Surgery in malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
ABSTRACT Because of their rarity and indolent nature, optimal management of malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to review a series of patients with these tumors and investigate the role of surgery in the treatment.
A retrospective study of 73 patients (ages 24-86 years; 36 women) undergoing treatment at a tertiary academic medical center was performed. Patient demographics, diagnostic tests, operations, pathologic findings, adjuvant treatments, and survival were reviewed.
Seventy-four percent of patients had advanced disease with hepatic metastases and 30% had functional tumors. Fifty-seven percent of the patients underwent pancreatic resections. Two 60-day mortalities occurred and the postoperative complication rate was 27%. Overall 5-year survival rate was 44%. There was no difference in survival between patients with functional and nonfunctional tumors. Patients undergoing resection, even in metastatic disease, had better survival than patients who had no resection (60% vs. 30%, P = 0.025). Recurrence occurred in 20% of patients who underwent a curative resection.
Patients with malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors commonly present with advanced disease. Although, curative resection is not frequent, survival benefit may be obtainable with aggressive surgical management even in the face of metastatic disease.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: How to properly manage neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) remains debatable, and only limited clinical data have been published from Asian population. The objective of this study is to identify possible prognostic factors affecting overall survival time and to provide a guideline for future clinical practice.A retrospective study was performed on 1286 patients who had neuroendocrine tumors in our specialized center, and data from 130 patients who had NELM were summarized. Demographic and clinicopathologic data, tumor grade, treatment method, and prognosis were statistically analyzed.Most of the NELMs originated from pancreas (65.4%). Important prognostic factors that included tumor location and size were identified with multivariate analysis. Patients with either primary tumor resection or liver metastasis resection showed a 5-year survival of 35.7% or 33.3%, respectively, whereas resection of both resulted in a 50% 5-year survival. More importantly, resection was performed on 7 patients with grade 3 (G3) tumors, and resulted in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival of 100%, 42.8%, and 28.6%, respectively, whereas the other 9 G3 patients without resection died within 3 years. P = 0.49 comparing the resected group with nonresected group in G3 patients. Besides, the overall 5-year survival rates for resected and nonresected patients were 40.5% and 5.4%, respectively.Multiple prognostic factors influenced the overall outcome of NELM including patient age, tumor location, and size, etc. Aggressive surgical approaches could be considered for maximum survival time disregarding the pathological grade of the tumor. Study with larger sample size should be considered to reevaluate the recommendation of the WHO guidelines for G3 neuroendocrine tumors.Medicine 01/2015; 94(2):e388. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000000388 · 4.87 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background The role of extended resections in the management of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is not well defined. Methods Between 1995 and 2012, 134 patients with PNET underwent isolated (isoPNET group: 91 patients) or extended pancreatic resection (synchronous liver metastases and/or adjacent organs) (advPNET group: 43 patients). Results The associated resections included 27 hepatectomies, 9 vascular resections, 12 colectomies, 10 gastrectomies, 4 nephrectomies, 4 adrenalectomies, and 3 duodenojejunal resections. R0 was achieved in 41 patients (95 %) in the advPNET. The rates of T3-T4 (73 vs 16 %; p p = .007) were higher in the advPNET group. Mortality (5 vs 2 %) and major morbidity (21 vs 19 %) rates were similar between the 2 groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the series was 87 % in the isoPNET group and 66 % in the advPNET group (p = .006). Only patients with both locally advanced disease and liver metastases showed worse survival (p = .0003). The advPNET group developed recurrence earlier [disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years: 26 vs 81 %; p p p = .011), NE carcinoma (p p = .013). The multivariate analysis did not highlight any factor that influenced OS. In multivariate analysis independent DFS factors were a poor degree of differentiation (p = .03) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society stage (p = .01). Conclusions An aggressive surgical approach for locally advanced or metastatic tumors is safe and offers long-term survival.Annals of Surgical Oncology 09/2014; 22(3). DOI:10.1245/s10434-014-4016-8 · 3.94 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) share a unique genetic identity, functional behavior, and clinical course. Compared with tumors of the exocrine pancreas, they are rare and show a different biologic behavior and prognosis. On the basis of data from recent studies, all PNETs, outside of small insulinomas, should be considered potentially malignant and treated accordingly. Untreated tumors have a high possibility to grow locally into adjacent structures or spread to distant organs. Although surgical excision irrespective of tumor functioning or nonfunctioning state remains the cornerstone of therapy, providing the best disease-free and survival rates to date, the understanding of the genetic nature of the disease yields new 'targets' to consider in drug development. The aim of this review is to summarize all recent advances of genetic research and new drug development in terms of PNETs, especially their genetic identity and subsequent alterations leading to the development of near or total malignant activity, and the new medical treatment strategies of this potentially curable disease on the basis of therapeutical agents acting, where possible, at the genetic level.European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 08/2014; 26(8):826-35. DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000138 · 2.15 Impact Factor