Article

Abdominal adiposity and mortality in Chinese women

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Нашвилл, Michigan, United States
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 05/2007; 167(9):886-92. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.9.886
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Increased abdominal adiposity has been linked to an increase in mortality in populations where many are overweight or obese; it is unclear whether the same is true in relatively lean populations.
We examined the association between waist-hip ratio and mortality in the Shanghai Women's Health Study, a population-based, prospective cohort study of Chinese women aged 40 to 70 years enrolled from December 28, 1996, through May 23, 2000, 95% of whom had a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of less than 30.0. Included in this analysis were 72 773 nonsmoking women who had anthropometrics taken by trained interviewers at enrollment and who were followed up through December 31, 2004. Deaths were ascertained by biennial home visits and linkage with the vital statistics registry.
During a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, 1456 deaths occurred. The waist-hip ratio was positively and significantly associated with deaths from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes (P<.01 for trend). A less significant positive association was found for death from cancer. After adjustment for body mass index and other potential confounders, the relative risks of total mortality were 1 (reference group), 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.58), 1.40 (95% CI, 1.14-1.72), 1.54 (95% CI, 1.26-1.88), and 1.95 (95% CI, 1.60-2.38) across the lowest to the highest waist-hip ratio quintiles. The positive association appeared to be more evident in women with a lower body mass index. The relative risks of total mortality comparing the extreme waist-hip ratio quintiles were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.71-3.27), 1.60 (95% CI, 1.10-2.34), and 1.46 (95% CI, 0.97-2.20) for women with a body mass index of less than 22.3, 22.3 to 25.1, and 25.2 or greater, respectively.
Abdominal adiposity independently predicts mortality risk, particularly for nonobese women.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
116 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Leisure time exercise has been linked to lower circulating levels of inflammatory markers. Few studies have examined the association of nonexercise physical activity with markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis included 1005 Chinese women aged 40-70 years. Usual physical activity was assessed through in-person interviews using a validated physical activity questionnaire. Plasma proinflammatory cytokines and urinary F2-isoprostanes were measured. Multivariable linear models were used to evaluate the association of inflammatory and oxidative stress markers with nonexercise physical activity and its major components. Results: Nonexercise physical activity accounted for 93.8% of overall physical activity energy expenditure. Levels of nonexercise physical activity were inversely associated with circulating concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 (Ptrend=0.004), IL-1β (Ptrend=0.03) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (Ptrend=0.01). Multivariable-adjusted concentrations of these cytokines were 28.2% for IL-6, 22.1% for IL-1β, and 15.9% for TNF-α lower in the highest quartile of nonexercise physical activity compared with the lowest quartile. Similar inverse associations were found for two major components of nonexercise physical activity, walking and biking for transportation, and household activity. No significant associations were observed between nonexercise physical activity and oxidative stress markers. Conclusion: Daily nonexercise physical activity is associated with lower levels of systemic inflammation. This finding may have important public health implications because this type of activity is the main contributor to overall physical activity among middle-aged and elderly women.
    Journal of Women's Health 10/2013; DOI:10.1089/jwh.2013.4456 · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obesity paradox has been reported because of the inverse relationship between the body mass index (BMI) and mortality in stroke patients. The relationship between BMI and functional recovery in stroke survivors is less well established. We explored the impact of BMI on functional recovery and mortality in stroke patients in the China National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Patients were consecutively recruited based on a standard protocol and prospectively followed up for outcomes at 3 months after disease onset. Patients were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (18.5-22.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (23-27.4 kg/m(2)), obese (27.5-32.4 kg/m(2)), or severely obese (≥32.5 kg/m(2)). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the association between BMI and functional recovery or mortality. CNSR enrolled 22,216 patients hospitalized for acute cerebrovascular events, and 10,905 eligible acute ischemic stroke patients were analyzed in our study. Favorable functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) was seen in 52.4% of underweight, 55.0% of normal weight, 61.0% of overweight, 59.2% of obese, and 60.3% of severely obese stroke survivors (P < .001). Overweight was independently associated with favorable 3-month functional recovery (odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.38). Mortality rate was 14.9% in underweight, 7.8% in normal weight, 7.1% in overweight, 7.2% in obese, and 11.5% in severely obese patients (P < .001). Severe obesity was independently associated with higher 3-month mortality (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.10-3.69). The stroke obesity paradox can be extended to include functional recovery but should not be interpreted as the fatter the better.
    Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association 11/2013; 23(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.10.002 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • Future Lipidology 04/2008; 3(2):139-152. DOI:10.2217/17460875.3.2.139 · 0.77 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
45 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014