Article

T-cell responses to islet antigens improves detection of autoimmune diabetes and identifies patients with more severe beta-cell lesions in phenotypic type 2 diabetes

Department of Medicine , University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States
Diabetes (Impact Factor: 8.47). 09/2007; 56(8):2110-5. DOI: 10.2337/db06-0552
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults or type 1.5 diabetes is considered to be a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. However, identification of patients is based commonly on autoantibody (Ab) detection. To determine whether measuring T-cell reactivity to islet proteins compared with measuring Abs improves detection of autoimmune diabetes and how beta-cell function correlates with T-cell reactivity compared with Ab positivity, we assessed the T-cell proliferative responses and Ab responses (islet cell autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies, insulinoma-associated protein-2 autoantibodies, and GAD Abs) to islet proteins of 36 phenotypic type 2 diabetic patients. To be considered Ab(+) or T-cell(+), patients were required to be positive for a minimum of two consecutive time points. beta-Cell function was measured with fasting and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide. Independent of T-cell reactivity, Ab(+) and Ab(-) patients had comparable fasting and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide. Independent of Ab status, T-cell(+) patients demonstrated significantly lower glucagon-stimulated (P < 0.003) C-peptide compared with T-cell(-) patients. These data suggest that measuring T-cell responses to multiple islet proteins in phenotypic type 2 diabetic patients improves identification of patients with autoimmune diabetes and delineates those who have a more severe beta-cell lesion compared with Ab assessment alone.

0 Followers
 · 
40 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction Diabetes mellitus is mainly subdivided into type 1 diabetes (DM1) or type 2 (DM2). The existence of genetic, metabolic and immunological mechanisms involving these two entities, and clinical evidence of an autoimmune form of diabetes diagnosed in adults (LADA), suggests the possibility of a pathophysiological continuity. Objective To describe the main genetic, immunological and metabolic mechanisms common to the development of DM1 and DM2. To support the hypothesis of a pathophysiological continuum between the two main subtypes of diabetes. Methods Systematic search in PubMed database of the original articles or systematic reviews published until April 2013. The search terms used were: «type 1 diabetes mellitus», «type 2 diabetes mellitus», «latent auto-immune diabetes in adults», «pathophysiology». Conclusions LADA assumes, under the pathophysiological point of view, an intermediate position between DM1 and DM2, sharing genetic and immunological mechanisms. It was found that self-reactivity and apoptosis of the β cell are not exclusive processes of DM1, and that insulin resistance, being a key factor in the pathogenesis of DM2, determines a more rapid progression of DM1. Phenotypic expression of diabetes results from the imbalance created between these pathophysiological mechanisms, along the course of the disease. More than the classification of the patient in a subtype of diabetes it is the recognition of mechanisms leading to metabolic changes that allows an adequate therapy. The definition of LADA as an isolated entity could be withdrawn.
    01/2013; 8(1):44–49. DOI:10.1016/j.rpedm.2013.05.002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, type 2 diabetes (T2D) was considered a metabolic disease of ageing. However, recent discoveries have demonstrated the role of chronic systemic inflammation in the development of insulin resistance and subsequent progression to T2D. Over the years, investigations into the pathophysiology of T2D have identified the presence of islet‐specific T cells and islet autoimmune disease in T2D patients. Moreover, the cell‐mediated islet autoimmunity has also been correlated with the progressive loss of β‐cell function associated with T2D disease pathogenesis. In this manuscript, the involvement of cell‐mediated islet autoimmune disease in the progression of T2D disease and the similarities in islet‐specific T‐cell reactivity between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and T2D are discussed.
    Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism 09/2013; 15. DOI:10.1111/dom.12167 · 5.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cross-sectional studies have suggested that Islet autoimmunity may be more prevalent in type 2 diabetes (T2D) than previously appreciated and may contribute to the progressive decline in β-cell function. In this study, we longitudinally evaluated the effect of islet autoimmune development on the progressive β-cell dysfunction in T2D patients.
    Diabetes Care 09/2014; 37(12). DOI:10.2337/dc14-0961 · 8.57 Impact Factor