Article

Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry.

Rheumatology and Physical Rehabilitation Department, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Journal of Clinical Densitometry (Impact Factor: 1.71). 01/2007; 10(2):153-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.12.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Diagnostic discordance for osteoporosis is the observation that the T-score of a patient varies between skeletal sites, falling into 2 different diagnostic categories identified by the World Health Organization classification system. Densitometrists and clinicians should expect that at least 4 of every 10 patients tested by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to demonstrate T-score discordance between spine and total hip measurement sites. T-score discordance can occur for a variety of reasons related to physiologic and pathologic patient factors and the performance or analysis of DXA itself.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
158 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This analysis examines lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) of US adults from NHANES 2005-2008 by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Prevalence of low spine BMD and agreement between the prevalence of low BMD at the spine and femur neck in older adults are also assessed. Lumbar spine BMD data from a representative sample of the US population have not been previously available. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008 to examine demographic patterns in lumbar spine BMD among US adults age ≥20 years and the prevalence of low lumbar spine BMD in adults age ≥50 years. Agreement between the prevalence of low BMD at the femur neck and spine in older adults was also assessed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure lumbar spine and femur neck BMD. World Health Organization definitions were used to categorize skeletal status as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis. Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had higher and Mexican Americans had lower lumbar spine BMD. Lumbar spine BMD declined with age in women, but not in men. Approximately 4.7 million (10%) older US women and 1 million (3%) older men had lumbar spine osteoporosis in 2005-2008. Roughly one third of them differed in skeletal status at the spine and hip but most were normal at one site and osteopenic at the other. Only 3-10%, depending on sex, had osteoporosis at one skeletal site but not at the other skeletal site. Between 76% and 87% with discordant skeletal status had lumbar spine T-scores within 1 unit of the category threshold. These findings suggest that measuring either the femur neck or the lumbar spine will correctly classify the majority of individuals who present for care as osteoporotic or not.
    Osteoporosis International 07/2011; 23(4):1351-60. · 4.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Thalassemia major (TM) is a hereditary disease causing chronic anemia, increased ineffective erythropoiesis, and expansion of bone marrow cavities, which ultimately causes osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to mathematically model segmental and total bone mineral density (BMD) in Egyptian patients with TM on bases of sex, age, height, and weight. Methods: Fifty patients with TM (25 m and 25 f; age range: 16–40 yr) undergoing regular blood transfusions and 50 sex– and age–matched healthy controls volunteered in the study protocol. BMD was determined by dual–energy X–ray absorptiometry. Serum calcium, ionized calcium, inorganic phosphate, bone–specific alkaline phosphatase, and ferritin levels were monitored for all participants. Results: TM patients were generally short and underweight with a mean (±SD) BMD total Z–score of –1.49±1.12. The average pelvis, lumbar spine, and total BMD values for TM patients and healthy controls were: 0.88±0.12 vs. 1.16±0.15, 0.97±0.12 vs. 1.13±0.14, and 0.93±0.09 vs. 1.18±0.11 g/cm2, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the formulae derived for predicting pelvis, lumbar spine, and total BMD for TM patients on bases of sex, age, height, and weight had significant cumulative correlation coefficients (R=0.89, 0.81, 0.90, respectively; P<0.0001 for all associations). Conclusions: The mathematical formulae based on sex, age, height, and weight were capable of predicting pelvis, lumbar spine, and total BMD for TM patients, which represents a practical clinical tool for frequently monitoring BMD status of these patients.
    Int. J. Body Comp. Res. 06/2009; 7(2):49-55.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density (BMD), and the impact of this difference on osteoporosis diagnosis, we measured bilateral proximal femora using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 3481 subjects (608 males, 2873 females). The difference between left and right hip was considered significant if it exceeded the smallest detectable difference (SDD) for any of the three hip subregions. Contralateral femoral BMD was highly correlated at all measuring sites (r = 0.92-0.95). However, significant left-right differences in BMD were common: the difference exceeded the SDD for 54% of patients at total hip, 52.1% at femoral neck, and 57.7% at trochanter. The prevalence of left-right differences was greater in participants >65 years. For 1169 participants with normal spines, 22 (1.9%) had discordant left-right hips in which one hip was osteoporotic; for 1349 patients with osteopenic spines, 94 (7%) had osteoporosis in one hip. Participants with BMI < 20 kg/m(2) were more likely to show major T-score discordance (osteoporosis in one hip and normal BMD in the other). Multiple regression analysis showed that the only significant statically parameter that persists after adjusting for all potential confounding parameters were age over 65 years.
    ISRN rheumatology. 01/2012; 2012:617535.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
47 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014