Understanding differences in past year psychiatric disorders for Latinos living in the US.

Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance, USA
Social Science [?] Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.56). 08/2007; 65(2):214-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.026
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study seeks to identify risk factors for psychiatric disorders that may explain differences in nativity effects among adult Latinos in the USA. We evaluate whether factors related to the processes of acculturation and enculturation, immigration factors, family stressors and supports, contextual factors, and social status in the US account for differences in 12-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders for eight subgroups of Latinos. We report results that differentiate Latino respondents by country of origin and age at immigration (whether they were US-born or arrived before age 6: In-US-as-Child [IUSC]; or whether they arrived after age 6: later-arrival immigrants [LAI]). After age and gender adjustments, LAI Mexicans and IUSC Cubans reported a significantly lower prevalence of depressive disorders than IUSC Mexicans. Once we adjust for differences in family stressors, contextual factors and social status factors, these differences are no longer significant. The risk for anxiety disorders appears no different for LAI compared to IUSC Latinos, after age and gender adjustments. For substance use disorders, family factors do not offset the elevated risk of early exposure to neighborhood disadvantage, but coming to the US after age 25 does offset it. Family conflict and burden were consistently related to the risk of mood disorders. Our findings suggest that successful adaptation into the US is a multidimensional process that includes maintenance of family harmony, integration in advantageous US neighborhoods, and positive perceptions of social standing. Our results uncover that nativity may be a less important independent risk factor for current psychiatric morbidity than originally thought.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonmigrant family members play a central role in facilitating Mexico-U.S. migration by maintaining families, sustaining social relationships, and overseeing household economic organization in sending communities. This study investigates changes to the emotional wellbeing of nonmigrant mothers when their partners reside in the United States. We hypothesize that partner migration affects mothers' wellbeing through three pathways: directly via the toll of spousal separation, and indirectly via changes to the economic profile of the sending household and through changes to mothers' household responsibilities. We test these relationships using data on 2813 mothers aged 18-44 in 2002 and measured in three waves (2002, 2005, 2009) of the Mexican Family Life Survey. We employ a fixed-effect estimation strategy that improves causal attribution of women's wellbeing to spousal residential location. We find evidence of increases in some forms of distress-sadness, crying, difficulty sleeping-when spouses are in the United States but no meaningful increase in depressive symptomology. Though partner emigration shifts several aspects of women's lives in sending households, changes to household resources or time allocation do not account for the moderate shifts in emotional duress associated with spousal absence. Importantly, additional tests reveal that we would observe large and significant associations between spousal migration and mothers' emotional wellbeing using a less rigorous estimation strategy, raising caution about the interpretation of cross-sectional studies evaluating wellbeing in sending homes. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Social Science [?] Medicine 11/2014; 132. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.009 · 2.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Lifetime prevalence of panic attacks is estimated at 22.7%, and research on the correlates and causes of depression, anxiety, and other mental illnesses have yielded mixed results in minority groups. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between panic attacks, minority status, and nativity by focusing on the effects of health lifestyle behaviors and discrimination. Methods: Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression, which was used to estimate the probability of meeting the criteria for panic attacks (n=17,249). Results: Demographic and socioeconomic variables had significant associations; females had over 2.4 times higher odds than males of meeting the criteria for panic attacks. The more frequently respondents were treated as dishonest, less smart, with disrespect, threatened, or called names, the more likely they met the criteria for panic attacks. Additionally, smoking and alcohol abuse were significant predictors of panic attacks. Those who abused alcohol have over 2 times the odds of having panic attacks. Similarly, smokers had a 52% higher odds of panic attacks than non-smokers. Limitations: The primary limitation of this project was the lack of availability of an acculturation measure with a secondary limitation being the inability to determine respondents’ legal status. Conclusions: Key findings were that health lifestyle choices and exposure to discrimination significantly affected the chance of having panic attacks. Nativity was protective; however, its effect was ameliorated by exposure to discrimination or engagement in smoking behavior or alcohol abuse. Thus, this study offers insight into contextual factors for clinicians caring for racial and ethnic minorities diagnosed with panic attacks.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 11/2014; 174. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.041 · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this study was to examine differences between Latino individuals with anxiety disorder diagnoses that include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and those with anxiety disorders without PTSD, in regards to comorbidity, psychosocial impairment, physical functioning, and treatment participation. The sample consisted of 150 adult Latinos participating in the Harvard/Brown Anxiety Research Project-Phase-II (HARP-II). Participants had at least one of the anxiety disorders included in the study (generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder with and without agoraphobia, social phobia, and/or PTSD). Forty-five (30%) participants had PTSD which was lower than rates of generalized anxiety disorder (n = 90, 60%), social anxiety (n = 86, 57.3%), and panic disorder with agoraphobia (n = 83, 55.3%), and higher than panic disorder without agoraphobia, (n = 10, 6.6%). Those with PTSD compared with those with other anxiety disorders had a statistically significant higher number of comorbid Axis I diagnoses, higher rates of psychiatric hospitalizations, and poorer overall social adjustment than participants with other anxiety disorders. Clinical implications for assessment and treatment planning of Latino individuals with anxiety disorders are discussed.
    Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy 07/2014; 6(4):345-352. DOI:10.1037/a0034328 · 0.89 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014