Article

Bacterial contamination and decontamination of toothbrushes after use.

Department of Community Dentistry, Jaipur Dental College, India.
The New York state dental journal 05/2007; 73(3):20-2.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of bacterial contamination of toothbrushes after use and the efficacy of chlorhexidine and Listerine in decontaminating toothbrushes. The effectiveness of covering a toothbrush head with a plastic cap in preventing contamination was also evaluated. It was found that 70% of the used toothbrushes were heavily contaminated with different pathogenic microorganisms. Use of a cap leads to growth of opportunistic microorganisms like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which may cause infection in the oral cavity. Overnight immersion of a toothbrush in chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2%) was found to be highly effective in preventing such microbial contamination.

Full-text

Available from: Abhishek Mehta, Jan 09, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
390 Views
  • Source
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Los instrumentos dentales y de higiene bucal usados frecuentemente para mantener una buena higiene bucal y prevenir la aparición de enfermedades pueden contribuir a la transmisión de microorganismos patógenos si no se usan correctamente tal es el caso del cepillo dental. Esta investigación evaluó la presencia de Enterobacterias en cerdas de cepillos dentales y exudados faríngeos de los estudiantes del 4to año de la Escuela de Bioanálisis de la Universidad de Carabobo. El estudio fue correlacional, de campo y de corte transversal. Se evaluaron 90 estudiantes divididos en grupo A (casos) y grupo B (control), determinándose la presencia de Enterobacterias en cerdas de cepillos dentales de ambos grupos, observándose una mayor positividad en los cepillos del grupo A (76%), en comparación al grupo B (40%). También se determinó la presencia de Enterobacterias en exudados faríngeos de ambos grupos, en el que se encontró una mayor prevalencia de Enterobacterias en el grupo A (51%) con respecto al grupo B (36%). Entre los principales factores de riesgo que contribuyeron a la contaminación de los cepillos dentales estuvieron el guardado del cepillo dental en el cuarto de baño, el contacto con otros cepillos dentales durante su guardado y el tiempo prolongado de uso. Las Enterobacterias más aisladas en esta investigación fueron Klebsiella pneumoniae y Escherichia coli. Se concluye que existe una asociación estadísticamente significativa (p < 0.05) entre la presencia de Enterobacterias en las cerdas de los cepillos dentales y la colonización de estas bacterias en la faringe de los estudiantes. Palabras clave: Cepillo dental, Enterobacterias, Exudado Faríngeo. Trabajo Presentado en el marco de VIII Congreso Nacional y II internacional de Investigación de la Universidad de Carabobo.
  • Source
    Priyal Matreja, Rajshree Bhandari, Meena Anand, Seema Shetty, Srinivasan Raj, Samuel & Betsy, S Thomas
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Toothbrushes get easily contaminated with different microorganisms originating not only from the oral cavity but also from the surroundings in which they are stored. Contaminated toothbrushes might serve as a possible cause in infection or reinfection especially in patients undergoing periodontal treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of five different disinfectant solutions like hydrogen peroxide (3%), Chlorhexidinegluconate (0.2%), essential oil, Saline (9%) and Cetylpyridinium chloride.Sixty dental graduates were randomly assigned as control and experimental groups and were provided with toothbrushes and the disinfectant solution for routine use twice daily for three days. They were instructed to immerse the toothbrush head in the disinfectant solution for five minutes after brushing and the toothbrush was air dried. Toothbrushes were collected from volunteers after three days of use for microbiological analysis. Abstract-Toothbrushes get easily contaminated with different microorganisms originating not only from the oral cavity but also from the surroundings in which they are stored. Contaminated toothbrushes might serve as a possible cause in infection or reinfection especially in patients undergoing periodontal treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of five different disinfectant solutions like hydrogen peroxide (3%), Chlorhexidinegluconate (0.2%), essential oil, Saline (9%) and Cetylpyridinium chloride.Sixty dental graduates were randomly assigned as control and experimental groups and were provided with toothbrushes and the disinfectant solution for routine use twice daily for three days. They were instructed to immerse the toothbrush head in the disinfectant solution for five minutes after brushing and the toothbrush was air dried. Toothbrushes were collected from volunteers after three days of use for microbiological analysis. 3% Hydrogen peroxide (MD=-2.02, p<0.001), mouthwash containing 0.2% chlorhexidinegluconate (MD=-1.79, P<0.001) and mouthwash containing essential oils (MD=-1.51, P<0.008) gave a significantly lower CFUs score whereas saline and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash failed to produce a significant difference in the number of CFUs when compared with that of water. The presents study shows that using 3% H2O2 in 1:1 dilution for disinfecting toothbrush after brushing is the most effective method followed by mouthwashes containing .2% chlorhexidinegluconate and essential oils respectively.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess and compare the efficacy of 3% garlic extract, 0.2% tea tree oil, 0.2% chlorhexidine, 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride, and ultravoilet (UV) toothbrush sanitizing device as toothbrush disinfectants against Streptococcus mutans. A double blind randomized controlled parallel study was done on 210 dental students. The subjects were divided into one control group using distilled water and five study groups representing 0.2% tea tree oil, 3% garlic extract, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride and UV toothbrush sanitizing device. Participants were provided with new toothbrushes and toothpastes for both baseline and intervention phases. The toothbrushes were collected after two weeks for microbial analysis in both phases. The data were analysed and compared using appropriate statistical analysis. On comparing pre- and post-intervention, S. mutans colony counts, a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference was observed in all the groups. Differences of 77.74 colony forming units (CFU) in tea tree oil group, 102.87 CFU in garlic group, 68.13 CFU in chlorhexidine group, 82.47 CFU in cetylpyridinium group and 42.67 CFU in UV toothbrush sanitizer group were observed. Garlic group showed the highest reduction (100%) whereas UV toothbrush sanitizer group showed the least reduction (47.4%) in S. mutans colonies. The antimicrobial agents used in this study effectively reduced the S. mutans counts and hence can be considered as toothbrush disinfectants to prevent dental caries. The 3% garlic was the most effective among the antimicrobial agents.
    10/2014; 5(4):183-9. DOI:10.4103/0975-962X.144718