Mutations in the RAD27 and SGS1 genes differentially affect the chronological and replicative lifespan of yeast cells growing on glucose and glycerol

University of Oslo, Kristiania (historical), Oslo, Norway
FEMS Yeast Research (Impact Factor: 2.82). 10/2007; 7(6):848-59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00248.x
Source: PubMed


The Sgs1 protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a member of the RecQ helicases. Defects in RecQ helicases result in premature aging phenotypes in both yeasts and humans, which appear to be promoted by replicative stress. Yeast rad27 mutants also suffer from premature aging. As the human Rad27p and Sgs1p homologs interact, a similar interaction between the yeast proteins could be important for promoting longevity in S. cerevisiae. We tested the contribution of a potential interaction between Rad27p and Sgs1p to longevity by analyzing lifespan and parameters associated with longevity in rad27 and sgs1 mutants. The carbon source supporting growth also modulated longevity as evaluated by replicative and chronological lifespan measurements. Growth on glycerol promoted chronological lifespan, while maximum replicative lifespan was obtained with glucose-supported growth. In comparison to the individual mutants, the sgs1 rad27 double mutant displayed a shortened replicative lifespan and was also more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents. In addition to promoting replicative lifespan, the activity of Rad27p was critical for achieving full chronological lifespan. The rad27 mutants exhibited increased oxidative stress levels along with an elevated spontaneous mutation rate. Removal of Sgs1p activity additionally increased the oxidative stress and spontaneous mutation rate in rad27 mutants without affecting the chronological lifespan.

1 Follower
7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA damage is an important factor in aging in all eukaryotes. Although connections between DNA damage and aging have been extensively investigated in complex organisms, only a relatively few studies have investigated DNA damage as an aging factor in the model organism S. cerevisiae. Several of these studies point to DNA replication stress as a cause of age-dependent DNA damage in the replicative model of aging, which measures how many times budding yeast cells divide before they senesce and die. Even fewer studies have investigated how DNA damage contributes to aging in the chronological aging model, which measures how long cells in stationary phase cultures retain reproductive capacity. DNA replication stress also has been implicated as a factor in chronological aging. Since cells in stationary phase are generally considered to be “post-mitotic” and to reside in a quiescent G0/G1 state, the notion that defects in DNA replication might contribute to chronological aging appears to be somewhat paradoxical. However, the results of recent studies suggest that a significant fraction of cells in stationary phase cultures are not quiescent, especially in experiments that employ defined medium, which is frequently employed to assess chronological lifespan. Most cells that fail to achieve quiescence remain in a viable, but non-dividing state until they eventually die, similar to the senescent state in mammalian cells. In this chapter we discuss the role of DNA damage and DNA replication stress in both replicative and chronological aging in S. cerevisiae. We also discuss the relevance of these findings to the emerging view that DNA damage and DNA replication stress are important components of the senescent state that occurs at early stages of cancer.
    Sub-cellular biochemistry 01/2012; 57:187-206. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-2561-4_9
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When investigating aging it is important to focus on the factors that are needed to attain, and which can be manipulated to extend, the longest lifespans. This has long been appreciated by those workers who use Drosophila or Caenorhabditis elegans as model experimental systems to study aging. Often though it seems it is not a consideration in many studies of yeast chronological aging. In this chapter I summarise how recent work has revealed the preconditioning that is needed for yeast to survive for long periods in stationary phase, therefore for it to exhibit a long chronological life span (CLS). Of critical importance in this regard is the nature of the nutrient limitation that, during the earlier growth phase, had forced the cells to undergo growth arrest. I have attempted to highlight those studies that have focussed on the longest CLSs, as this helps to identify investigations that may be addressing - not just factors that can influence chronological longevity - but those factors that are correlated with the authentic processes of chronological aging. Attempting to maximize long-term stationary survival in yeast should also enhance the potential relevance of this organism as an aging model to those who wrestle with the problems of aging in more complex systems. Finally I also give a personal perspective of how studies on the yeast CLS may still yet provide some important new insights into events that are correlated with aging.
    Sub-cellular biochemistry 01/2012; 57:145-59. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-2561-4_7
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Manganese is an essential trace element, whose intracellular levels need to be carefully regulated. Mn(2+) acts as a cofactor for many enzymes and excess of Mn(2+) is toxic. Alterations in Mn(2+) homeostasis affect metabolic functions and mutations in the human Mn(2+)/Ca(2+) transporter ATP2C1 have been linked to Hailey-Hailey disease. By deletion of the yeast orthologue PMR1 we have studied the impact of Mn(2+) on cell cycle progression and show that an excess of cytosolic Mn(2+) alters S-phase transit, induces transcriptional up-regulation of cell cycle regulators, bypasses the need for S-phase cell cycle checkpoints and predisposes to genomic instability. On the other hand, we find that depletion of the Golgi Mn(2+) pool requires a functional morphology checkpoint to avoid the formation of polyploid cells.
    Journal of Biological Chemistry 04/2012; 287(22):18717-29. DOI:10.1074/jbc.M112.358309 · 4.57 Impact Factor
Show more