive and resistant to the majority of conventional therapies. Asbestos exposure is nearly the only recognized cause of mesothelioma in men observed in 80% of case. In 1990, the projections based on mortality predicted a raise of incidence in mesothelioma for the next three decades. Nowadays, the diagnosis of this cancer is based on pathology, but the histological presentation frequently heterogeneous, is responsible for numerous pitfalls and major problems of early detection toward effective therapy. Facing such a diagnostic, epidemiological and medico-legal context, a national and international multidisciplinary network has been progressively set up in order to answer to epidemiological survey, translational or academic research questions. Moreover, in response to the action of the French Cancer Program (action 23.1) a network of pathologists was organized for expert pathological second opinion using a standardized procedure of certification for mesothelioma diagnosis. We describe the network organization and show the results during this last 15years period of time from 1998-2013. These results show the major impact on patient's management, and confirm the interest of this second opinion to provide accuracy of epidemiological data, quality of medico-legal acknowledgement and accuracy of clinical diagnostic for the benefit of patients. We also show the impact of these collaborative efforts for creating a high quality clinicobiological, epidemiological and therapeutic data collection for improvement of the knowledge of this dramatic disease.
    Annales de Pathologie 02/2014; 34(1):51-63. DOI:10.1016/j.annpat.2014.01.009 · 0.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma (DPM) forms a spectrum of indolent surface tumours to malignant invasive cancers. There are few pathological series that span well and poorly differentiated lesions that show diffuse peritoneal spread. Sixty-four DPM treated by initial cytoreductive therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Tumours were classified by surface and invasive growth pattern and correlated with risk factors, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction (CCR). Degree of invasion was quantitated as absent (0), into stroma (I), into fat (II), and into adjacent structures (III) and was correlated with cytological features. Selected immunohistochemical stains were performed. There were three well differentiated papillary mesotheliomas (WDPM; type A), four multicystic mesothelioma (type B), 22 tubulopapillary epithelioid mesotheliomas (type C), and 35 poorly differentiated epithelioid mesotheliomas with solid or sarcomatoid growth (Type D). Seven type D tumours had prominent sarcomatoid areas, 12 deciduoid areas, and four lymphohistiocytoid features. Risk factors were present in all groups except type A, and included prior abdominal surgery (n = 24), asbestos exposure (n = 5) and radiation (n = 2). Extra-pleural mesothelioma was present in all groups except type B (total n = 7, 11%). Two type A and eight type C tumours lacked invasion; only type D showed level III invasion. The invasive portion of one type A tumour and two type B tumours showed adenomatoid features. PCI and CCR were greater in type D compared to the other groups (p = 0.02), as well as mitotic rate, degree of necrosis, and nuclear pleomorphism (p < 0.001). Degree of invasion was strongly correlated with CCR (p = 0.007), necrosis (p < 0.0001), nuclear grade (p < 0.0001), and mitotic rate (p = 0.001), but not PCI (p = 0.1). Immunohistochemical results were similar across groups, with frequent positivity for CA125 (94%), EGFR (94%) and calretinin (93%), followed by p16 (85%), cytokeratin 5,6 (76%), D2-40 (71%) and WT-1 (47%). PAX-8 was negative in all tumours, except one type A tumour that showed diffuse nuclear positivity. Diffuse peritoneal mesotheliomas can be classified into four groups that reflect invasive potential, degree of adverse histological features, and amenability for CCR. Non-invasive tumours include both type A and type C tumours.
    Pathology 07/2013; 45(5). DOI:10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283631cce · 2.62 Impact Factor