Article

Total percutaneous endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using Perclose ProGlide closure devices.

Division of Vascular Surgery, VA Western NY Healthcare System, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York 14215, USA.
Journal of Endovascular Therapy (Impact Factor: 2.7). 05/2007; 14(2):184-8. DOI: 10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14[184:TPEROA]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe a technique for access site closure in percutaneous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair using double Perclose ProGlide devices to overcome the problems associated with the bulky delivery system and braided suture of the antecedent (Prostar) device.
After obtaining guidewire access, 2 Perclose ProGlide sutures are deployed at 90 degrees to each other. The appropriate sheaths are placed over the stiff guidewires. After the stent-graft procedure is completed, an assistant holds pressure while the knots are tightened with the stiff guidewire still in the artery. Once the second knot is tightened with the knot pusher and after confirming adequate hemostasis, the wire is removed, pressure is applied, and heparin reversed. This method has been used in 17 consecutive patients (age range 65-85 years) undergoing endovascular AAA repair. One patient needed patch angioplasty and 2 required small incisions for additional suture placements (81% primary success rate for total percutaneous repair, 90% success rate for all sites).
We have found the double Perclose ProGlide technique to be easy to use, safe, and feasible for total percutaneous AAA repair. More experience with longer follow-up is needed to assess its potential to replace the Perclose Prostar closure device for total percutaneous AAA repairs.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
84 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The "Preclose technique" using a perclose device has recently become widely used in various percutaneous procedures requiring a large access sheath. However, the post-procedural application of the perclose™ to the large sheath arteriotomy is more challenging because of the risk of bleeding and difficulty of device application. This report introduces a novel post-procedural closing technique of large 22 French arterial sheath access using perclose devices. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 09/2013; · 2.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose : To evaluate in a large patient cohort the 6-F Perclose ProGlide in conjunction with the preclose technique to seal puncture sites after percutaneous endovascular aortic repairs. Methods : The medical records were reviewed of 367 patients (303 men; mean age 68.5±10.8 years) having 599 access site closures with the 6-F Perclose ProGlide performed in conjunction with percutaneous endovascular aortic repairs. Procedure success was defined as hemostasis with the preclose technique without the need for any ancillary procedure. Access-related major adverse events included infection, bleeding, lower leg ischemia, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, embolization, laceration, femoral artery thrombosis, nerve injury, or death owing to an access site injury. Results : Procedure success was achieved in 359 (97.8%) of 367 patients and in 591 (98.7%) of 599 femoral sites. Access-related major adverse events developed in 25 (6.8%) of 367 patients [26/599 (4.3%) sites]. The most frequent adverse event was a hematoma [16/367 (4.4%) patients; 17/599 (2.8%) sites], followed by pseudoaneurysm [7/367 (1.9%) patients; 7/599 (1.2%) sites]. Bleeding occurred in 6 (1.6%) of 367 patients [6/599 (1.0%) sites]. There were 2 infections, 2 distal embolizations, 1 acute femoral thrombosis, and 1 laceration at the puncture site. Conclusion : The preclose technique can be used to achieve hemostasis with remarkable success and low rates of adverse events.
    Journal of Endovascular Therapy 05/2013; 20(3):350-5. · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (P-EVAR) in an "unselected" population of patients using Prostar XL closure device, comparing our results with the literature data reported for open EVAR (O-EVAR) and P-EVAR in selected populations. We prospectively enrolled 200 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms to be treated with the P-EVAR procedure, without any selection criteria. Four hundred percutaneous femoral accesses using the Prostar XL closure device were performed. The early follow-up protocol consisted of a Doppler ultrasound (US) examination. Later evaluations were performed with US and computed tomography. Technical success was achieved in all percutaneous accesses (100 %). Ten early complications related to access site were recorded (10/400; 2.5 %): four pseudoaneurysms and six cases of lower limb ischaemia. Five of ten complications occurred in patients presenting calcification of the common femoral arteries, whereas 4/10 were in patients with "complex" groin anatomy. Eight of ten complications occurred at the access site of the main body of the prosthesis using a sheath size >20 Fr. Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair in "unselected" patients is safe and efficient, with a very low risk of access-related complications, comparable to P-EVAR in selected populations and to the best O-EVAR series.
    La radiologia medica 04/2014; · 1.46 Impact Factor