Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Blood (Impact Factor: 10.43). 10/2007; 110(5):1607-11. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-045369
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In a prospective trial in 284 children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we assessed the clinical utility of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of antigen receptor gene rearrangements for detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) to identify children at high risk of relapse. At the end of induction therapy, the 5-year risk of relapse was 5% in 176 children with no detectable MRD and 44% in 108 children with detectable MRD (P < .001), with a linear association of the level of MRD and subsequent relapse. Recursive partitioning and clinical characteristics identified that the optimal cutoff level of MRD to predict outcome was 10(-3). The 5-year risk of relapse was 12% for children with MRD less than one leukemia cell per 10(3) normal cells (low MRD) but 72% for children with MRD levels greater than this level (high MRD) (P < .001) and children with high MRD had a 10.5-fold greater risk of relapse. Based upon these results we have altered our treatment regimen for children with B-lineage ALL and children with MRD levels greater than or equal to 10(-3) at the end of 4 weeks of multiagent induction chemotherapy now receive intensified treatment to attempt to decrease their risk of subsequent relapse.

Download full-text


Available from: John G Gribben, Jul 29, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Minimal residual disease (MRD), as measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or flow cytometry, has been shown to be useful for predicting prognosis in paediatric (Brisco et al, 1994; Cave et al, 1998; Coustan-Smith et al, 1998; van Dongen et al, 1998; Dworzak et al, 2002; Nyvold et al, 2002; Zhou et al, 2007) and adult ALL patients (Brisco et al, 1996; Mortuza et al, 2002; Vidriales et al, 2003; Bruggemann et al, 2006; Raff et al, 2007). However , the utility of MRD as a prognostic indicator has been established on the basis of data from patients treated with chemotherapy alone, and it remains to be determined whether it is useful in patients treated with chemotherapy in combination with imatinib. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The clinical significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) is uncertain in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL) treated with imatinib-combined chemotherapy. Here we report the results of prospective MRD monitoring in 100 adult patients. Three hundred and sixty-seven follow-up bone marrow samples, collected at predefined time points during a uniform treatment protocol, were analysed for BCR-ABL1 transcripts by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Ninety-seven patients (97%) achieved complete remission (CR), and the relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was 46% at 3 years. Negative MRD at the end of induction therapy was not associated with longer RFS or a lower relapse rate (P = 0.800 and P = 0.964 respectively). Twenty-nine patients showed MRD elevation during haematological CR. Of these, 10 of the 16 who had undergone allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first CR were alive without relapse at a median of 2.9 years after transplantation, whereas 12 of the 13 who had not undergone allogeneic HSCT experienced a relapse. These results demonstrate that, in Ph+ ALL patients treated with imatinib-combined chemotherapy, rapid molecular response is not associated with a favourable prognosis, and that a single observation of elevated MRD is predictive of subsequent relapse, but allogeneic HSCT can override its adverse effect.
    British Journal of Haematology 12/2008; 143(4):503-10. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07377.x · 4.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "At the end of induction, 51% of samples had levels of MRD ‡0AE01%. In other large prospective studies, this value ranged from 24% to 60%, reflecting method sensitivity and differences in treatment protocols (Cave et al, 1998; van Dongen et al, 1998; Coustan-Smith et al, 2000; Dworzak et al, 2002; Nyvold et al, 2002; Zhou et al, 2007) (Table SVII). In addition, levels of MRD detected at <0AE01% by other studies varied greatly Fig 2. Kaplan–Meier curves for the three minimal residual disease (MRD) risk groups show significant differences with a log rank trend value <0AE01 (P = 0AE0091). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this single centre study of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients treated on the Medical Research Council UKALL 97/99 protocols, it was determined that minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) and 3-colour flow cytometry (FC) displayed high levels of qualitative concordance when evaluated at multiple time-points during treatment (93·38%), and a combined use of both approaches allowed a multi time-point evaluation of MRD kinetics for 90% (53/59) of the initial cohort. At diagnosis, MRD markers with sensitivity of at least 0·01% were identified by RQ-PCR detection of fusion gene transcripts, IGH/TRG rearrangements, and FC. Using a combined RQ-PCR and FC approach, the evaluation of 367 follow-up BM samples revealed that the detection of MRD >1% at Day 15 (P = 0·04), >0·01% at the end of induction (P = 0·02), >0·01% at the end of consolidation (P = 0·01), >0·01% prior to the first delayed intensification (P = 0·01), and >0·1% prior to the second delayed intensification and continued maintenance (P = 0·001) were all associated with relapse and, based on early time-points (end of induction and consolidation) a significant log-rank trend (P = 0·0091) was noted between survival curves for patients stratified into high, intermediate and low-risk MRD groups.
    British Journal of Haematology 11/2008; 144(1):107 - 115. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07429.x · 4.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In recent years, the status of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been considered as an additional prognostic factor (Gökbuget & Hoelzer, 2006; Pui & Evans, 2006). Data supporting its significance were raised mainly from the paediatric studies (Cave et al, 1998; Coustan-Smith et al, 1998; van Dongen et al, 1998; Dworzak et al, 2002; Nyvold et al, 2002; Zhou et al, 2007), while relatively few analyses were performed in adults (Cave et al, 1998; Coustan-Smith et al, 1998; van Dongen et al, 1998; Dworzak et al, 2002; Gameiro et al, 2002; Mortuza et al, 2002; Nyvold et al, 2002; Krampera et al, 2003; Vidriales et al, 2003; Bruggemann et al, 2006; Raff et al, 2007; Zhou et al, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of adults with Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) depends on the presence of risk factors including age, white blood cell count, immunophenotype and time to complete remission. In recent years, status of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been postulated as an additional risk criterion. This study prospectively evaluated the significance of MRD. Patients were treated with a uniform Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) 4-2002 protocol. MRD status was assessed after induction and consolidation by multiparametric flow cytometry. Out of 132 patients included (age, 17-60 years), 116 patients were suitable for analysis. MRD level >/=0.1% of bone marrow cells after induction was found to be a strong and independent predictor for relapse in the whole study population (P < 0.0001), as well as in the standard risk (SR, P = 0.0003) and high-risk (P = 0.008) groups. The impact of MRD after consolidation on outcome was not significant. The combination of MRD status with conventional risk stratification system identified a subgroup of patients allocated to the SR group with MRD <0.1% after induction who had a very low risk of relapse of 9% at 3 years as opposed to 71% in the remaining subjects (P = 0.001). We conclude that MRD evaluation after induction should be considered with conventional risk criteria for treatment decisions in adult ALL.
    British Journal of Haematology 05/2008; 142(2):227-37. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07185.x · 4.96 Impact Factor
Show more