Motivation before meaning: motivational information encoded in meerkat alarm calls develops earlier than referential information.

Verhaltensbiologie, Zoologisches Institut, Universitat Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
The American Naturalist (Impact Factor: 4.55). 07/2007; 169(6):758-67. DOI: 10.1086/516719
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In contrast to historical assumptions about the affective nature of animal vocalizations, it is now clear that many vertebrates are capable of producing specific alarm calls in response to different predators, calls that provide information that goes beyond the motivational state of a caller. However, although these calls function referentially, it does not mean that they are devoid of motivational content. Studies on meerkats (Suricata suricatta) directly support this conclusion. The acoustic structure of their alarm calls simultaneously encodes information that is both motivational (level of urgency) and referential (predator specific). In this study, we investigated whether alarm calls of young meerkats undergo developmental modification and whether the motivational or the referential aspect of calls changes more over time. We found that, based on their acoustic structure, calls of young showed a high correct assignment to low- and high-urgency contexts but, in contrast to adults, low assignment to specific predator types. However, the discrimination among predator types was better in high-urgency than in low-urgency contexts. Our results suggest that acoustic features related to level of urgency are expressed earlier than those related to predator-specific information and may support the idea that referential calls evolve from motivational signals.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: By including a focus on multimedia interactions linked to transcripts, corpus linguistics can vastly expand its horizons. This expansion will rely on two continuing developments. First, we need to develop easily used methods for each of the ten analytic methods we have examined, including lexical analyses, QDA (qualitative data analysis), automatic tagging, language profiles, group comparisons, change scores, error analysis, feedback studies, conversation analysis, and modeling. Second, we need to work together to construct a unified database for language studies and related sciences. This database must be grounded on the principles of open access, data-sharing, interoperability, and integrated structure. It must provide powerful tools for searching, multilinguality, and multimedia analysis. If we can build this infrastructure, we will be able to explore more deeply the key questions underlying the structure and functioning of language, as it emerges from the intermeshing of processes operative on eight major timeframes.
    Language and Computers. 11/2011;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: What motivates some members of a social group to voluntarily incur costs in order to provide for the common good? This question lies at the heart of theoretical and empirical studies of cooperative behavior. This is also the question that underlies the classic volunteer’s dilemma model, which has been previously explored in scenarios where group members are related or interact asymmetrically. Here we present a model that combines asymmetry and relatedness, showing that the probability of volunteerism in such systems depends closely on both the degree of asymmetry and level of relatedness between interacting individuals. As has been shown in previous volunteer’s dilemma models, the payoff ratio and overall group size also influence the probability of volunteerism. The probability of volunteerism decreases with increasing group size or decreasing cost-to-benefit ratio of the co-players; in the presence of asymmetrical interactions, subordinate players were more likely to offer public goods than the dominant player. More asymmetrical interactions decrease the probability of volunteerism of the dominant player; overall volunteerism increases with increasing relatedness.
    Chinese Science Bulletin 57(16). · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A long-standing question in animal communication is whether signals reveal intrinsic properties of the signaller or extrinsic properties of its environment. Alarm calls, one of the most conspicuous components of antipredator behaviour, intuitively would appear to reflect internal states of the signaller. Pioneering research in primates and fowl, however, dem-onstrated that signallers may produce unique alarm calls during encoun-ters with different types of predators, suggesting that signallers through selective production of alarm calls provide to conspecific receivers infor-mation about predators in the environment. In this article, we review evi-dence for such 'functional reference' in the alarm calls of birds based on explicit tests of two criteria proposed in Macedonia & Evans' (Ethology 93, 1993, 177) influential conceptual framework: (1) that unique alarm calls are given to specific predator categories, and (2) that alarm calls iso-lated from contextual information elicit antipredator responses from receivers similar to those produced during actual predator encounters. Despite the importance of research on birds in development of the con-ceptual framework and the ubiquity of alarm calls in birds, evidence for functionally referential alarm calls in this clade is limited to six species. In these species, alarm calls are associated with the type of predator encoun-tered as well as variation in hunting behaviour; with defence of reproduc-tive effort in addition to predators of adults; with age-related changes in predation risk; and with strong fitness benefits. Our review likely under-estimates the occurrence of functional reference in avian alarm calls, as incomplete application and testing of the conceptual framework has lim-ited our understanding. Throughout, therefore, we suggest avian taxa for future studies, as well as additional questions and experimental approaches that would strengthen our understanding of the meaning of functional reference in avian alarm calls. A central question in animal communication is what signals mean to the individuals producing them and to those receiving them. Two traditional views suggest that signals reflect either the affective or emotional state of the signaller, or its probable (immediate) future behaviour (Smith 1977; Marler et al. 1992), with addi-tional signal meaning dependent upon the contextual cues surrounding vocal production. Rather than reflecting the signaller's internal state, vocalizations
    Ethology 01/2013; 119:449-461. · 1.95 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014