Prevalence and correlates of lifetime suicidal ideation and attempts among Latino subground in the United States

Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance/Harvard Medical School, Somerville, Mass. 02143, USA.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.14). 05/2007; 68(4):572-81. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v68n0413
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Limited data are available to understand the prevalence and correlates of suicidal behavior among U.S. Latino subgroups. This article compares the prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among major U.S. Latino ethnic subgroups and identifies psycho-sociocultural factors associated with suicidal behaviors.
The National Latino and Asian American Study includes Spanish- and English-speaking Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans, and other Latinos. A total of 2554 interviews were conducted in both English and Spanish by trained interviewers between May 2002 and November 2003. Lifetime psychiatric disorders were measured using the World Health Organization-Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Descriptive statistics and logistic models were used to determine demographic, clinical, cultural, and social correlates of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.
The lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Latinos was 10.1% and 4.4%, respectively. Puerto Ricans were more likely to report ideation as compared with other Latino subgroups, but this difference was eliminated after adjustments for demographic, psychiatric, and sociocultural factors. Most lifetime suicide attempts described by Latinos were reported as occurring when they were under the age of 18 years. Any lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses, including dual diagnoses, were associated with an increased risk of lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Latinos. In addition, female gender, acculturation (born in the United States and English speaking), and high levels of family conflict were independently and positively correlated with suicide attempts among Latinos, even among those without any psychiatric disorder.
These findings reinforce the importance of understanding the process of acculturation, the role of family, and the sociocultural context for suicide risk among Latinos. These should be considered in addition to psychiatric diagnoses and symptoms in Latino suicide research, treatment, and prevention, especially among young individuals.

Download full-text


Available from: William Sribney, Aug 01, 2015
  • Source
    • "Please cite this article as: Polanco-Roman, L., et al., Ethnic differences in prevalence and correlates of self-harm behaviors in a treatment-seeking sample of emerging adults. Psychiatry Research (2014), et al., 2006; Fortuna et al., 2007). More research is thus needed to resolve these inconsistencies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study examined differences between White and ethnic minority emerging adults in the prevalence of self-harm behaviors – i.e., non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts (SA) – and in well-documented risk (i.e., depressive symptoms, generalized anxiety symptoms, social anxiety symptoms, suicidal ideation (SI), substance use) and protective factors (i.e., religiosity/spirituality, family support, friend support) associated with NSSI and SAs. Emerging adults (N=1,156; 56% ethnic minority), ages 17–29 (M=22.3, SD=3.0), who presented at a counseling center at a public university in the Northeastern U.S. completed a clinical interview and self-report symptom measures. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the association between risk and protective factors in predicting history of NSSI-only, any SA, and no self-harm separately among White and ethnic minority individuals. Ethnic differences emerged in the prevalence and correlates of NSSI and SAs. Social anxiety was associated with SAs among White individuals but with NSSI among ethnic minority individuals. Substance use was a more relevant risk factor for White individuals, and friend support was a more relevant protective factor for ethnic minority individuals. These findings suggest differing vulnerabilities to NSSI and SAs between White and ethnic minority emerging adults.
    Psychiatry Research 10/2014; 220(2014):927-934. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.09.017 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "As such, medical and other care providers should be better informed about these patterns to meet fast growing Latina health care needs, and to address prevention strategies for reducing costs for related medical and psychological consequences. This study advances the literature on Latina mental health disparities (Ai et al., 2012; Pilver et al., 2011) by identifying psychosocial risk and protective factors for their likelihood of being diagnosed with MDD and GAD, and especially for experiencing SI, adjusting for known sociodemographic and cultural predictors of these outcomes (e.g., employment, discrimination; Alegr ıa et al., 2008; Fortuna et al., 2007; Gavin et al., 2010; Pilver et al., 2011). In particular, factors associated with family dynamics strongly predict GAD and SI, but not MDD. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a rapidly growing Latina/o American population, little is known about modifiable factors that could protect Latinas against major psychiatric disorders. The present study explored psychosocial risk (Negative Interaction) and protective factors (Family Cohesion, Social Support, Religious Involvement, Racial and Ethnic Identity) for major depressive disorder (MDD), general anxiety disorder (GAD), and suicidal ideation (SI) among Latinas participating in the first national mental health epidemiological survey of Latina Americans. We conducted three sets of logistic regressions, predicting outcomes for 1,427 Latinas identified in the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS), the first nationally representative, epidemiological study of Latino and Asian Americans living in the United States. These analyses followed preplanned steps: Model 1 used known predictors as controls and Model 2 added psychosocial risk and predictive factors beyond the known predictors. For each outcome examined, psychosocial risk and protective factors produced a significantly better model fit in Model 2 than sociodemographic and acculturation variables known to predict mental health outcomes in Model 1. Negative Interactions were associated with increased likelihood of GAD and SI, whereas Family Cohesion seemed to be protective against GAD. No psychosocial factors predicted MDD. Differential protective and risk factors for major psychiatric disorders suggest that assessment and intervention may need certain sex-specific components in order to improve health care and prevention for Latinas.
    Women s Health Issues 03/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.008 · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "If the participant responded " 1 or more times " to answer either question, the item was coded as Yes. These measurements have been successfully administered in previous studies using data from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS), the first national epidemiological survey of Asian Americans in the United States (Cochran, Mays, Alegria, Ortega, & Takeuchi, 2007; Duldulao et al., 2009; Fortuna, Perez, Canino, Sribney, & Alegria, 2007 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigates the association between drug use and lifetime suicidal behaviors among Asian American women (n = 720) residing throughout Massachusetts, using data collected from 2010 to 2011. Logistic regression models identified that a history of hard drug use alone or in combination with soft drug use has a significant association with both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Asian American women, adjusting for demographic covariates, history of psychiatric diagnosis, and family communication. These findings highlight the importance of addressing hard drug use when designing suicide prevention programs for Asian American women.
    Substance Use &amp Misuse 07/2013; DOI:10.3109/10826084.2013.808219 · 1.23 Impact Factor
Show more