Article

Treatment options for hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.

Division of Medical Oncology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.79). 06/2007; 82(5):628-37. DOI: 10.4065/82.5.628
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers account for 4% of all cancers in the United States. Traditionally, these cancers have had a high mortality rate and have been poorly responsive to therapy. Because of a growing number of treatment options, patients are now living longer. For hepatocellular carcinoma, a broad number of treatment options are available, including surgery, ablation, embolization, systemic therapy, and liver transplantation. Treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma include surgery, systemic therapy, and liver transplantation. For pancreatic cancer, surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy all have potential roles. This review provides an updated summary of diagnosis and assessment together with treatment options for this group of cancers.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
49 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma represents a devastating illness with poor outcomes when treated with standard systemic therapies. Several smaller nonrandomized outcomes studies have been reported for such patients undergoing transarterial therapies. A metaanalysis was performed to assess primary clinical and imaging outcomes, as well as complication rates, following transarterial interventions in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By using standard search techniques and metaanalysis methodology, published reports (published in 2012 and before) evaluating survival, complications, and imaging response following transarterial treatments for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were identified and evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles (N = 542 subjects) met the inclusion criteria and are included. Overall survival times were 15.7 months±5.8 and 13.4 months±6.7 from the time of diagnosis and time of first treatment, respectively. The overall weighted 1-year survival rate was 58.0%±14.5. More than three fourths of all subjects (76.8%) exhibited a response or stable disease on postprocedure imaging; 18.9% of all subjects experienced severe toxicities (National Cancer Institute/World Health Organization grade≥3), and most experienced some form of postembolization syndrome. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 0.7%. CONCLUSIONS: As demonstrated by this metaanalysis, transarterial chemotherapy-based treatments for cholangiocarcinoma appears to confer a survival benefit of 2-7 months compared with systemic therapies, demonstrate a favorable response by imaging criteria, and have an acceptable postprocedural complication profile. Such therapies should be strongly considered in the treatment of patients with this devastating illness.
    Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 05/2013; · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the impact on clinical management of introducing (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in to the work-up of patients with primary and recurrent biliary malignancy. Consecutive patients with primary biliary tumours undergoing FDG PET-CT at a single large tertiary referral centre between November 2007 and September 2010 were retrospectively analysed. Findings on FDG PET-CT compared with CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and impact on subsequent patient management were evaluated. Impact was divided into: (1) major-detection of occult disease or characterisation of indeterminate lesion(s) on CT/MRI; (2) minor-confirmation of suspected metastases seen on CT/MRI; (3) no impact. One hundred and eleven patients underwent 118 FDG PET-CT scans, including 30 with suspected gallbladder carcinoma and 81 with cholangiocarcinoma. Eighty-nine scans were performed for initial staging, five for restaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 24 for suspected disease recurrence. In 33 cases (28 %), FDG PET-CT had a major impact on subsequent patient management (39 % gallbladder carcinoma, 26 % intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 21 % extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). FDG PET-CT had a minor impact in 20 cases (17 %) and no impact in 65 cases (55 %). By detecting occult metastatic disease and characterising indeterminate lesions, FDG PET-CT can have a major influence on clinical decision-making in primary and recurrent biliary malignancy.
    Insights into imaging. 07/2013;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the histological changes in non-neoplastic pancreas and the effects on pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We reviewed the archival H&E slides from 218 patients with PDAC who completed NCRT and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sixty-five patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC without NCRT were used as controls. Various histological features were reviewed and correlated with NCRT and survival. The NCRT group had lower densities of PanIN2 (P = 0.004) and PanIN3 (P = 0.02) than the control group. The extent of fibrosis, the frequency of neuroma-like nerve proliferation and the frequency of islet cell aggregation were significantly higher in the NCRT group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The intensity of inflammation was less in the NCRT group than in the control group (P = 0.02). In the NCRT group, patents with moderate to severe fibrosis or grade 2 inflammation had poorer survival than those with mild fibrosis (P = 0.04) or those with grade 0 or grade 1 inflammation (P = 0.003), respectively. Non-neoplastic pancreatic tissue from patients who received NCRT had a reduced density of high-grade PanIN lesions, more pancreatic fibrosis, and higher frequencies of neuroma-like nerve proliferation and islet cell aggregation, but less inflammation, compared to tissue from those who did not receive NCRT.
    Histopathology 07/2013; · 2.86 Impact Factor