Article

Symptom burden in persons with spinal cord injury

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Impact Factor: 2.44). 06/2007; 88(5):638-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.002
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine (1) the frequency, severity, and reported course of 7 symptoms in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and (2) the association between these symptoms and patient functioning.
Postal survey.
Community.
A survey that included measures of the frequency, severity, and recalled course of pain, fatigue, numbness, weakness, shortness of breath, vision loss, and memory loss, as well as a measure of community integration and psychologic functioning was mailed to a sample of persons with SCI. One hundred forty-seven usable surveys were returned (response rate, 43% of surveys mailed).
The frequency and average severity of each symptom was computed, and the frequencies of each type of reported course were noted. Analyses estimated the associations among the symptoms, and between symptom severity and measures of patient functioning.
The most common symptoms were pain, weakness, fatigue, and numbness. All symptoms were reported to remain the same or to get worse more often than they were reported to improve once they began. Pain, weakness, fatigue, and memory loss were the symptoms most closely associated with patient functioning.
Patients with SCI must deal with a number of secondary complications in addition to any disability caused by the injury itself. Of 7 symptoms studied, pain, weakness, and fatigue appeared to be most common and most closely linked to patient social and mental health functioning. Research is needed to identify the causal relationships between perceived symptoms and quality of life in patients with SCI and to identify effective treatments for those symptoms shown to impact patient functioning.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mark P Jensen, Mar 05, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
87 Views
  • Source
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 10/2012; 93(10):e30. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.093 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To systematically identify factors associated with participation in social and community activities for adult wheelchair users (WCUs). Data sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMBASE. Study selection: Quantitative and qualitative peer-reviewed publications were included, which were written in English, reported original research and investigated factors associated with social and community participation in adult WCUs. Data extraction: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. Factors were organized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Data synthesis: Thirty-five studies were selected: two of power WCUs, 10 of manual WCUs and 23 of both. Six qualitative studies, ranging in quality from 8/10 to 9/10 and 29 quantitative studies were included, ranging in quality from 4/15 to 11/15. Fifteen body function, 4 activity, 5 participation, 15 environmental and 14 personal factors were found to be associated with social and community participation. Conclusions: Social and community participation of WCUs is associated with factors from all ICF domains. Wheelchair factors, accessibility, skills with wheelchair use, pain, finances and education are modifiable factors frequently reported to be associated with participation. Experimental research focusing on modifiable factors is needed to further our understanding of factors influencing participation among WCUs. Implications for Rehabilitation Wheelchair factors, including comfort and durability, are associated with participation and may be targeted in clinical intervention. Wheelchair skills are clinically modifiable and have been shown to improve participation in manual wheelchair users. Body functions (e.g. confidence, depression and fatigue) and personal factors (e.g. finances and level of education) may be considered for clinical intervention.
    Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology 12/2014; DOI:10.3109/17483107.2014.989420
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. To highlight research priorities of people with spinal cord injury (SCI), outline the current state of rehabilitation research and suggest potentially fruitful avenues for future inquiry. Method. Commentary. Results. People with SCI identify pain, depression, fatigue, pressure sores, spasticity and the management of bladder and bowel as research priorities. Research reveals multiple interconnections between these secondary problems, all of which negatively impact quality of life (QOL). However, despite a substantial volume of existing research, significant gaps in knowledge remain, duplications of research effort are apparent and few interventions have an adequate evidence base. Issues concerning community participation - another research priority - have only recently attracted researchers' attention. Conclusions. This commentary contends that research should: focus on issues and outcomes of relevance and importance to people living with SCI; address the complexities of secondary conditions and their inter-relationships; appraise environmental barriers to participation in meaningful living; be designed to identify and inform effective and relevant interventions. Innovative approaches to research partnerships, mixed methods and exploring variables usually omitted from quantitative studies might enhance the likelihood that the complexity of issues facing people living with SCI will be identified and addressed. Moreover, a governing focus on achieving lives experienced as hopeful, purposeful, satisfying and meaningful could contribute to enhancing QOL outcomes following SCI.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 01/2010; 32(14):1209-18. DOI:10.3109/09638280903420325 · 1.84 Impact Factor